These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37191814)

  • 1. Self-generated strategies in the phonological similarity effect.
    AuBuchon AM; Wagner RL
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Oct; 51(7):1683-1701. PubMed ID: 37191814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phonological similarity effects in simple and complex span tasks.
    Macnamara BN; Moore AB; Conway AR
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1174-86. PubMed ID: 21503805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
    Coltheart V; Langdon R
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Verbal working memory encodes phonological and semantic information differently.
    Kowialiewski B; Krasnoff J; Mizrak E; Oberauer K
    Cognition; 2023 Apr; 233():105364. PubMed ID: 36584522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancement of 4-year-old children's memory span for phonologically similar and dissimilar word lists.
    Cowan N; Saults JS; Winterowd C; Sherk M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1991 Feb; 51(1):30-52. PubMed ID: 2010726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists.
    Coltheart V
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 8350745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Opposing effects of phonological similarity on item and order memory of words and nonwords in the serial recall task.
    Lian A; Karlsen PJ; Eriksen TB
    Memory; 2004 May; 12(3):314-37. PubMed ID: 15279435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive choice between articulatory rehearsal and attentional refreshing in verbal working memory.
    Camos V; Mora G; Oberauer K
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 21264630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the phonological similarity effect in working memory due to proactive interference?
    Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Quinlan PT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1312-1316. PubMed ID: 29648863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phonological similarity in working memory.
    Copeland DE; Radvansky GA
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Jul; 29(5):774-6. PubMed ID: 11531232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphological processing with deficient phonological short-term memory.
    Kavé G; Ze'ev HB; Lev A
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 Jul; 24(5):516-34. PubMed ID: 18416505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The phonological similarity effect in short-term memory serial recall in schizophrenia.
    Elvevåg B; Weinberger DR; Goldberg TE
    Psychiatry Res; 2002 Sep; 112(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 12379453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phonological similarity in the serial recall task hinders item recall, not just order.
    Roodenrys S; Guitard D; Miller LM; Saint-Aubin J; Barron JM
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Nov; 113(4):1100-1120. PubMed ID: 35692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phonological information in immediate and delayed sentence recall.
    Rummer R; Engelkamp J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jan; 56(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 12587896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phonological similarity effect in complex span task.
    Camos V; Mora G; Barrouillet P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(10):1927-50. PubMed ID: 23419012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The phonological similarity effect in immediate recall: positions of shared phonemes.
    Li X; Schweickert R; Gandour J
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1116-25. PubMed ID: 11126935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multiple case study of verbal short-term memory in velo-cardio-facial syndrome.
    Majerus S; Glaser B; Van der Linden M; Eliez S
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2006 Jun; 50(Pt 6):457-69. PubMed ID: 16672039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lexicality and phonological similarity: a challenge for the retrieval-based account of serial recall?
    Fallon AB; Mak E; Tehan G; Daly C
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):349-56. PubMed ID: 15948620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate serial recall, word frequency, item identity and item position.
    Poirier M; Saint-Aubin J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1996 Dec; 50(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 9025332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.