These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37192922)

  • 1. Age, but not an immune challenge, triggers terminal investment in the Pacific field cricket,
    Rutkowski NJ; Foo YZ; Jones TM; McNamara KB
    Behav Ecol; 2023; 34(3):468-479. PubMed ID: 37192922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age-dependent variation in the terminal investment threshold in male crickets.
    Duffield KR; Hampton KJ; Houslay TM; Hunt J; Rapkin J; Sakaluk SK; Sadd BM
    Evolution; 2018 Mar; 72(3):578-589. PubMed ID: 29392709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of maternal and paternal immune challenge on offspring immunity and reproduction in a cricket.
    McNamara KB; van Lieshout E; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Jun; 27(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 24750259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of immune challenges on the mean and variance in reproductive investment: a meta-analysis of the terminal investment hypothesis.
    Foo YZ; Lagisz M; O'Dea RE; Nakagawa S
    BMC Biol; 2023 May; 21(1):107. PubMed ID: 37173684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ejaculate economics: testing the effects of male sexual history on the trade-off between sperm and immune function in Australian crickets.
    Dowling DK; Simmons LW
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30172. PubMed ID: 22253916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dynamic threshold model for terminal investment.
    Duffield KR; Bowers EK; Sakaluk SK; Sadd BM
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2017 Dec; 71(12):. PubMed ID: 30002566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential allocation in a gift-giving spider: males adjust their reproductive investment in response to female condition.
    Solano-Brenes D; Costa-Schmidt LE; Albo MJ; Machado G
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):140. PubMed ID: 34238218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex-specific associations between life-history traits and a novel reproductive polymorphism in the Pacific field cricket.
    Richardson J; Heinen-Kay JL; Zuk M
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Mar; 34(3):549-557. PubMed ID: 33484624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic experience shapes alternative mating tactics and reproductive investment in male field crickets.
    Bailey NW; Gray B; Zuk M
    Curr Biol; 2010 May; 20(9):845-9. PubMed ID: 20417103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inbreeding alters context-dependent reproductive effort and immunity in male crickets.
    Duffield KR; Hampton KJ; Houslay TM; Hunt J; Sadd BM; Sakaluk SK
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jul; 32(7):731-741. PubMed ID: 30985046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Food Limitation but Not Enhanced Rates of Ejaculate Production Imposes Reproductive and Survival Costs to Male Crickets.
    McMahon S; Matzke M; Tuni C
    Cells; 2021 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 34203610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct and indirect effects of sexual signal loss on female reproduction in the Pacific field cricket (Teleogryllus oceanicus).
    Heinen-Kay JL; Strub DB; Balenger SL; Zuk M
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Dec; 32(12):1382-1390. PubMed ID: 31495021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative genetic evidence that males trade attractiveness for ejaculate quality in guppies.
    Evans JP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Oct; 277(1697):3195-201. PubMed ID: 20504807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Male alternative reproductive tactics and sperm competition: a meta-analysis.
    Dougherty LR; Skirrow MJA; Jennions MD; Simmons LW
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2022 Aug; 97(4):1365-1388. PubMed ID: 35229450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CALLING SONGS OF FIELD CRICKETS (TELEOGRYLLUS OCEANICUS) WITH AND WITHOUT PHONOTACTIC PARASITOID INFECTION.
    Zuk M; Rotenberry JT; Simmons LW
    Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):166-171. PubMed ID: 28568142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Terminal investment in the gustatory appeal of nuptial food gifts in crickets.
    Duffield KR; Hunt J; Rapkin J; Sadd BM; Sakaluk SK
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1872-81. PubMed ID: 26201649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Macronutrient intake and simulated infection threat independently affect life history traits of male decorated crickets.
    Duffield KR; Hampton KJ; Houslay TM; Rapkin J; Hunt J; Sadd BM; Sakaluk SK
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Oct; 10(20):11766-11778. PubMed ID: 33144999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Allocation of maternal- and ejaculate-derived proteins to reproduction in female crickets, Teleogryllus oceanicus.
    Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 21044201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immunity for nothing and the eggs for free: Apparent lack of both physiological trade-offs and terminal reproductive investment in female crickets (Gryllus texensis).
    Miyashita A; Lee TYM; McMillan LE; Easy R; Adamo SA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0209957. PubMed ID: 31091239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recovery and immune priming modulate the evolutionary trajectory of infection-induced reproductive strategies.
    Luu H; Tate AT
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Sep; 30(9):1748-1762. PubMed ID: 28667661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.