149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37193776)
21. Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for cancer by prostate specific antigen: prospective evaluation within ProtecT study.
Rosario DJ; Lane JA; Metcalfe C; Donovan JL; Doble A; Goodwin L; Davis M; Catto JW; Avery K; Neal DE; Hamdy FC
BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7894. PubMed ID: 22232535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An Evaluation of Screening Pathways Using a Combination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-specific Antigen: Results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM Study.
Eldred-Evans D; Tam H; Sokhi H; Padhani AR; Connor M; Price D; Gammon M; Klimowska-Nassar N; Burak P; Day E; Winkler M; Fiorentino F; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Jun; 6(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 37080821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Tailoring Intensity of Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Based on Individualized Prediction of Risk Stability.
Cooperberg MR; Zheng Y; Faino AV; Newcomb LF; Zhu K; Cowan JE; Brooks JD; Dash A; Gleave ME; Martin F; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Carroll PR; Lin DW
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Oct; 6(10):e203187. PubMed ID: 32852532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Positive predictive value of prostate biopsy indicated by prostate-specific-antigen-based prostate cancer screening: trends over time in a European randomized trial*.
Bokhorst LP; Zhu X; Bul M; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1654-60. PubMed ID: 23043563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Preliminary Study of the Ability of the 4Kscore test, the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial-Risk Calculator and the European Research Screening Prostate-Risk Calculator for Predicting High-Grade Prostate Cancer.
Borque-Fernando Á; Esteban-Escaño LM; Rubio-Briones J; Lou-Mercadé AC; García-Ruiz R; Tejero-Sánchez A; Muñoz-Rivero MV; Cabañuz-Plo T; Alfaro-Torres J; Marquina-Ibáñez IM; Hakim-Alonso S; Mejía-Urbáez E; Gil-Fabra J; Gil-Martínez P; Ávarez-Alegret R; Sanz G; Gil-Sanz MJ
Actas Urol Esp; 2016 Apr; 40(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 26598800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration is positively associated with rate of disease reclassification on subsequent active surveillance prostate biopsy in men with low PSA density.
Umbehr MH; Platz EA; Peskoe SB; Bhavsar NA; Epstein JI; Landis P; Partin AW; Carter HB
BJU Int; 2014 Apr; 113(4):561-7. PubMed ID: 23746233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prostate MRI versus PSA screening for prostate cancer detection (the MVP Study): a randomised clinical trial.
Nam R; Patel C; Milot L; Hird A; Wallis C; Macinnis P; Singh M; Emmenegger U; Sherman C; Haider MA
BMJ Open; 2022 Nov; 12(11):e059482. PubMed ID: 36351725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Risk stratification in men with a negative prostate biopsy: an interim analysis of a prospective cohort study.
Sandahl M; Pedersen BG; Ulhøi BP; Borre M; Sørensen KD
BJU Int; 2021 Dec; 128(6):702-712. PubMed ID: 33964113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Transrectal Ultrasonography Biopsy for Biopsy-Naive Men at Risk for Prostate Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Klotz L; Chin J; Black PC; Finelli A; Anidjar M; Bladou F; Mercado A; Levental M; Ghai S; Chang SD; Milot L; Patel C; Kassam Z; Moore C; Kasivisvanathan V; Loblaw A; Kebabdjian M; Earle CC; Pond GR; Haider MA
JAMA Oncol; 2021 Apr; 7(4):534-542. PubMed ID: 33538782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.
Kupelian PA; Katcher J; Levin HS; Klein EA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 9169811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Risk of repeat biopsy and prostate cancer detection after an initial extended negative biopsy: longitudinal follow-up from a prospective trial.
Ploussard G; Nicolaiew N; Marchand C; Terry S; Allory Y; Vacherot F; Abbou CC; Salomon L; de la Taille A
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):988-96. PubMed ID: 23452046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Statin use and risk of prostate cancer and high-grade prostate cancer: results from the REDUCE study.
Freedland SJ; Hamilton RJ; Gerber L; Banez LL; Moreira DM; Andriole GL; Rittmaster RS
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2013 Sep; 16(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 23567655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A Prospective Multicenter Comparison Study of Risk-adapted Ultrasound-directed and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Diagnostic Pathways for Suspected Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Wagensveld IM; Osses DF; Groenendijk PM; Zijta FM; Busstra MB; Rociu E; Barentsz JO; Michiel Sedelaar JP; Arbeel B; Roeleveld T; Geenen R; Koeter I; van der Meer SA; Cappendijk V; Somford R; Klaver S; Van der Lely H; Wolters T; Hellings W; Leter MR; Van der Poel HG; Heijmink SWTPJ; Debruyne F; Immerzeel J; Leijte J; van Roermund J; Miclea R; Planken E; Vis AN; Jan de Jong I; Tijsterman J; Wolterbeek D; Claessen A; Vrijhof E; Nederend J; Van Leenders GJLH; Bangma CH; Krestin GP; Remmers S; Schoots IG;
Eur Urol; 2022 Sep; 82(3):318-326. PubMed ID: 35341658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic Pathway with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Standard Pathway: Results from a Randomized Prospective Study in Biopsy-naïve Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer.
Porpiglia F; Manfredi M; Mele F; Cossu M; Bollito E; Veltri A; Cirillo S; Regge D; Faletti R; Passera R; Fiori C; De Luca S
Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):282-288. PubMed ID: 27574821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients.
Caster JM; Falchook AD; Hendrix LH; Chen RC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 25841621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Low AUA symptom score independently predicts positive prostate needle biopsy: results from a racially diverse series of 411 patients.
Porter CR; Kim J
Urology; 2004 Jan; 63(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 14751356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Simple Risk Stratification to Detect Prostate Cancer with High Gleason Score in Repeat Biopsies in a Population Screening Follow-up Study.
Kitagawa Y; Urata S; Mizokami A; Nakashima K; Koshida K; Nakashima T; Miyazaki K; Namiki M
Anticancer Res; 2015 Sep; 35(9):5031-6. PubMed ID: 26254404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
