These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37188836)

  • 21. Clinician Perspectives on an Electronic Portal to Improve Communication with Patients and Families in the Intensive Care Unit.
    Bell SK; Roche SD; Johansson AC; O'Reilly KP; Lee BS; Sands KE; Talmor DS; Brown SM
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Dec; 13(12):2197-2206. PubMed ID: 27700144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A qualitative exploration of the discharge process and factors predisposing to readmissions to the intensive care unit.
    Ofoma UR; Dong Y; Gajic O; Pickering BW
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jan; 18(1):6. PubMed ID: 29304857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. From breaking point to breakthrough during the ICU stay: A qualitative study of family members' experiences of long-term intensive care patients' pathways towards survival.
    Haugdahl HS; Eide R; Alexandersen I; Paulsby TE; Stjern B; Lund SB; Haugan G
    J Clin Nurs; 2018 Oct; 27(19-20):3630-3640. PubMed ID: 29775992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improving Nurse Satisfaction With Open Visitation in an Adult Intensive Care Unit.
    Kozub E; Scheler S; Necoechea G; OʼByrne N
    Crit Care Nurs Q; 2017; 40(2):144-154. PubMed ID: 28240697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using experience-based co-design to prioritise areas for improvement for patients recovering from critical illness.
    Twamley J; Monks R; Beaver K
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2023 Jun; 76():103390. PubMed ID: 36706498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Flexible visiting positively impacted on patients, families and staff in an Australian Intensive Care Unit: A before-after mixed method study.
    Mitchell ML; Aitken LM
    Aust Crit Care; 2017 Mar; 30(2):91-97. PubMed ID: 26861141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evolution in Care Delivery within Critical Illness Recovery Programs during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.
    Eaton TL; Sevin CM; Hope AA; Alexander S; Iwashyna TJ; Boehm LM; McPeake J
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2022 Nov; 19(11):1900-1906. PubMed ID: 35731631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nurses' communication with families in the intensive care unit - a literature review.
    Adams A; Mannix T; Harrington A
    Nurs Crit Care; 2017 Mar; 22(2):70-80. PubMed ID: 25583405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patients' and Caregivers' Perceptions of Intensive Care Unit Hospitalization and Recovery.
    Kovaleva MA; Jones AC; Kimpel CC; Lauderdale JL; Sevin CM; Boehm LM
    Am J Crit Care; 2022 Jul; 31(4):319-323. PubMed ID: 35773198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Administrator Perspectives on ICU-to-Ward Transfers and Content Contained in Existing Transfer Tools: a Cross-sectional Survey.
    Boyd JM; Roberts DJ; Parsons Leigh J; Stelfox HT
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1738-1745. PubMed ID: 30051330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Searching for meaning: A grounded theory of family resilience in adult ICU.
    Wong P; Liamputtong P; Koch S; Rawson H
    J Clin Nurs; 2019 Mar; 28(5-6):781-791. PubMed ID: 30207613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Family members' perceptions of counselling during visits to loved ones in an adult ICU.
    Vanhanen M; Meriläinen MH; Ala-Kokko T; Kyngäs H; Kaakinen P
    Nurs Open; 2023 Jul; 10(7):4859-4867. PubMed ID: 37018387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visits to intensive care unit patients--frequency, duration and impact on outcome.
    Eriksson T; Bergbom I
    Nurs Crit Care; 2007; 12(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17883660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study.
    van Sluisveld N; Oerlemans A; Westert G; van der Hoeven JG; Wollersheim H; Zegers M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Apr; 17(1):251. PubMed ID: 28376872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Finding a Middle Ground: Exploring the Impact of Patient- and Family-Centered Design on Nurse-Family Interactions in the Neuro ICU.
    Rippin AS; Zimring C; Samuels O; Denham ME
    HERD; 2015; 9(1):80-98. PubMed ID: 26187793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. 'Providing good and comfortable care by building a bond of trust': nurses views regarding their role in patients' perception of safety in the intensive care unit.
    Wassenaar A; van den Boogaard M; van der Hooft T; Pickkers P; Schoonhoven L
    J Clin Nurs; 2015 Nov; 24(21-22):3233-44. PubMed ID: 26374345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Promoting patient- and family-centered care services in intensive care unit].
    Ji H; Zhao H; An Y
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2019 Apr; 31(4):397-399. PubMed ID: 31109408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The impact of family care visitation programme on patients and caregivers in the intensive care unit: A mixed methods study.
    Yoo HJ; Shim J
    J Clin Nurs; 2023 Jul; 32(13-14):3797-3809. PubMed ID: 36876455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Randomized, controlled trials of interventions to improve communication in intensive care: a systematic review.
    Scheunemann LP; McDevitt M; Carson SS; Hanson LC
    Chest; 2011 Mar; 139(3):543-554. PubMed ID: 21106660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Needs of Family Members of Intensive Care Patients.
    Jafarpoor H; Manoochehri H; Vasli P
    Crit Care Nurs Q; 2023 Apr-Jun 01; 46(2):176-184. PubMed ID: 36823744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.