These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37179853)

  • 1. Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?
    Caso L; Cavagnis L; Vrij A; Palena N
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1128194. PubMed ID: 37179853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of sketching while narrating on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S; Burkhardt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103236. PubMed ID: 33360343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of a model statement on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jun; 207():103080. PubMed ID: 32413731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proportion of complications in interpreter-absent and interpreter-present interviews.
    Vrij A; Leal S
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(1):155-164. PubMed ID: 32284786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using the model statement to elicit information and cues to deceit in interpreter-based interviews.
    Vrij A; Leal S; Mann S; Dalton G; Jo E; Shaboltas A; Khaleeva M; Granskaya J; Houston K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():44-53. PubMed ID: 28477454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unraveling the Misconception About Deception and Nervous Behavior.
    Vrij A; Fisher RP
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1377. PubMed ID: 32625154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence Can Be Used to Discriminate Between Accurate and Inaccurate Lie Decisions.
    Smith AM; Leach AM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 Nov; 14(6):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 31539484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the efficacy of baselining in deception detection: A comparative analysis of the reality interview and structured interview.
    Bogaard G; van de Bovekamp AM; Colwell K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Feb; 242():104112. PubMed ID: 38070326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Truth-tellers stand the test of time and contradict evidence less than liars, even months after a crime.
    Sukumar D; Wade KA; Hodgson JS
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 42(2):145-155. PubMed ID: 29672094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting Lies via a Theme-Selection Strategy.
    Palena N; Caso L; Vrij A
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2775. PubMed ID: 30687204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amplifying recall after delays via initial interviewing: Inoculating truth-tellers' memory as a function of encoding quality.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Deeb H; Hope L; Mann S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103130. PubMed ID: 32683098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different physiological reactions when observing lies versus truths: Initial evidence and an intervention to enhance accuracy.
    Ten Brinke L; Lee JJ; Carney DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Sep; 117(3):560-578. PubMed ID: 30869984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How deception and believability feedback affect recall.
    Vo TVA; Gunderson CA; Ten Brinke L
    Memory; 2022 Jul; 30(6):706-714. PubMed ID: 33557706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 'Please tell me all you remember': a comparison between British and Arab interviewees' free narrative performance and its implications for lie detection.
    Vrij A; Leal S; Mann S; Vernham Z; Dalton G; Serok-Jeppa O; Rozmann N; Nahari G; Fisher RP
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(4):546-559. PubMed ID: 35558151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A stability bias effect among deceivers.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Hope L; Leal S; Mann S
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):519-529. PubMed ID: 28726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cues to deception.
    DePaulo BM; Lindsay JJ; Malone BE; Muhlenbruck L; Charlton K; Cooper H
    Psychol Bull; 2003 Jan; 129(1):74-118. PubMed ID: 12555795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Face-to-Face Lying: Gender and Motivation to Deceive.
    Elaad E; Gonen-Gal Y
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():820923. PubMed ID: 35391990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
    Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How researchers can make verbal lie detection more attractive for practitioners.
    Vrij A; Fisher RP; Leal S
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2023; 30(3):383-396. PubMed ID: 37346059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.