These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37190282)

  • 21. Optimization of two-compartment-exchange-model analysis for dynamic contrast-enhanced mri incorporating bolus arrival time.
    Nadav G; Liberman G; Artzi M; Kiryati N; Bashat DB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):237-249. PubMed ID: 27383624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Differentiating Atypical Hemangiomas and Metastatic Vertebral Lesions: The Role of T1-Weighted Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.
    Morales KA; Arevalo-Perez J; Peck KK; Holodny AI; Lis E; Karimi S
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 May; 39(5):968-973. PubMed ID: 29650780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Phase-based arterial input function measurements in the femoral arteries for quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and comparison with DCE-CT.
    Korporaal JG; van den Berg CA; van Osch MJ; Groenendaal G; van Vulpen M; van der Heide UA
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Nov; 66(5):1267-74. PubMed ID: 21604291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantitative analysis of acute benign and malignant vertebral body fractures using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Geith T; Biffar A; Schmidt G; Sourbron S; Dürr HR; Reiser M; Baur-Melnyk A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):W635-43. PubMed ID: 23701095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimating the arterial input function from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data with compensation for flow enhancement (II): Applications in spine diagnostics and assessment of crohn's disease.
    van Schie JJN; Lavini C; van Vliet LJ; Kramer G; Pieters-van den Bos I; Marcus JT; Stoker J; Vos FM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1197-1204. PubMed ID: 29193469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the patellar bone: How to quantify perfusion.
    Poot DHJ; van der Heijden RA; van Middelkoop M; Oei EHG; Klein S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Mar; 47(3):848-858. PubMed ID: 28707311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Average arterial input function for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of neck nodal metastases.
    Shukla-Dave A; Lee N; Stambuk H; Wang Y; Huang W; Thaler HT; Patel SG; Shah JP; Koutcher JA
    BMC Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 9():4. PubMed ID: 19351382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of arterial input function (AIF) on quantitative prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and zonal prostate anatomy.
    Ziayee F; Müller-Lutz A; Gross J; Quentin M; Ullrich T; Heusch P; Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Wittsack HJ; Schimmöller L
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 53():28-33. PubMed ID: 29902565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Subcompartmentalization of extracellular extravascular space (EES) into permeability and leaky space with local arterial input function (AIF) results in improved discrimination between high- and low-grade glioma using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.
    Sahoo P; Rathore RK; Awasthi R; Roy B; Verma S; Rathore D; Behari S; Husain M; Husain N; Pandey CM; Mohakud S; Gupta RK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 23390002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differentiation between glioblastoma and primary CNS lymphoma: application of DCE-MRI parameters based on arterial input function obtained from DSC-MRI.
    Kang KM; Choi SH; Chul-Kee P; Kim TM; Park SH; Lee JH; Lee ST; Hwang I; Yoo RE; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9098-9109. PubMed ID: 34003350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion quantification in hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine.
    Stocker D; Hectors S; Bane O; Vietti-Violi N; Said D; Kennedy P; Cuevas J; Cunha GM; Sirlin CB; Fowler KJ; Lewis S; Taouli B
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9306-9315. PubMed ID: 34043055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration?
    Wake N; Chandarana H; Rusinek H; Fujimoto K; Moy L; Sodickson DK; Kim SG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():16-23. PubMed ID: 29777820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Semi-parametric arterial input functions for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in mice.
    Taxt T; Reed RK; Pavlin T; Rygh CB; Andersen E; Jiřík R
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():10-20. PubMed ID: 29066294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A simulation study comparing nine mathematical models of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI to the Parker model.
    He D; Xu L; Qian W; Clarke J; Fan X
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Jun; 41(2):507-518. PubMed ID: 29569210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Operator dependency of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Kleppestø M; Bjørnerud A; Groote IR; Kim M; Vardal J; Larsson C
    MAGMA; 2022 Feb; 35(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 34213687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of Indicator Dilution Principle to Evaluate Accuracy of Arterial Input Function Measured With Low-Dose Ultrafast Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.
    Wang S; Fan X; Zhang Y; Medved M; He D; Yousuf A; Jamison E; Oto A; Karczmar GS
    Tomography; 2019 Jun; 5(2):260-265. PubMed ID: 31245547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA.
    Spanakis M; Kontopodis E; Van Cauter S; Sakkalis V; Marias K
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Oct; 43(5):529-47. PubMed ID: 27647272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Voxelwise comparison of perfusion parameters estimated using dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) computed tomography and DCE-magnetic resonance imaging in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Kallehauge J; Nielsen T; Haack S; Peters DA; Mohamed S; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Hansen DC; Rasmussen F; Tanderup K; Pedersen EM
    Acta Oncol; 2013 Oct; 52(7):1360-8. PubMed ID: 24003852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating the Relationship Between Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) Parameters and Pathological Characteristics in Breast Cancer.
    Kang SR; Kim HW; Kim HS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Nov; 52(5):1360-1373. PubMed ID: 32524658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of Glioblastomas and Brain Metastases using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI.
    Jung BC; Arevalo-Perez J; Lyo JK; Holodny AI; Karimi S; Young RJ; Peck KK
    J Neuroimaging; 2016; 26(2):240-6. PubMed ID: 26235208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.