150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37186418)
1. Rapid on-site evaluation improves the sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid pancreatic lesions irrespective of technique: A single-centre experience.
Milluzzo SM; Olivari N; Rossi G; Bianchi D; Liserre B; Graffeo M; Lovera M; Correale L; Hassan C; Spada C
Cytopathology; 2023 Jul; 34(4):318-324. PubMed ID: 37186418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Zhang S; Ni M; Wang P; Zheng J; Sun Q; Xu G; Peng C; Shen S; Zhang W; Huang S; Wang L; Zou X; Lv Y
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1975-1982. PubMed ID: 35614028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T
World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic ability and factors affecting accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid lesions: Japanese large single center experience.
Haba S; Yamao K; Bhatia V; Mizuno N; Hara K; Hijioka S; Imaoka H; Niwa Y; Tajika M; Kondo S; Tanaka T; Shimizu Y; Yatabe Y; Hosoda W; Kawakami H; Sakamoto N
J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):973-81. PubMed ID: 23090002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy was not more cost-effective than fine-needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation in gastrointestinal lesions diagnosis.
Sbeit W; Khoury T
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Aug; 49(8):944-947. PubMed ID: 33973746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Evaluation of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Versus Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
Caymaz I; Afandiyeva N
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2023 Nov; 46(11):1596-1602. PubMed ID: 37464106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration in gastrointestinal lesions.
Khoury T; Sbeit W
Cytopathology; 2021 May; 32(3):326-330. PubMed ID: 33606331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C
Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid On-Site Evaluation by Endosonographer of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Nebel JA; Soldan M; Dumonceau JM; de Souza Carvalho CE; Chagas VLA; de Assis PG; Lapa E Silva JR; Rezende GFDM
Pancreas; 2021 Jul; 50(6):815-821. PubMed ID: 34347723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cytology with rapid on-site examination (ROSE) does not improve diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of pancreatic cystic lesions.
Estrada P; Benson M; Gopal D; Buehler D; Pfau P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 31356003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors Influencing the Diagnostic Performance of Repeat Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration/Biopsy after the First Inconclusive Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions.
Cho JH; Kim J; Lee HS; Ryu SJ; Jang SI; Kim EJ; Kang H; Lee SS; Song TJ; Bang S
Gut Liver; 2024 Jan; 18(1):184-191. PubMed ID: 37317559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid on-site evaluation for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of the pancreas decreases the incidence of repeat biopsy procedures.
Collins BT; Murad FM; Wang JF; Bernadt CT
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Sep; 121(9):518-24. PubMed ID: 23983161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic ultrasound core needle for diagnosing of solid pancreatic lesions: is rapid on-site evaluation really necessary?
Arena M; Eusebi LH; Pellicano R; Palamara MA; Iabichino G; Consolo P; Fagoonee S; Opocher E; Barabino M; Luigiano C
Minerva Med; 2017 Dec; 108(6):547-553. PubMed ID: 28750500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic-ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of pancreatic masses.
Iglesias-Garcia J; Lariño-Noia J; Abdulkader I; Domínguez-Muñoz JE
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 20(28):9451-7. PubMed ID: 25071339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of rapid on-site evaluation on diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: experience from a single center.
Guvendir I; Zemheri IE; Ozdil K
BMC Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 22(1):264. PubMed ID: 35624440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]