180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37182130)
1. Cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Li Y
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1113374. PubMed ID: 37182130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pembrolizumab vs cemiplimab for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 expression levels of at least 50%: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Li Y; Liang X; Yang T; Guo S; Chen X
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():878054. PubMed ID: 36226060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line serplulimab combined with chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Li Y
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1156427. PubMed ID: 37727602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Economic evaluation of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy regimen for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Lang Y; Lin Y; Deng M; Liu X
BMC Cancer; 2024 Feb; 24(1):236. PubMed ID: 38383374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cemiplimab combined with chemotherapy
Zhu G; Cai H; Zheng Z
Ther Adv Med Oncol; 2023; 15():17588359231213619. PubMed ID: 38028144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-Effectiveness of Cemiplimab Versus Standard of Care in the United States for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression ≥50.
Kuznik A; Smare C; Chen CI; Venkatachalam M; Keeping S; Atsou K; Xu Y; Wilson F; Guyot P; Chan K; Glowienka E; Konidaris G
Value Health; 2022 Feb; 25(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 35094793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First-line Cemiplimab versus Standard Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with at Least 50% Programmed Cell Death Receptor Ligand-1 Positivity: Analysis of Cost-effectiveness.
Zhang M; Liu X; Wen F; Wu Q; Zhou K; Bai L; Li Q
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2022 Mar; 34(3):e123-e129. PubMed ID: 34736841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sugemalimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Liu X; Li Y
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1054405. PubMed ID: 36923040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy is more cost-effective than chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Li Y
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1009920. PubMed ID: 36794070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Lu T; Huang Y; Cai Z; Lin W; Chen X; Chen R; Hu Y
Front Pharmacol; 2023; 14():1171302. PubMed ID: 37564176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Nivolumab Versus Sorafenib as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Li Y; Liang X; Li H; Yang T; Guo S; Chen X
Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():906956. PubMed ID: 35928269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Liu L; Wang L; Chen L; Ding Y; Zhang Q; Shu Y
Front Immunol; 2023; 14():1092385. PubMed ID: 36756110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cemiplimab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 Expression Levels of at Least 50.
Wang L; Peng Y; Zeng X; Peng L; Li S; Qin S; Wan X; Tan C
Adv Ther; 2021 Aug; 38(8):4354-4365. PubMed ID: 34241780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
Shi D; Li Y; Liang X; Chen L
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1162360. PubMed ID: 37251935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. First-Line ICI Monotherapies for Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients With PD-L1 of at Least 50%: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Liu Q; Zhou Z; Luo X; Yi L; Peng L; Wan X; Tan C; Zeng X
Front Pharmacol; 2021; 12():788569. PubMed ID: 34992538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Preliminary Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of Cemiplimab in Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Italy.
Ghetti G; D'Avella MC; Pradelli L
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2021; 13():121-133. PubMed ID: 33603419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-Effectiveness and Net Monetary Benefit of Olaparib Maintenance Therapy Versus No Maintenance Therapy After First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Advanced BRCA1/2-mutated Ovarian Cancer in the Italian National Health Service.
Armeni P; Borsoi L; Fornaro G; Jommi C; Colombo N; Costa F
Clin Ther; 2020 Jul; 42(7):1192-1209.e12. PubMed ID: 32591103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of continuing bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone after first progression of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Li Y; Hu M; Zhang Z; Chu M; Xu R; Liu L; Dong W; Yang M; Zhang R
Cancer Med; 2024 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 38186268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China.
Liu H; Wang Y; He Q
Health Econ Rev; 2022 Dec; 12(1):66. PubMed ID: 36581793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cemiplimab as Second-Line Therapy for Patients with Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A United States-based Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
Liu K; Zhu Y; Zhou Y; Zhu H
Adv Ther; 2023 Apr; 40(4):1838-1849. PubMed ID: 36870042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
