These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37185303)

  • 1. External validation of Glasgow-Blatchford, modified Glasgow-Blatchford and CANUKA scores to identify low-risk patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study.
    Pognonec C; Dirhoussi Z; Cury N; Moreau M; Billard C; Yordanov Y; Thiebaud PC
    Emerg Med J; 2023 Jun; 40(6):451-457. PubMed ID: 37185303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development, Validation, and Comparative Assessment of an International Scoring System to Determine Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Oakland K; Kahan BC; Guizzetti L; Martel M; Bryant RV; Brahmania M; Singh S; Nguyen NQ; Sey MSL; Barkun A; Jairath V
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 17(6):1121-1129.e2. PubMed ID: 30268566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Ko IG; Kim SE; Chang BS; Kwak MS; Yoon JY; Cha JM; Shin HP; Lee JI; Kim SH; Han JH; Jeon JW
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland.
    Rivieri S; Carron PN; Schoepfer A; Ageron FX
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2023 Feb; 30(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 36542335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?
    Le Jeune IR; Gordon AL; Farrugia D; Manwani R; Guha IN; James MW
    Acute Med; 2011; 10(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 22111089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems.
    Cheng DW; Lu YW; Teller T; Sekhon HK; Wu BU
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Oct; 36(8):782-9. PubMed ID: 22928529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Bozkurt S; Köse A; Arslan ED; Erdoğan S; Üçbilek E; Çevik İ; Ayrık C; Sezgin O
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2015 Dec; 23():109. PubMed ID: 26714636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.
    Tantai XX; Liu N; Yang LB; Wei ZC; Xiao CL; Song YH; Wang JH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 25(45):6668-6680. PubMed ID: 31832005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
    Rout G; Sharma S; Gunjan D; Kedia S; Nayak B; Shalimar
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L; Xu F; Yuan J
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the quick SOFA score with Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scores in predicting severity in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Taslidere B; Sonmez E; Özcan AB; Mehmetaj L; Keskin EB; Gulen B
    Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 45():29-36. PubMed ID: 33647759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. External validation of the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score and the Rockall Score in the US setting.
    Chandra S; Hess EP; Agarwal D; Nestler DM; Montori VM; Song LM; Wells GA; Stiell IG
    Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Jun; 30(5):673-9. PubMed ID: 21641145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical utility of the Glasgow Blatchford Score in patients presenting to the emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A retrospective cohort study.
    Ryan K; Malacova E; Appleyard M; Brown AF; Song L; Grimpen F
    Emerg Med Australas; 2021 Oct; 33(5):817-825. PubMed ID: 33543572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective multicenter validation of the Glasgow Blatchford bleeding score in the management of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presenting at an emergency department.
    Aquarius M; Smeets FG; Konijn HW; Stassen PM; Keulen ET; Van Deursen CT; Masclee AA; Keulemans YC
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Sep; 27(9):1011-6. PubMed ID: 26049709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study.
    Zhong M; Chen WJ; Lu XY; Qian J; Zhu CQ
    J Dig Dis; 2016 Dec; 17(12):820-828. PubMed ID: 27930875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a Machine Learning Model That Outperforms Clinical Risk Scoring Systems for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Shung DL; Au B; Taylor RA; Tay JK; Laursen SB; Stanley AJ; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Schultz M; Laine L
    Gastroenterology; 2020 Jan; 158(1):160-167. PubMed ID: 31562847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcome at upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in an emergency unit.
    Dicu D; Pop F; Ionescu D; Dicu T
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Jan; 31(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 23000328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.