These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3718426)

  • 1. Single cuff comparison of two methods for indirect measurement of arterial blood pressure: standard auscultatory method versus automatic oscillometric method.
    Pessenhofer H
    Basic Res Cardiol; 1986; 81(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 3718426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auscultatory versus oscillometric measurement of blood pressure in octogenarians.
    Rosholm JU; Arnspang S; Matzen L; Jacobsen IA
    Blood Press; 2012 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 22545576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods.
    Weaver MG; Park MK; Lee DH
    Am J Dis Child; 1990 Aug; 144(8):911-4. PubMed ID: 2378339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of four indirect methods of blood pressure measurement, with hemodynamic correlations.
    Gravlee GP; Brockschmidt JK
    J Clin Monit; 1990 Oct; 6(4):284-98. PubMed ID: 2230858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of an automatic oscillometric method and of various cuffs for the measurement of arterial pressure in the neonate.
    Pellegrini-Caliumi G; Agostino R; Nodari S; Maffei G; Moretti C; Bucci G
    Acta Paediatr Scand; 1982 Sep; 71(5):791-7. PubMed ID: 7180448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of automatic oscillometric arterial pressure measurement with conventional auscultatory measurement in the labour ward.
    Hasan MA; Thomas TA; Prys-Roberts C
    Br J Anaesth; 1993 Feb; 70(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 8435255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of overcuffing on the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Ringrose J; Millay J; Babwick SA; Neil M; Langkaas LA; Padwal R
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2015 Jul; 9(7):563-8. PubMed ID: 26101170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blood pressure measurement by oscillometric and auscultatory methods in normotensive pregnant women.
    Vigato ES; Lamas JLT
    Rev Bras Enferm; 2019 Dec; 72(suppl 3):162-169. PubMed ID: 31851249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of mean arterial pressure from the oscillometric cuff pressure: comparison of different techniques.
    Zheng D; Amoore JN; Mieke S; Murray A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2011 Jan; 49(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 21042950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressures.
    Park MK; Menard SW; Yuan C
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2001 Jan; 155(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 11177062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
    Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of semiautomatic and automatic devices for home blood pressure measurement: comparison between cuff-oscillometric and microphone methods.
    Imai Y; Abe K; Sasaki S; Minami N; Munakata M; Sakuma H; Hashimoto J; Sekino H; Imai K; Yoshinaga K
    J Hypertens; 1989 Dec; 7(12):983-90. PubMed ID: 2628499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor in adults and children based on the 1992 AAMI SP-10 standards.
    Ling J; Ohara Y; Orime Y; Noon GP; Takatani S
    J Clin Monit; 1995 Mar; 11(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 7760085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is one measurement enough to evaluate blood pressure among adolescents? A blood pressure screening experience in more than 9000 children with a subset comparison of auscultatory to mercury measurements.
    Negroni-Balasquide X; Bell CS; Samuel J; Samuels JA
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2016 Feb; 10(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 26875474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biases in the measurement of arterial pressure.
    Finnie KJ; Watts DG; Armstrong PW
    Crit Care Med; 1984 Nov; 12(11):965-8. PubMed ID: 6499482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Cuff Design on Auscultatory and Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurements.
    Ringrose JS; McLean D; Ao P; Yousefi F; Sankaralingam S; Millay J; Padwal R
    Am J Hypertens; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1063-9. PubMed ID: 27099256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the validity of oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement in a large population-based epidemiologic study.
    Chen Z; Wang X; Wang Z; Zhang L; Hao G; Dong Y; Zhu M; Gao R;
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2017 Nov; 11(11):730-736.e4. PubMed ID: 29032943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.