122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37189301)
21. Evaluation of primary prostate cancer using 11C-methionine-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT.
Shiiba M; Ishihara K; Kimura G; Kuwako T; Yoshihara H; Sato H; Kondo Y; Tsuchiya S; Kumita S
Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Feb; 26(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 22069194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Prognostic Value of Posttreatment
Pathmanandavel S; Crumbaker M; Nguyen A; Yam AO; Wilson P; Niman R; Ayers M; Sharma S; Eu P; Martin AJ; Stockler MR; Joshua AM; Emmett L
J Nucl Med; 2023 Jan; 64(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 35738906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. One-month assessment of renal cell carcinoma treated by everolimus using FDG PET/CT predicts progression-free and overall survival.
Ito H; Kondo K; Kawahara T; Kaneta T; Tateishi U; Ueno D; Namura K; Kobayashi K; Miyoshi Y; Yumura Y; Makiyama K; Hayashi N; Hasumi H; Osaka K; Yokomizo Y; Teranishi JI; Hattori Y; Inoue T; Uemura H; Yao M; Nakaigawa N
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2017 May; 79(5):855-861. PubMed ID: 28331985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic utility of metabolic parameters on FDG PET/CT for lymph node metastasis in patients with cN2 non-small cell lung cancer.
Nakanishi K; Nakamura S; Sugiyama T; Kadomatsu Y; Ueno H; Goto M; Ozeki N; Fukui T; Iwano S; Chen-Yoshikawa TF
BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):983. PubMed ID: 34474680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25.
Qin C; Shao F; Hu F; Song W; Song Y; Guo J; Lan X
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1083-1093. PubMed ID: 31807883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prognostic significance of the harmonized maximum standardized uptake value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with resectable oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter study.
Kaida H; Kitajima K; Sekine T; Ito K; Daisaki H; Kimura T; Sato MP; Enomoto A; Otsuki N; Ishii K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Oct; 52(7):20230083. PubMed ID: 37494001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment
Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prognostic significance of pretreatment
Sung AJ; Weiss BD; Sharp SE; Zhang B; Trout AT
Pediatr Radiol; 2021 Jul; 51(8):1400-1405. PubMed ID: 33629142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Volumetric parameters from [
Langen Stokmo H; Aly M; Bowitz Lothe IM; Borja AJ; Mehdizadeh Seraj S; Ghorpade R; Miao X; Hjortland GO; Malinen E; Sorbye H; Werner TJ; Alavi A; Revheim ME
J Neuroendocrinol; 2022 Jul; 34(7):e13170. PubMed ID: 35729738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Imaging characteristics and prognostic values of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma on
Wang W; Liu G; Hu P; Pang L; Gu T; Yu H; Luo R; Yang X; Shi H
Clin Exp Med; 2020 Nov; 20(4):557-567. PubMed ID: 32797371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. GLUT1 expression in high-risk prostate cancer: correlation with
Meziou S; Ringuette Goulet C; Hovington H; Lefebvre V; Lavallée É; Bergeron M; Brisson H; Champagne A; Neveu B; Lacombe D; Beauregard JM; Buteau FA; Riopel J; Pouliot F
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Sep; 23(3):441-448. PubMed ID: 31932660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic value of
Lee JR; Almuhaimid TM; Roh JL; Oh JS; Kim SJ; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 118(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 30132891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic and prognostic values of 2-[
Han S; Kim YI; Oh JS; Seo SY; Park MJ; Lee GD; Choi S; Kim HR; Kim YH; Kim DK; Park SI; Ryu JS
Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):1173-1183. PubMed ID: 34448035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prognostic value of FDG uptake in primary inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.
Tong AN; Han SR; Yan P; Gong H; Zhao H; Yao H; Wang YM
Med Oncol; 2014 Jan; 31(1):780. PubMed ID: 24326983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical and prognostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in restaging of pancreatic cancer.
Albano D; Familiari D; Gentile R; Scalisi S; Midiri F; Messina M; Spada M; Fornito MC; Galia M; Midiri M; Alongi P
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Aug; 39(8):741-746. PubMed ID: 29782393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic value of SUVmax measured by pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with primary gastric lymphoma.
Hwang JP; Lim I; Byun BH; Kim BI; Choi CW; Lim SM
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1267-1272. PubMed ID: 27482643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Volumetric parameters on
Liu G; Hu Y; Cheng X; Wang Y; Gu Y; Liu T; Shi H
BMC Cancer; 2019 Aug; 19(1):790. PubMed ID: 31395059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The prognostic value of SUV
Diao W; Tian F; Jia Z
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Aug; 105():1-7. PubMed ID: 30017264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Recurrent bladder carcinoma: clinical and prognostic role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT.
Alongi P; Caobelli F; Gentile R; Stefano A; Russo G; Albano D; Baldari S; Gilardi MC; Midiri M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Feb; 44(2):224-233. PubMed ID: 27565154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. New insight on the correlation of metabolic status on
Wang Y; Zhao N; Wu Z; Pan N; Shen X; Liu T; Wei F; You J; Xu W; Ren X
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1127-1136. PubMed ID: 31502013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
