165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37186266)
1. Comparison of performance between O-RADS, IOTA simple rules risk assessment and ADNEX model in the discrimination of ovarian Brenner tumors.
Shang J; Lei T; Wu L; Lin M; Xie H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Sep; 308(3):961-970. PubMed ID: 37186266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.
Yoeli-Bik R; Longman RE; Wroblewski K; Weigert M; Abramowicz JS; Lengyel E
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2323289. PubMed ID: 37440228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Xie WT; Wang YQ; Xiang ZS; Du ZS; Huang SX; Chen YJ; Tang LN
J Ovarian Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 35067220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX: a Portuguese multicenter study.
Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective comparative trial comparing O-RADS, IOTA ADNEX model, and RMI score for preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses for prediction of ovarian cancer.
Poonyakanok V; Tanmahasamut P; Jaishuen A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 May; 49(5):1412-1417. PubMed ID: 36895122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External Validation of O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System.
Hack K; Gandhi N; Bouchard-Fortier G; Chawla TP; Ferguson SE; Li S; Kahn D; Tyrrell PN; Glanc P
Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):114-120. PubMed ID: 35438559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of Ultrasound Scores (Subjective Assessment, Simple Rules Risk Assessment, ADNEX Model, O-RADS) to Adnexal Masses of Difficult Classification.
Pelayo M; Sancho-Sauco J; Sánchez-Zurdo J; Perez-Mies B; Abarca-Martínez L; Cancelo-Hidalgo MJ; Sainz-Bueno JA; Alcázar JL; Pelayo-Delgado I
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 37685323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of adnexal lesions using photoacoustic imaging to improve sonographic O-RADS risk assessment.
Zhu Q; Luo H; Middleton WD; Itani M; Hagemann IS; Hagemann AR; Hoegger MJ; Thaker PH; Kuroki LM; MCourt CK; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Siegel CL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 62(6):891-903. PubMed ID: 37606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance of IOTA SR and O-RADS combined with CA125, HE4, and risk of malignancy algorithm to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Yang Y; Ju H; Huang Y
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110926. PubMed ID: 37418798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX model and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System with final histological diagnosis in adnexal masses: a retrospective study.
Filiz AA; Kahyaoglu S; Atalay CR
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2024 Jan; 67(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 37822234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging in gynecological disease (7): clinical and ultrasound features of Brenner tumors of the ovary.
Dierickx I; Valentin L; Van Holsbeke C; Jacomen G; Lissoni AA; Licameli A; Testa A; Bourne T; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Dec; 40(6):706-13. PubMed ID: 22407678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of O-RADS Ultrasound and O-RADS MRI for Risk Assessment of Ovarian and Adnexal Lesions.
Zhang Q; Dai X; Li W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jul; 221(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 36722758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the O-RADS and ADNEX models regarding malignancy rate and validity in evaluating adnexal lesions.
Chen GY; Hsu TF; Chan IS; Liu CH; Chao WT; Shih YC; Jiang LY; Chang YH; Wang PH; Chen YJ
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7854-7864. PubMed ID: 35583711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subjective assessment and IOTA ADNEX model in evaluation of adnexal masses in patients with history of breast cancer.
Pozzati F; Sassu CM; Marini G; Mascilini F; Biscione A; Giannarelli D; Garganese G; Fragomeni SM; Scambia G; Testa AC; Moro F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 62(4):594-602. PubMed ID: 37204769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: validation of O-RADS and comparison with ADNEX model, SA, and RMI.
Wang R; Yang Z
Ginekol Pol; 2023; 94(10):799-806. PubMed ID: 36929789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of IOTA score and ADNEX model in the screening of ovarian malignancy in postmenopausal women.
Nohuz E; De Simone L; Chêne G
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 48(2):103-107. PubMed ID: 29709594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
