These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37183666)

  • 1. Monitoring mosquito richness in an understudied area: can environmental DNA metabarcoding be a complementary approach to adult trapping?
    Gutiérrez-López R; Egeter B; Paupy C; Rahola N; Makanga B; Jiolle D; Bourret V; Melo M; Loiseau C
    Bull Entomol Res; 2023 Aug; 113(4):456-468. PubMed ID: 37183666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection and persistence of environmental DNA (eDNA) of the different developmental stages of a vector mosquito, Culex pipiens pallens.
    Sakata MK; Sato M; Sato MO; Watanabe T; Mitsuishi H; Hikitsuchi T; Kobayashi J; Minamoto T
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272653. PubMed ID: 35947597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of benthic invertebrate diversity and river ecological status along an urbanized gradient using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a traditional survey method.
    Ji F; Han D; Yan L; Yan S; Zha J; Shen J
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 2):150587. PubMed ID: 34582852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding shows high potential as a novel approach to quantitatively assess fish community.
    Tsuji S; Inui R; Nakao R; Miyazono S; Saito M; Kono T; Akamatsu Y
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21524. PubMed ID: 36513686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unveiling invasive insect threats to plant biodiversity: Leveraging eDNA metabarcoding and saturated salt trap solutions for biosurveillance.
    Milián-García Y; Pyne C; Lindsay K; Romero A; Hanner RH
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0290036. PubMed ID: 37566591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrating eDNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual surveys to describe complex fish communities in a marine biodiversity hotspot.
    Valdivia-Carrillo T; Rocha-Olivares A; Reyes-Bonilla H; Domínguez-Contreras JF; Munguia-Vega A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Jul; 21(5):1558-1574. PubMed ID: 33683812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating invasive species risk assessment into environmental DNA metabarcoding reference libraries.
    Mahon AR; Grey EK; Jerde CL
    Ecol Appl; 2023 Jan; 33(1):e2730. PubMed ID: 36054696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Airborne environmental DNA metabarcoding detects more diversity, with less sampling effort, than a traditional plant community survey.
    Johnson MD; Fokar M; Cox RD; Barnes MA
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):218. PubMed ID: 34872490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing without harvesting: Pros and cons of environmental DNA sampling and image analysis for marine biodiversity evaluation.
    Kopp D; Faillettaz R; Le Joncour A; Simon J; Morandeau F; Le Bourdonnec P; Bouché L; Méhault S
    Mar Environ Res; 2023 Jun; 188():106004. PubMed ID: 37127004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Molecular identity crisis: environmental DNA metabarcoding meets traditional taxonomy-assessing biodiversity and freshwater mussel populations (Unionidae) in Alabama.
    Hauck LL; Atkinson CL; Homyack JA; Penaluna BE; Mangum C; Coble AA; Nettles J; Thornton-Frost JE; Fix MJ
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15127. PubMed ID: 37033728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mosquito Identification From Bulk Samples Using DNA Metabarcoding: a Protocol to Support Mosquito-Borne Disease Surveillance in Canada.
    Mechai S; Bilodeau G; Lung O; Roy M; Steeves R; Gagne N; Baird D; Lapen DR; Ludwig A; Ogden NH
    J Med Entomol; 2021 Jul; 58(4):1686-1700. PubMed ID: 33822118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of environmental DNA in assessment of fish functional and phylogenetic diversity.
    Marques V; Castagné P; Polanco A; Borrero-Pérez GH; Hocdé R; Guérin PÉ; Juhel JB; Velez L; Loiseau N; Letessier TB; Bessudo S; Valentini A; Dejean T; Mouillot D; Pellissier L; Villéger S
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Dec; 35(6):1944-1956. PubMed ID: 34224158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the impact of the threatened crucian carp (Carassius carassius) on pond invertebrate diversity: A comparison of conventional and molecular tools.
    Harper LR; Lawson Handley L; Sayer CD; Read DS; Benucci M; Blackman RC; Hill MJ; Hänfling B
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3252-3269. PubMed ID: 33002225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biodiversity and spatial distribution of ascidian using environmental DNA metabarcoding.
    Bae S; Kim P; Yi CH
    Mar Environ Res; 2023 Mar; 185():105893. PubMed ID: 36689844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods.
    Pawlowski J; Bruce K; Panksep K; Aguirre FI; Amalfitano S; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Baussant T; Bouchez A; Carugati L; Cermakova K; Cordier T; Corinaldesi C; Costa FO; Danovaro R; Dell'Anno A; Duarte S; Eisendle U; Ferrari BJD; Frontalini F; Frühe L; Haegerbaeumer A; Kisand V; Krolicka A; Lanzén A; Leese F; Lejzerowicz F; Lyautey E; Maček I; Sagova-Marečková M; Pearman JK; Pochon X; Stoeck T; Vivien R; Weigand A; Fazi S
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 818():151783. PubMed ID: 34801504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Method for Biodiversity Monitoring of Marine Fish Communities.
    Miya M
    Ann Rev Mar Sci; 2022 Jan; 14():161-185. PubMed ID: 34351788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of sampling strategies and DNA extraction methods on eDNA metabarcoding: A case study of estuarine fish diversity monitoring.
    Ruan HT; Wang RL; Li HT; Liu L; Kuang TX; Li M; Zou KS
    Zool Res; 2022 Mar; 43(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 35084125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities.
    Deiner K; Bik HM; Mächler E; Seymour M; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Altermatt F; Creer S; Bista I; Lodge DM; de Vere N; Pfrender ME; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Nov; 26(21):5872-5895. PubMed ID: 28921802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods.
    Hänfling B; Lawson Handley L; Read DS; Hahn C; Li J; Nichols P; Blackman RC; Oliver A; Winfield IJ
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3101-19. PubMed ID: 27095076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Water eDNA metabarcoding is effective in detecting non-native species in marinas, but detection errors still hinder its use for passive monitoring.
    Couton M; Lévêque L; Daguin-Thiébaut C; Comtet T; Viard F
    Biofouling; 2022 Apr; 38(4):367-383. PubMed ID: 35575060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.