158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37194016)
1. Evaluation and comparison of ocular biometric parameters obtained with Tomey OA-2000 in silicone oil-filled aphakic eyes.
Xiong Y; Lin Y; Zhao Z; Wang H; Zhang G
BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 23(1):218. PubMed ID: 37194016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes.
Hua Y; Qiu W; Xiao Q; Wu Q
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0193023. PubMed ID: 29486009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer.
Rohrer K; Frueh BE; Wälti R; Clemetson IA; Tappeiner C; Goldblum D
Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2087-92. PubMed ID: 19744720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices.
Oh R; Oh JY; Choi HJ; Kim MK; Yoon CH
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 33504333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and agreement with other three optical biometers.
Cheng SM; Zhang JS; Shao X; Wu ZT; Li TT; Wang P; Lin JH; Yu AY
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Jul; 260(7):2271-2281. PubMed ID: 35171331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of IOLMaster 500 and IOLMaster 700 in the measurement of ocular biometric parameters in cataract patients.
Jiang J; Pan X; Zhou M; Wang X; Zhu H; Li D
Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):12770. PubMed ID: 35896713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients.
Ghaffari R; Mahmoudzadeh R; Mohammadi SS; Salabati M; Latifi G; Ghassemi H
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):745-750. PubMed ID: 31592957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a New All-in-One Optical Biometer and Comparison With a Validated Swept-source OCT Biometer.
Li Y; Zou Z; Xu S; Yu J; Ye Q; Li K; Xiao Y; Savini G; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Zhou X; Yao M; Huang J
J Refract Surg; 2023 Dec; 39(12):825-830. PubMed ID: 38063829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements.
Sel S; Stange J; Kaiser D; Kiraly L
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):318-322. PubMed ID: 28342729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement between Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometers and a Partial Coherence Interferometer.
Moon JY; Cho SC; Kim HJ; Jun RM; Han KE
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 36(4):326-337. PubMed ID: 35766049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster.
Huang J; Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Chen H; Lu W; Hu Q; Bao F; Wang Q
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):493-498. PubMed ID: 27503393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices.
Cho YJ; Lim TH; Choi KY; Cho BJ
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 32(4):257-264. PubMed ID: 30091303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers.
Grulkowski I; Liu JJ; Zhang JY; Potsaid B; Jayaraman V; Cable AE; Duker JS; Fujimoto JG
Ophthalmology; 2013 Nov; 120(11):2184-90. PubMed ID: 23755873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of corneal refractive power and astigmatism measured by the new anterior segment optical coherence tomographic device and Scheimpflug imaging device in age-related cataract patients].
Gao YC; Jiang YF; Lin S; Tian F
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 57(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 33412642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement of Anterior Segment Parameter Measurements With CASIA 2 and IOLMaster 700.
Ruan X; Yang G; Xia Z; Zhang J; Gu X; Tan Y; Liu Z; Luo L
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():777443. PubMed ID: 35223893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry.
Gao R; Chen H; Savini G; Miao Y; Wang X; Yang J; Zhao W; Wang Q; Huang J
Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2484. PubMed ID: 28559547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeatability of ocular biometry with IOLMaster 700 in subjects with clear lens.
Garza-Leon M; Fuentes-de la Fuente HA; García-Treviño AV
Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 37(5):1133-1138. PubMed ID: 27770390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer.
Tañá-Rivero P; Aguilar-Córcoles S; Tello-Elordi C; Pastor-Pascual F; Montés-Micó R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Apr; 47(4):488-495. PubMed ID: 33252569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of the IOLMaster 700 and its agreement with the IOLMaster v3 in children.
Leighton RE; Breslin KM; Saunders KJ; McCullough SJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Jan; 42(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 34761427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comprehensive comparisons of ocular biometry: A network-based big data analysis.
Yu J; Wen D; Zhao J; Wang Y; Feng K; Wan T; Savini G; McAlinden C; Lin X; Niu L; Chen S; Gao Q; Ning R; Jin Y; Zhou X; Huang J
Eye Vis (Lond); 2022 Dec; 10(1):1. PubMed ID: 36593481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
