140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37193618)
1. Artificial intelligence assisted whole organ pancreatic fat estimation on magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with pancreas attenuation on computed tomography.
Janssens LP; Takahashi H; Nagayama H; Nugen F; Bamlet WR; Oberg AL; Fuemmeler E; Goenka AH; Erickson BJ; Takahashi N; Majumder S
Pancreatology; 2023 Aug; 23(5):556-562. PubMed ID: 37193618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of fatty pancreas by proton density fat fraction using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and its association with pancreatic cancer.
Fukui H; Hori M; Fukuda Y; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Ota T; Ogawa K; Ninomiya K; Tatsumi M; Osuga K; Yamada D; Eguchi H; Miyoshi E; Tomiyama N
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():25-31. PubMed ID: 31439250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated whole-volume measurement of CT fat fraction of the pancreas: correlation with Dixon MR imaging.
Tanabe M; Higashi M; Tanabe M; Kawano Y; Inoue A; Narikiyo K; Kobayashi T; Ueda T; Ito K
Br J Radiol; 2023 Jun; 96(1146):20220937. PubMed ID: 37017644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining age and sex-specific distribution of pancreatic whole-gland CT attenuation using artificial intelligence aided image segmentation: Associations with body composition and pancreatic cancer risk.
Janssens LP; Weston AD; Singh D; Spears G; Harmsen WS; Takahashi N; Philbrick KA; Erickson BJ; Abu Dayyeh BK; Chari ST; Chandrasekhara V; Gleeson FC; Levy MJ; Pearson RK; Petersen BT; Vege SS; Majumder S
Pancreatology; 2021 Dec; 21(8):1524-1530. PubMed ID: 34507900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional analysis of pancreatic fat by fat-water magnetic resonance imaging provides detailed characterization of pancreatic steatosis with improved reproducibility.
Kato S; Iwasaki A; Kurita Y; Arimoto J; Yamamoto T; Hasegawa S; Sato T; Imajo K; Hosono K; Kobayashi N; Yoneda M; Higurashi T; Kubota K; Utsunomiya D; Nakajima A
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0224921. PubMed ID: 31790429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of Liver Fat Content With Unenhanced MDCT: Phantom and Clinical Correlation With MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction.
Pickhardt PJ; Graffy PM; Reeder SB; Hernando D; Li K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):W151-W157. PubMed ID: 30016142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying steatosis in the liver and pancreas with MRI in patient with chronic liver disease.
Vieira J; Amorim J; Martí-Bonmatí L; Alberich-Bayarri Á; França M
Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2020; 62(3):222-228. PubMed ID: 31932016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pancreas fat quantification with quantitative CT: an MRI correlation analysis.
Yao WJ; Guo Z; Wang L; Li K; Saba L; Guglielmi G; Cheng XG; Brown JK; Blake GM; Liu B
Clin Radiol; 2020 May; 75(5):397.e1-397.e6. PubMed ID: 31992455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of liver, pancreas, kidney, and vertebral body MRI-PDFF in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Idilman IS; Tuzun A; Savas B; Elhan AH; Celik A; Idilman R; Karcaaltincaba M
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Aug; 40(6):1512-9. PubMed ID: 25715922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative Evaluation of Pancreatic Fibrosis and Lipomatosis: Correlation of Magnetic Resonance Findings With Histology Using Magnetization Transfer Imaging and Multigradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Schawkat K; Eshmuminov D; Lenggenhager D; Endhardt K; Vrugt B; Boss A; Petrowsky H; Clavien PA; Reiner CS
Invest Radiol; 2018 Dec; 53(12):720-727. PubMed ID: 30247172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Liver Steatosis Categorization on Contrast-Enhanced CT Using a Fully Automated Deep Learning Volumetric Segmentation Tool: Evaluation in 1204 Healthy Adults Using Unenhanced CT as a Reference Standard.
Pickhardt PJ; Blake GM; Graffy PM; Sandfort V; Elton DC; Perez AA; Summers RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):359-367. PubMed ID: 32936018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) obtained from a vendor-neutral MRI sequence and MRQuantif software.
Orcel T; Chau HT; Turlin B; Chaigneau J; Bannier E; Otal P; Frampas E; Leguen A; Boulic A; Saint-Jalmes H; Aubé C; Boursier J; Bardou-Jacquet E; Gandon Y
Eur Radiol; 2023 Dec; 33(12):8999-9009. PubMed ID: 37402003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative MRI Assessment of Pancreatic Steatosis Using Proton Density Fat Fraction in Pediatric Obesity.
Kim J; Albakheet SS; Han K; Yoon H; Lee MJ; Koh H; Kim S; Suh J; Han SJ; Ihn K; Shin HJ
Korean J Radiol; 2021 Nov; 22(11):1886-1893. PubMed ID: 34269534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Quantification of Liver, Pancreas, Spleen, Vertebral Bone Marrow, and Renal Cortex R2* and Proton Density Fat Fraction in Transfusion-Related Iron Overload.
İdilman İS; Gümrük F; Haliloğlu M; Karçaaltıncaba M
Turk J Haematol; 2016 Mar; 33(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 26376710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pilot study on longitudinal change in pancreatic proton density fat fraction during a weight-loss surgery program in adults with obesity.
Covarrubias Y; Fowler KJ; Mamidipalli A; Hamilton G; Wolfson T; Leinhard OD; Jacobsen G; Horgan S; Schwimmer JB; Reeder SB; Sirlin CB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 50(4):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 30701611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between incidental fat deposition in the liver and pancreas in asymptomatic individuals.
Aliyari Ghasabeh M; Shaghaghi M; Khoshpouri P; Pan L; Pandy A; Pandy P; Zhong X; Kannengiesser S; Kamel IR
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jan; 45(1):203-210. PubMed ID: 31482380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The spectrum of magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and two different histopathologic methods (artificial intelligence
Kim JW; Lee CH; Yang Z; Kim BH; Lee YS; Kim KA
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 Nov; 12(11):5251-5262. PubMed ID: 36330193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multisite multivendor validation of a quantitative MRI and CT compatible fat phantom.
Zhao R; Hernando D; Harris DT; Hinshaw LA; Li K; Ananthakrishnan L; Bashir MR; Duan X; Ghasabeh MA; Kamel IR; Lowry C; Mahesh M; Marin D; Miller J; Pickhardt PJ; Shaffer J; Yokoo T; Brittain JH; Reeder SB
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4375-4386. PubMed ID: 34105167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Techniques for Fat Quantification in Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Proton Density Fat Fraction and Single-Energy Computed Tomography in an Anthropomorphic Phantom Environment.
Wu ZJ; Hippe DS; Zamora DA; Briller N; Amin KA; Kolokythas O; Mileto A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):877-887. PubMed ID: 34469903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of a DIXON-based fat quantification technique for the measurement of visceral fat using a CT-based reference standard.
Heckman KM; Otemuyiwa B; Chenevert TL; Malyarenko D; Derstine BA; Wang SC; Davenport MS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jan; 44(1):346-354. PubMed ID: 29946923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
