195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37184821)
1. Priority setting in the German healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment.
Meusel V; Mentzakis E; Baji P; Fiorentini G; Paolucci F
Int J Health Econ Manag; 2023 Sep; 23(3):411-431. PubMed ID: 37184821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency.
Mirelman A; Mentzakis E; Kinter E; Paolucci F; Fordham R; Ozawa S; Ferraz M; Baltussen R; Niessen LW
Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 22583464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Priority setting in the Austrian healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment and implications for mental health.
Mentzakis E; Paolucci F; Rubicko G
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2014 Jun; 17(2):61-73. PubMed ID: 25153094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of decision maker preferences for equity/efficiency attributes in reimbursement decisions in three European countries.
Baji P; García-Goñi M; Gulácsi L; Mentzakis E; Paolucci F
Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Sep; 17(7):791-9. PubMed ID: 26296623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficiency and equity considerations in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel.
Shmueli A; Golan O; Paolucci F; Mentzakis E
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017; 6():18. PubMed ID: 28373904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Equity and efficiency preferences of health policy makers in China--a stated preference analysis.
Paolucci F; Mentzakis E; Defechereux T; Niessen LW
Health Policy Plan; 2015 Oct; 30(8):1059-66. PubMed ID: 25500745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of information and deliberation on the consistency of preferences for prioritization in health care - evidence from discrete choice experiments undertaken alongside citizens' juries.
Whitty JA; Littlejohns P; Ratcliffe J; Rixon K; Wilson A; Kendall E; Burton P; Chalkidou K; Scuffham PA
J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1237-1249. PubMed ID: 37738383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dear policy maker: have you made up your mind? A discrete choice experiment among policy makers and other health professionals.
Koopmanschap MA; Stolk EA; Koolman X
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Apr; 26(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20392324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis.
Defechereux T; Paolucci F; Mirelman A; Youngkong S; Botten G; Hagen TP; Niessen LW
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Feb; 12():39. PubMed ID: 22335815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany - a discrete choice experiment.
Krinke KS; Tangermann U; Amelung VE; Krauth C
BMC Fam Pract; 2019 Jun; 20(1):80. PubMed ID: 31185940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Balancing equity and efficiency in health priorities in Ghana: the use of multicriteria decision analysis.
Jehu-Appiah C; Baltussen R; Acquah C; Aikins M; d'Almeida SA; Bosu WK; Koolman X; Lauer J; Osei D; Adjei S
Value Health; 2008 Dec; 11(7):1081-7. PubMed ID: 19602214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prioritising health service innovation investments using public preferences: a discrete choice experiment.
Erdem S; Thompson C
BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Aug; 14():360. PubMed ID: 25167926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
Ryan M; Scott DA; Reeves C; Bate A; van Teijlingen ER; Russell EM; Napper M; Robb CM
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(5):1-186. PubMed ID: 11262422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eliciting societal preferences of reimbursement decision criteria for anti cancer drugs in South Korea.
Kwon SH; Park SK; Byun JH; Lee EK
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2017 Aug; 17(4):411-419. PubMed ID: 28019130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preferences for antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C: a discrete choice experiment.
Mühlbacher AC; Bridges JF; Bethge S; Dintsios CM; Schwalm A; Gerber-Grote A; Nübling M
Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Mar; 18(2):155-165. PubMed ID: 26846922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-criteria decision analysis for setting priorities on HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand.
Youngkong S; Teerawattananon Y; Tantivess S; Baltussen R
Health Res Policy Syst; 2012 Feb; 10():6. PubMed ID: 22339981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using a stated preference discrete choice experiment to assess societal value from the perspective of decision-makers in Europe. Does it work for rare diseases?
López-Bastida J; Ramos-Goñi JM; Aranda-Reneo I; Trapero-Bertran M; Kanavos P; Rodriguez Martin B
Health Policy; 2019 Feb; 123(2):152-158. PubMed ID: 30528244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Priority setting and rationing of pharmaceuticals - an experimental analysis of discussion processes].
Aumann I; Litzkendorf S; Damm K; von der Schulenburg JMG
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2017 Aug; 125():3-13. PubMed ID: 28694036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) for health technology assessment: the Queensland Health experience.
Howard S; Scott IA; Ju H; McQueen L; Scuffham PA
Aust Health Rev; 2019 Oct; 43(5):591-599. PubMed ID: 30205873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards a multi-criteria approach for priority setting: an application to Ghana.
Baltussen R; Stolk E; Chisholm D; Aikins M
Health Econ; 2006 Jul; 15(7):689-96. PubMed ID: 16491464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
