124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37190282)
1. Delay of Aortic Arterial Input Function Time Improves Detection of Malignant Vertebral Body Lesions on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Perfusion.
Camelo F; Peck KK; Saha A; Arevalo-Perez J; Lyo JK; Tisnado J; Lis E; Karimi S; Holodny AI
Cancers (Basel); 2023 Apr; 15(8):. PubMed ID: 37190282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. T1-weighted Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI to Differentiate Nonneoplastic and Malignant Vertebral Body Lesions in the Spine.
Guan Y; Peck KK; Lyo J; Tisnado J; Lis E; Arevalo-Perez J; Yamada Y; Hameed MR; Karimi S; Holodny A
Radiology; 2020 Nov; 297(2):382-389. PubMed ID: 32870135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.
Mazaheri Y; Kim N; Lakhman Y; Jafari R; Vargas A; Otazo R
NMR Biomed; 2022 Jul; 35(7):e4718. PubMed ID: 35226774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of arterial input function selection on kinetic parameters in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Keil VC; Mädler B; Gieseke J; Fimmers R; Hattingen E; Schild HH; Hadizadeh DR
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 40():83-90. PubMed ID: 28438713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function.
Liu YJ; Yang HT; Yao MM; Lin SC; Cho DY; Shen WC; Juan CJ; Chan WP
Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):2920. PubMed ID: 33536471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of osseous spine metastasis before and 1 hour after high-dose image-guided radiation therapy.
Lis E; Saha A; Peck KK; Zatcky J; Zelefsky MJ; Yamada Y; Holodny AI; Bilsky MH; Karimi S
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Jan; 42(1):E9. PubMed ID: 28041318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-temporal resolution DCE-MRI improves assessment of intra- and peri-breast lesions categorized as BI-RADS 4.
Liu Y; Wang S; Qu J; Tang R; Wang C; Xiao F; Pang P; Sun Z; Xu M; Li J
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Apr; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 37076817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the Reliability of Pharmacokinetic Parameters at Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Astrocytomas: A Deep Learning Approach.
Choi KS; You SH; Han Y; Ye JC; Jeong B; Choi SH
Radiology; 2020 Oct; 297(1):178-188. PubMed ID: 32749203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Arterial input function calculation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: an in vivo validation study using co-registered contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
Mehrabian H; Chandrana C; Pang I; Chopra R; Martel AL
Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1735-47. PubMed ID: 22752523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis.
Mehrabian H; Da Rosa M; Haider MA; Martel AL
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 26297961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blind deconvolution estimation of an arterial input function for small animal DCE-MRI.
Jiřík R; Taxt T; Macíček O; Bartoš M; Kratochvíla J; Souček K; Dražanová E; Krátká L; Hampl A; Starčuk Z
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():46-56. PubMed ID: 31150814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved hepatic arterial fraction estimation using cardiac output correction of arterial input functions for liver DCE MRI.
Chouhan MD; Bainbridge A; Atkinson D; Punwani S; Mookerjee RP; Lythgoe MF; Taylor SA
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(4):1533-1546. PubMed ID: 28002045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Different Measurement Methods of Arterial Input Function on Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters in Head and Neck Cancer.
Dong W; Volk A; Djaroum M; Girot C; Balleyguier C; Lebon V; Garcia G; Ammari S; Temam S; Gorphe P; Wei L; Pitre-Champagnat S; Lassau N; Bidault F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Jul; 58(1):122-132. PubMed ID: 36269053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement of blood perfusion in spinal metastases with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of tumor response to radiation therapy.
Chu S; Karimi S; Peck KK; Yamada Y; Lis E; Lyo J; Bilsky M; Holodny AI
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22):E1418-24. PubMed ID: 23873238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis.
Santarosa C; Castellano A; Conte GM; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Terreni MR; Franzin A; Bello L; Caulo M; Falini A; Anzalone N
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27161065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Data with a Constrained Local AIF.
Duan C; Kallehauge JF; Pérez-Torres CJ; Bretthorst GL; Beeman SC; Tanderup K; Ackerman JJH; Garbow JR
Mol Imaging Biol; 2018 Feb; 20(1):150-159. PubMed ID: 28536804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relative sensitivities of DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters to arterial input function (AIF) scaling.
Li X; Cai Y; Moloney B; Chen Y; Huang W; Woods M; Coakley FV; Rooney WD; Garzotto MG; Springer CS
J Magn Reson; 2016 Aug; 269():104-112. PubMed ID: 27288764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
