These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3718215)

  • 1. Mammography of women with suspicious breast lumps.
    Young JO; Sadowsky NL; Young JW; Herman L
    Arch Surg; 1986 Jul; 121(7):807-9. PubMed ID: 3718215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Value of Mammography in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Lumps in Women 30 Years Old and Older.
    Brown AL; Phillips J; Slanetz PJ; Fein-Zachary V; Venkataraman S; Dialani V; Mehta TS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):935-942. PubMed ID: 28777649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utility and Outcomes of Imaging Evaluation for Palpable Lumps in the Postmastectomy Patient.
    Dashevsky BZ; Hayward JH; Woodard GA; Joe BN; Lee AY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):464-472. PubMed ID: 31039027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Mammography and mammary ultrasonography: which examination sequence is preferable?].
    Müller-Schimpfle M; Stern W; Stoll P; Kaiser JW; Claussen CD
    Rofo; 1997 Oct; 167(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9417262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy of breast ultrasound in the evaluation of clinically benign discrete, symptomatic breast lumps.
    Lister D; Evans AJ; Burrell HC; Blamey RW; Wilson AR; Pinder SE; Ellis IO; Elston CW; Kollias J
    Clin Radiol; 1998 Jul; 53(7):490-2. PubMed ID: 9714387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scintimammographic analysis of nonpalpable breast lesions previously identified by conventional mammography.
    Tolmos J; Cutrone JA; Wang B; Vargas HI; Stuntz M; Mishkin FS; Diggles LE; Venegas RJ; Klein SR; Khalkhali I
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Jun; 90(11):846-9. PubMed ID: 9625173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combined assessment (aspiration cytology and mammography) of clinically suspicious breast masses.
    van Wyk WF; Dent DM; Hacking EA; Learmonth G; Kottler RE; Gudgeon CA; Tiltman A
    S Afr Med J; 1995 Feb; 85(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 7597539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Specificity of screening in United Kingdom trial of early detection of breast cancer.
    BMJ; 1992 Feb; 304(6823):346-9. PubMed ID: 1540731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. False-negative mammograms in patients with breast cancer.
    Niloff PH; Sheiner NM
    Can J Surg; 1981 Jan; 24(1):50, 52. PubMed ID: 7459735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utility of Diagnostic Mammography as the Primary Imaging Modality for Palpable Lumps in Women With Almost Entirely Fatty Breasts.
    Linden OE; Hayward JH; Price ER; Kelil T; Joe BN; Lee AY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):938-944. PubMed ID: 32023120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changing emphasis in breast diagnosis: the surgeon's role in evaluating mammographic abnormalities.
    Sterns EE
    J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Mar; 184(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 9060928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic findings and extent of disease at diagnosis in 184 patients.
    Krecke KN; Gisvold JJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):957-60. PubMed ID: 8273634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI.
    Vreemann S; van Zelst JCM; Schlooz-Vries M; Bult P; Hoogerbrugge N; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A; Mann RM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Aug; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 30075794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.
    Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancers invisible on mammography.
    Foxcroft LM; Evans EB; Joshua HK; Hirst C
    Aust N Z J Surg; 2000 Mar; 70(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 10765896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammography and the primary care management of breast lumps.
    Banerjee A; Burke M
    Practitioner; 1989 May; 233(1468):652-5. PubMed ID: 2557602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fine-needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation.
    Ariga R; Bloom K; Reddy VB; Kluskens L; Francescatti D; Dowlat K; Siziopikou P; Gattuso P
    Am J Surg; 2002 Nov; 184(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 12433603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy by surgeons: minimum 2-year follow-up of benign lesions.
    Burns RP; Brown JP; Roe SM; Sprouse LR; Yancey AE; Witherspoon LE
    Ann Surg; 2000 Oct; 232(4):542-8. PubMed ID: 10998652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of mammographic appearances after breast fine-needle aspiration.
    Hindle WH; Chen EC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1286-90; discussion 1290-2. PubMed ID: 9215186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound.
    Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV
    Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.