These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37180686)

  • 1. Stress distribution in bone around an implant-supported three-unit fixed dental prosthesis using two different computer-aided designing/computer-aided milling provisional crown materials: Milled polymethylmethacrylate and milled polyetheretherketone - A finite element analysis.
    Barua SL; Poduval TS; Rani S; Jain N; Thakur S
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():33. PubMed ID: 37180686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different framework materials in implant-supported fixed mandibular prosthesis].
    Yu WQ; Li XQ; Chen SY; Ma XN; Xu X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Feb; 56(2):190-195. PubMed ID: 33557504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of stress distribution around CFR‑PEEK implants and titanium implants with different prosthetic crowns: A finite element analysis.
    Tamrakar SK; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R; Rao S
    Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(3):359-367. PubMed ID: 34597479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of bone mass density and alveolar bone resorption on stress in implant restoration of free-end edentulous posterior mandible: Finite element analysis of double-factor sensitivity.
    Ye Z; Ye H; Wu Y; Jiang Z; Yao H; Xu X; Zhang Y; Du W; Li W; Zheng Y; Ye P; Ding X; Wu L
    Ann Anat; 2024 Apr; 253():152210. PubMed ID: 38244942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of different implant designs on replacement of four teeth of the posterior free-end edentulism: Three-dimensional finite element analysis and clinic case validation.
    Ye Z; Ye H; Jiang Z; Wu S; Feng Z; Liu H; Wang X; Lan R; Lin X; Ding C; Zhang Q; Ding X; Wu L
    Ann Anat; 2023 Aug; 249():152111. PubMed ID: 37247761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stress distribution around different abutments on titanium and CFR-PEEK implant with different prosthetic crowns under parafunctional loading: A 3D FEA study.
    Mourya A; Nahar R; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2021; 11(2):313-320. PubMed ID: 33816100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of different occlusal materials on peri-implant stress distribution with different osseointegration condition: A finite element analysis.
    Thirumaran D; Leoney A; Fayeez A; Yazhini Shanmya P
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Jul; 24(3):292-299. PubMed ID: 38946514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Implant Location, Number, and Design in Ischemic Zone for Implant Prosthesis Success Rate: A Comparative Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Sayed AJ; Garg KK; Mohan SR; Khan Tareen SU; Shiva Shankar B; Omran MH
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e53881. PubMed ID: 38465182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis.
    Tretto PHW; Dos Santos MBF; Spazzin AO; Pereira GKR; Bacchi A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jun; 23(8):372-383. PubMed ID: 32116034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation to study the effect of implant support on complete fixed dental prosthesis fabricated with peek framework when implants placed in all-on-4 and all-on-6 situation, by strain gauge analysis and finite element analysis - An
    Vinodh S; K Jingade RR; Ajjikuttira PA; Kyathappa P; Nataraj M; Chalana BO
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(4):373-378. PubMed ID: 37861614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polyetheretherketone computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing framework for All-on-Four mandibular full-arch prosthesis: 3 Years' retrospective study of peri-implant soft tissue changes and ridge base relationship.
    Mourad KE; Altonbary GY; Emera RMK; Hegazy SAF
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):579-587. PubMed ID: 36069047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of stress distribution of different marginal designs on PEEK and PEKK substructure materials, cortical and cancellous Bone:A finite element analysis.
    Karakaya K; Mutluay Ünal S
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Aug; 178():108708. PubMed ID: 38861895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress analysis in implant, abutment, and peripheral bone with different restorative crown and abutment materials: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Rani S; Jain N; Barua SL; Idnani S; Kaushik N
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():62. PubMed ID: 37388301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of occlusal splint and implant connection on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis and peri-implantal bone.
    Dos Santos Marsico V; Lehmann RB; de Assis Claro CA; Amaral M; Vitti RP; Neves ACC; da Silva Concilio LR
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Nov; 80():141-148. PubMed ID: 28866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Stress Distribution Among Standard Dental Implants Placed in Grafted Bone, Zygomatic Implants, and Subperiosteal Implants in the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Keleş HG; Karaca Ç
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):347-356. PubMed ID: 37083910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Syncrystallization: a technique for temporization of immediately loaded implants with metal-reinforced acrylic resin restorations.
    Degidi M; Gehrke P; Spanel A; Piattelli A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):123-34. PubMed ID: 16919020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stress behavior of an anterior single implant restored with high-performance polymer abutments under immediate and delayed loading: A 3D FEA study.
    Diken Turksayar AA; Donmez MB
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 36007157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stress distribution and fracture resistance of green reprocessed polyetheretherketone (PEEK) single implant crown restorations compared to unreprocessed PEEK and Zirconia: an in-vitro study.
    Emam M; Arafa AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 May; 23(1):275. PubMed ID: 37170111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.