These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37187639)

  • 1. A Comparative Study on the Shaping Ability and Cleaning Efficiency of Two Different Single-File Systems, Reciprocating Wave One Versus Continuous Rotation F360, Evaluated by Scanning Electron Microscope: An In Vitro Study.
    Samudrala A; Majeti C; Chowdary KH; Potru LB; Yaragani A; Kumar YP; Sidhu GK; Kathuria NS
    Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37503. PubMed ID: 37187639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Cleaning Efficiency of Root Canal Using Different Rotary NiTi Instrumentation System: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.
    Agrawal S; Bichpuriya A; Maria R
    Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24200. PubMed ID: 35602820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of five single-file systems in the preparation of severely curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
    Liu Y; Chen M; Tang W; Liu C; Du M
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):649. PubMed ID: 36577985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of S-One and WaveOne File Systems Using Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis: An
    Ramachandran SS; Koshy CR; Narayanan S; Venkatesh B; Sundaran RM; Karumaran CS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):841-845. PubMed ID: 33568602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of cleaning efficiency of single file NiTi rotary system during root canal treatment procedure - A scanning electron microscope study.
    Vashisht R; Kumar U; Jhamb S; Singla R
    J Conserv Dent; 2023; 26(3):316-320. PubMed ID: 37398853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. F360 and F6 Skytaper: SEM evaluation of cleaning efficiency.
    Dagna A; Gastaldo G; Beltrami R; Chiesa M; Poggio C
    Ann Stomatol (Roma); 2015; 6(3-4):69-74. PubMed ID: 26941891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Evaluation of Debris Extrusion, Remaining Dentin Thickness and Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Rotary and Reciprocating Endodontic File Systems: An In Vitro Study.
    Jaggi P; Mulay S; Tandale A; Jadhao R; Joshi P; Aras S; Krishnakumar K; Krishna V
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42290. PubMed ID: 37609092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Canal-centering Ability and Apical Transportation of Hyflex-EDM, OneShape, WaveOne Gold, and Reciproc Files: An
    Subramanian A; Balasubramanian R; Jayakumar S; Harikrishnan S; Chandrasekaran R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Oct; 24(10):802-808. PubMed ID: 38152914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.
    Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K
    J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison and evaluation of two reciprocating root canal instruments on removal of smear layer by using two irrigants at apical one-third of the root canal-an ex vivo-scanning electron microscopic study.
    Jimna MM; Ashwini TS; Sowmya HK
    J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(6):451-458. PubMed ID: 29430100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of debris and smear layer generated by two instruments used in reciprocating motion WaveOne Gold® and Reciproc Blue®.
    Feghali M; Jabbour E; Koyess E; Sabbagh J
    Aust Endod J; 2019 Dec; 45(3):388-393. PubMed ID: 30770606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of curved root canals preparation using reciprocating, continuous and an association of motions.
    Hoppe CB; Böttcher DE; Justo AM; Só MV; Grecca FS
    Scanning; 2016 Sep; 38(5):462-468. PubMed ID: 26750106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Debris Evaluation after Root Canal Shaping with Rotating and Reciprocating Single-File Systems.
    Dagna A; Gastaldo G; Beltrami R; Poggio C
    J Funct Biomater; 2016 Oct; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 27763503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Apical debris extrusion associated with oval shaped canals: a comparative study of WaveOne vs Self-Adjusting File.
    Farmakis ET; Sotiropoulos GG; Abràmovitz I; Solomonov M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2131-2138. PubMed ID: 26759337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An
    Bakthavatchalam B; Ranjani MS; Amudhalakshmi K
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2019; 10(3):542-547. PubMed ID: 32308334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Apically Extruded Debris in Curved Root Canals Using the WaveOne Gold Reciprocating and Twisted File Adaptive Systems.
    Boijink D; Costa DD; Hoppe CB; Kopper PMP; Grecca FS
    J Endod; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1289-1292. PubMed ID: 29908692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Smear layer removal in canals shaped with reciprocating rotary systems.
    Amaral P; Forner L; Llena C
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2013 Dec; 5(5):e227-30. PubMed ID: 24455087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.