338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37188881)
1. Effect of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis on the screening outcomes of digital mammography: a matched cohort study.
Kim H; Choi JS; Kim K; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK
Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7186-7198. PubMed ID: 37188881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic Surveillance After Breast-Conserving Therapy: Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection.
Yoon JH; Kim EK; Kim GR; Han K; Moon HJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jan; 218(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 34378399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study.
Lång K; Josefsson V; Larsson AM; Larsson S; Högberg C; Sartor H; Hofvind S; Andersson I; Rosso A
Lancet Oncol; 2023 Aug; 24(8):936-944. PubMed ID: 37541274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stand-Alone Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Retrospective Evaluation.
Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Raya-Povedano JL; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34904872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of real-life use of artificial intelligence as support for human reading in a population-based breast cancer screening program with mammography and tomosynthesis.
Elías-Cabot E; Romero-Martín S; Raya-Povedano JL; Brehl AK; Álvarez-Benito M
Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37975920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial intelligence (AI) for breast cancer screening: BreastScreen population-based cohort study of cancer detection.
Marinovich ML; Wylie E; Lotter W; Lund H; Waddell A; Madeley C; Pereira G; Houssami N
EBioMedicine; 2023 Apr; 90():104498. PubMed ID: 36863255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of AI for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Detection and Interpretation Time.
Park EK; Kwak S; Lee W; Choi JS; Kooi T; Kim EK
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230318. PubMed ID: 38568095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparisons between artificial intelligence computer-aided detection synthesized mammograms and digital mammograms when used alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images in a virtual screening setting.
Uematsu T; Nakashima K; Harada TL; Nasu H; Igarashi T
Jpn J Radiol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 36068450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AI-based Strategies to Reduce Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography and Tomosynthesis: A Retrospective Evaluation.
Raya-Povedano JL; Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 33944627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An Artificial Intelligence-based Mammography Screening Protocol for Breast Cancer: Outcome and Radiologist Workload.
Lauritzen AD; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; von Euler-Chelpin MC; Lynge E; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M
Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 35438561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial intelligence computer-aided detection enhances synthesized mammograms: comparison with original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images in an experimental setting.
Uematsu T; Nakashima K; Harada TL; Nasu H; Igarashi T
Breast Cancer; 2023 Jan; 30(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 36001270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms.
Schaffter T; Buist DSM; Lee CI; Nikulin Y; Ribli D; Guan Y; Lotter W; Jie Z; Du H; Wang S; Feng J; Feng M; Kim HE; Albiol F; Albiol A; Morrell S; Wojna Z; Ahsen ME; Asif U; Jimeno Yepes A; Yohanandan S; Rabinovici-Cohen S; Yi D; Hoff B; Yu T; Chaibub Neto E; Rubin DL; Lindholm P; Margolies LR; McBride RB; Rothstein JH; Sieh W; Ben-Ari R; Harrer S; Trister A; Friend S; Norman T; Sahiner B; Strand F; Guinney J; Stolovitzky G; ; Mackey L; Cahoon J; Shen L; Sohn JH; Trivedi H; Shen Y; Buturovic L; Pereira JC; Cardoso JS; Castro E; Kalleberg KT; Pelka O; Nedjar I; Geras KJ; Nensa F; Goan E; Koitka S; Caballero L; Cox DD; Krishnaswamy P; Pandey G; Friedrich CM; Perrin D; Fookes C; Shi B; Cardoso Negrie G; Kawczynski M; Cho K; Khoo CS; Lo JY; Sorensen AG; Jung H
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Mar; 3(3):e200265. PubMed ID: 32119094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study.
Kim HE; Kim HH; Han BK; Kim KH; Han K; Nam H; Lee EH; Kim EK
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Mar; 2(3):e138-e148. PubMed ID: 33334578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of novel artificial intelligence computer-assisted detection (AI-CAD) for screening mammography: an analysis of 17,884 consecutive two-view full-field digital mammography screening exams.
Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hacker A; Jänsch A; Hertlein M; Mieskes C; Elsner S; Sinnatamby R; Katalinic A
Acta Radiol; 2023 Oct; 64(10):2697-2703. PubMed ID: 37642981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of different reading strategies implementing artificial intelligence.
Dahlblom V; Dustler M; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3754-3765. PubMed ID: 36502459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved Cancer Detection Using Artificial Intelligence: a Retrospective Evaluation of Missed Cancers on Mammography.
Watanabe AT; Lim V; Vu HX; Chim R; Weise E; Liu J; Bradley WG; Comstock CE
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):625-637. PubMed ID: 31011956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can we reduce the workload of mammographic screening by automatic identification of normal exams with artificial intelligence? A feasibility study.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Lång K; Gubern-Merida A; Teuwen J; Broeders M; Gennaro G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Chevalier M; Mertelmeier T; Wallis MG; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4825-4832. PubMed ID: 30993432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening in Patients With Dense Breasts: Comparison of Mammography, Artificial Intelligence, and Supplementary Ultrasound.
Lee SE; Yoon JH; Son NH; Han K; Moon HJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Jan; 222(1):e2329655. PubMed ID: 37493324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences and similarities in false interpretations by AI CAD and radiologists in screening mammography.
Salim M; Dembrower K; Eklund M; Smith K; Strand F
Br J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 96(1151):20230210. PubMed ID: 37660400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms.
Salim M; Wåhlin E; Dembrower K; Azavedo E; Foukakis T; Liu Y; Smith K; Eklund M; Strand F
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Oct; 6(10):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 32852536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
