176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37191852)
21. Cost Effectiveness of Adding Pembrolizumab to Platinum and Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A US Healthcare Payer's Perspective.
Qu T; Zhang S; Zhong Y; Meng Y; Guo H; Joo S; Enzinger PC
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Dec; 40(12):1247-1259. PubMed ID: 36241842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo as Adjuvant Therapy in Resected Stage IIB or IIC Melanoma: Final Analysis of Distant Metastasis-Free Survival in the Phase III KEYNOTE-716 Study.
Luke JJ; Ascierto PA; Khattak MA; de la Cruz Merino L; Del Vecchio M; Rutkowski P; Spagnolo F; Mackiewicz J; Chiarion-Sileni V; Kirkwood JM; Robert C; Grob JJ; de Galitiis F; Schadendorf D; Carlino MS; Wu XL; Fukunaga-Kalabis M; Krepler C; Eggermont AMM; Long GV
J Clin Oncol; 2024 May; 42(14):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 38452313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Venetoclax in Combination with Azacitidine Versus Azacitidine Monotherapy in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: From a US Third Party Payer Perspective.
Pratz KW; Chai X; Xie J; Yin L; Nie X; Montez M; Iantuono E; Downs L; Ma E
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Aug; 40(8):777-790. PubMed ID: 35696071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.
Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P
Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for the first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the United States.
Borse RH; Ramakrishnan K; Gandhi J; Dhankhar P; Chirovsky D
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):954-965. PubMed ID: 35765888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H) advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer from the perspective of the Chinese health-care system.
Zhu C; Han G; Wu B
BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Oct; 23(1):1083. PubMed ID: 37821934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma: Outcomes in histopathologic subgroups from the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 trial.
Schadendorf D; Luke JJ; Ascierto PA; Long GV; Rutkowski P; Khattak A; Del Vecchio M; de la Cruz-Merino L; Mackiewicz J; Sileni VC; Kirkwood JM; Robert C; Grob JJ; Dummer R; Carlino MS; Zhao Y; Kalabis M; Krepler C; Eggermont A; Scolyer RA
J Immunother Cancer; 2024 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 38485189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cost-Effectiveness of Cemiplimab Versus Standard of Care in the United States for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression ≥50.
Kuznik A; Smare C; Chen CI; Venkatachalam M; Keeping S; Atsou K; Xu Y; Wilson F; Guyot P; Chan K; Glowienka E; Konidaris G
Value Health; 2022 Feb; 25(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 35094793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer in China.
Zheng Z; Song X; Qiu G; Xu S; Cai H
Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 Mar; 39(3):433-440. PubMed ID: 36757780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Versus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma After First-Line Treatment in China.
Tang WX; Shao RJ; Wang J; Scherrer E; Ma AX; Aguiar-Ibáñez R
Value Health Reg Issues; 2022; 27():99-107. PubMed ID: 34922053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.
Liu Q; Tan C; Yi L; Wan X; Peng L; Li J; Luo X; Zeng X
PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0258605. PubMed ID: 34780478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost-effectiveness of ipilimumab versus high-dose interferon as an adjuvant therapy in resected high-risk melanoma.
Salans M; Courtney PT; Yip A; Murphy JD
Cancer Med; 2021 Oct; 10(19):6618-6626. PubMed ID: 34402192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cost-Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Patients with High-Risk, Early-Stage, Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Switzerland.
Favre-Bulle A; Huang M; Haiderali A; Bhadhuri A
Pharmacoecon Open; 2024 Jan; 8(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 37999854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab as adjuvant treatment of patients with stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, PD-L1+≥50% of tumor cells in France: A modeling study.
Plessala I; Cawston H; Cortes J; Ajjouri R; Le Lay K; Souquet PJ; Chouaid C
Lung Cancer; 2023 Oct; 184():107316. PubMed ID: 37562344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cost-Utility Analysis of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Different PD-L1 Expression Levels.
Weng X; Luo S; Lin S; Zhong L; Li M; Xin R; Huang P; Xu X
Oncol Res; 2020 Mar; 28(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 31610828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected high-risk stage II melanoma: Health-related quality of life from the randomized phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 study.
Khattak MA; Luke JJ; Long GV; Ascierto PA; Rutkowski P; Schadendorf D; Robert C; Grob JJ; de la Cruz Merino L; Del Vecchio M; Spagnolo F; Mackiewicz J; Chiarion-Sileni V; Carlino MS; Mohr P; De Galitiis F; Ross MI; Eroglu Z; Chen K; Jiang R; Fukunaga-Kalabis M; Krepler C; Eggermont AMM; Kirkwood JM
Eur J Cancer; 2022 Nov; 176():207-217. PubMed ID: 36202690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy for first-line treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.
Berling M; Chaudhary MA; Yuan Y; Varol N; Dale P; Testa E; Klint J; Lee A; Lubinga SJ; Penrod JR
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):703-711. PubMed ID: 35659172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Indirect Treatment Comparison of Nivolumab Versus Observation or Ipilimumab as Adjuvant Therapy in Resected Melanoma Using Pooled Clinical Trial Data.
Freeman M; Betts KA; Jiang S; Du EX; Gupte-Singh K; Lu Y; Rao S; Shoushtari AN
Adv Ther; 2019 Oct; 36(10):2783-2796. PubMed ID: 31440980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Economic evaluation of sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs. pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for the treatment of first-line advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC.
Chen P; Wang X; Zhu S; Li H; Rui M; Wang Y; Sun H; Ma A
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():956792. PubMed ID: 36016894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as a Second-Line Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Chiang CL; Chan SK; Lee SF; Wong IO; Choi HC
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jan; 4(1):e2033761. PubMed ID: 33464318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
