These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37186795)

  • 1. Informed Consent and Debriefing When Deceiving Participants: A Systematic Review of Research Ethics Guidelines.
    Verbeke K; Krawczyk T; Baeyens D; Piasecki J; Borry P
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2023 Jul; 18(3):118-133. PubMed ID: 37186795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Debriefing and accountability in deceptive research.
    Miller FG; Gluck JP; Wendler D
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2008 Sep; 18(3):235-51. PubMed ID: 18935922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
    Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Internet research: an opportunity to revisit classic ethical problems in behavioral research.
    Pittenger DJ
    Ethics Behav; 2003; 13(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 14552304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adherence with reporting of ethical standards in COVID-19 human studies: a rapid review.
    O'Sullivan L; Killeen RP; Doran P; Crowley RK
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Jun; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 34182962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experiments to answer questions raised by the use of deception in psychological research. I. Role playing as an alternative to deception. II. Effectiveness of debriefing after a deception. 3. Effect of informed consent on deception.
    Holmes DS; Bennett DH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1974 Mar; 29(3):358-67. PubMed ID: 4814125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethics and Phishing Experiments.
    Resnik DB; Finn PR
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Aug; 24(4):1241-1252. PubMed ID: 28812222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deceiving Research Participants: Is It Inconsistent With Valid Consent?
    Wendler D
    J Med Philos; 2022 Nov; 47(4):558-571. PubMed ID: 36333927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When is it impractical to ask informed consent? A systematic review.
    Laurijssen SJ; van der Graaf R; van Dijk WB; Schuit E; Groenwold RH; Grobbee DE; de Vries MC
    Clin Trials; 2022 Oct; 19(5):545-560. PubMed ID: 35775421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why is Coerced Consent Worse Than No Consent and Deceived Consent?
    Wendler D; Wertheimer A
    J Med Philos; 2017 Apr; 42(2):114-131. PubMed ID: 28201684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical and definitional considerations in research on child sexual violence in India.
    Dayal R; Kalokhe AS; Choudhry V; Pillai D; Beier K; Patel V
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Sep; 18(1):1144. PubMed ID: 30261867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The case for deception in medical experimentation.
    Newell JD
    Philos Context; 1984; 14():51-9. PubMed ID: 11651861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electronic informed consent criteria for research ethics review: a scoping review.
    Yusof MYPM; Teo CH; Ng CJ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):117. PubMed ID: 36414962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Moral accountability and debriefing.
    Benham B
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2008 Sep; 18(3):253-73. PubMed ID: 18935923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two arguments for 'covert methods' in social research.
    Herrera CD
    Br J Sociol; 1999 Jun; 50(2):331-43. PubMed ID: 15260029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Researchers' views on, and experiences with, the requirement to obtain informed consent in research involving human participants: a qualitative study.
    Xu A; Baysari MT; Stocker SL; Leow LJ; Day RO; Carland JE
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Oct; 21(1):93. PubMed ID: 33008387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed consent in cluster randomised trials: new and common ethical challenges.
    Lignou S
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 44(2):114-120. PubMed ID: 28780528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed consent for clinical trials: a review.
    Lema VM; Mbondo M; Kamau EM
    East Afr Med J; 2009 Mar; 86(3):133-42. PubMed ID: 19702101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Exception to informed consent in research: when is this possible in Chile?].
    Zúñiga C; Zúñiga-Hernández J
    Rev Med Chil; 2019 Aug; 147(8):1029-1035. PubMed ID: 31859968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Waiver of informed consent in pediatric resuscitation research: a systematic review.
    Eltorki M; Uleryk E; Freedman SB
    Acad Emerg Med; 2013 Aug; 20(8):822-34. PubMed ID: 24033626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.