BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37184120)

  • 1. Comparison of Complication Rates Between Subpectoral vs Prepectoral Techniques in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.
    Hung YC; McCarthy JT; Park BC; Chaker SC; Saad M; Braun SA; Perdikis G; Higdon K
    Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Oct; 43(11):1285-1292. PubMed ID: 37184120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Historically Controlled, Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes.
    Haddock NT; Kadakia Y; Liu Y; Teotia SS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jul; 148(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 34003807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prepectoral and Subpectoral Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 90-Day Clinical and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes.
    Nelson JA; Shamsunder MG; Vorstenbosch J; Polanco TO; Matros E; Coriddi MR; Mehrara BJ; Allen RJ; Dayan JH; Disa JJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Apr; 149(4):607e-616e. PubMed ID: 35103644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing Expansion Visits in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Expander Placement.
    Wormer BA; Valmadrid AC; Ganesh Kumar N; Al Kassis S; Rankin TM; Kaoutzanis C; Higdon KK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Aug; 144(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 31348326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prepectoral Dual-Port Tissue Expander Placement: Can This Eliminate Suction Drain Use?
    Franck P; Chadab T; Poveromo L; Ellison A; Simmons R; Otterburn DM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Jul; 85(S1 Suppl 1):S60-S62. PubMed ID: 32530848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of 694 Two-Stage Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstructions.
    Asaad M; Yu JZ; Tran JP; Liu J; O'Grady B; Clemens MW; Largo RD; Mericli AF; Schaverien M; Shuck J; Mitchell MP; Butler CE; Selber JC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Oct; 152(4S):43S-54S. PubMed ID: 36877743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of Obesity on Outcomes of Prepectoral vs Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
    Asaad M; Hassan AM; Morris N; Kumar S; Liu J; Butler CE; Selber JC
    Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Sep; 43(10):NP774-NP786. PubMed ID: 37265099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pectoral placement of tissue expanders affects inpatient opioid use.
    Darrach H; Kraenzlin FS; Khavanin N; He W; Lee E; Sacks JM
    Breast J; 2021 Feb; 27(2):126-133. PubMed ID: 33438303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review.
    Poveromo LP; Franck P; Ellison A; Janhofer DE; Asadourian PA; Otterburn DM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 May; 88(3 Suppl 3):S205-S208. PubMed ID: 35513321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Critical Appraisal of Late Complications of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    King CA; Bartholomew AJ; Sosin M; Avila A; Famiglietti AL; Dekker PK; Perez-Alvarez IM; Song DH; Fan KL; Tousimis EA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):9150-9158. PubMed ID: 34386913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should Obesity Be Considered a Contraindication for Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction?
    Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas K; Sharaf B; Nguyen MT; Harless C; Manrique OJ; Martinez-Jorge J; Tran NV
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 145(3):619-627. PubMed ID: 32097293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Single-center Comparison of Surgical Outcomes following Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.
    Villanueva K; Patel H; Ghosh D; Klomhaus A; Slack G; Festekjian J; Da Lio A; Tseng C
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e5880. PubMed ID: 38859804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical Outcomes of Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction in Young Women.
    Manrique OJ; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Nguyen MD; Tran NV; Martinez-Jorge J; Harless C; Sharaf B; Jakub JW; Degnim AC; Boughey JC; Jacobson SR
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2019 Mar; 7(3):e2119. PubMed ID: 31044105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revision Rates in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Delayed-Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
    Patel AA; Cemaj SL; Martin SA; Cheesborough JE; Lee GK; Nazerali RS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 May; 86(5S Suppl 3):S409-S413. PubMed ID: 33833169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction in the Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Plane: An Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes.
    Kraenzlin F; Darrach H; Khavanin N; Kokosis G; Aliu O; Broderick K; Rosson GD; Manahan MA; Sacks JM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jan; 86(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 32568752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Prepectoral and Partial Subpectoral Techniques.
    Nahabedian MY; Cocilovo C
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):22S-30S. PubMed ID: 29166344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subcutaneous Prosthetic Breast Reconstructions following Skin Reduction Mastectomy.
    Komorowska-Timek E; Merrifield B; Turfe Z; Davis AT
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2019 Jan; 7(1):e2078. PubMed ID: 30859037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining the Effects of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
    Patel AA; Arquette CP; Yesantharao PS; Borrelli MR; Broderick KP; Cheesborough JE; Lee GK; Nazerali RS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 May; 86(5S Suppl 3):S390-S394. PubMed ID: 33976068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
    Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.