These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37189005)

  • 1. Effect of Type of Resin Composite Material on Porosity, Interfacial Gaps and Microhardness of Small Class I Restorations.
    Alkhubaizi Q; Alomari Q; Sabti MY; Melo MA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Jan; 24(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 37189005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in Class I restorations.
    Miguez PA; Pereira PN; Foxton RM; Walter R; Nunes MF; Swift EJ
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):839-45. PubMed ID: 15451239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of various placement techniques on the microhardness of Class II (slot) resin composite restorations.
    Moosavi H; Abedini S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Sep; 10(5):E009-16. PubMed ID: 19838605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of flowable composite lining on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations.
    Korkmaz Y; Ozel E; Attar N
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Apr; 9(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 17489480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.
    Ilie N; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21194743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of flowable composite and restorative technique on microleakage of class II restorations.
    Hernandes NM; Catelan A; Soares GP; Ambrosano GM; Lima DA; Marchi GM; Martins LR; Aguiar FH
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 23946230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of Resin Composite Viscosity and Fill-technique on Internal Gap in Class I Restorations: An OCT Evaluation.
    Kantovitz KR; Cabral LL; Carlos NR; de Freitas AZ; Peruzzo DC; Franca F; do Amaral F; Basting RT; Puppin-Rontani RM
    Oper Dent; 2021 Sep; 46(5):537-546. PubMed ID: 34929042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill resin composites.
    Fronza BM; Rueggeberg FA; Braga RR; Mogilevych B; Soares LE; Martin AA; Ambrosano G; Giannini M
    Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1542-51. PubMed ID: 26608118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flowable fiber-reinforced versus flowable bulk-fill resin composites: Degree of conversion and microtensile bond strength to dentin in high C-factor cavities.
    Harp YS; Montaser MA; Zaghloul NM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):699-706. PubMed ID: 35274436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of fiber placement or flowable resin lining on microleakage in Class II adhesive restorations.
    Belli S; Orucoglu H; Yildirim C; Eskitascioglu G
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Apr; 9(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 17489478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs.
    Sadeghi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Internal Adaptation of Cusp-weakened Class I Preparations Restored with Bulk-fill, Bi-layered, and Incremental Restorative Techniques: A Micro-CT Analysis.
    Floriani DH; Rached RN; Ignácio SA; Souza EM
    Oper Dent; 2022 Sep; 47(5):527-534. PubMed ID: 36121720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate versus water-storage performance of Class V flowable composite restoratives.
    Irie M; Hatanaka K; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2006 Sep; 22(9):875-83. PubMed ID: 16837038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of pre-heating resin composite on restoration microleakage.
    Wagner WC; Aksu MN; Neme AM; Linger JB; Pink FE; Walker S
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 18335736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-year clinical evaluation of two flowable composites.
    Gallo JR; Burgess JO; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Maltezos MB; Mercante DE; Davidson JM
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Jun; 41(6):497-503. PubMed ID: 20490392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage in class II restorations of two bulk fill resin composites and a conventional nanohybrid resin composite: an in vitro study at 10,000 thermocycles.
    Cayo-Rojas CF; Hernández-Caba KK; Aliaga-Mariñas AS; Ladera-Castañeda MI; Cervantes-Ganoza LA
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):619. PubMed ID: 34861859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Porosities and voids in Class I restorations placed by six operators using a packable or syringable composite.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Joosten M; Veeke Ov
    Dent Mater; 2002 Jan; 18(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11740965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.