These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37195782)

  • 1. Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts.
    Catarci M; Guadagni S; Masedu F; Ruffo G; Viola MG; Borghi F; Baldazzi G; Scatizzi M;
    Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2312-2323. PubMed ID: 37195782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidence of anastomotic leakage using powered circular staplers versus manual circular staplers for left colorectal anastomosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Pérez-Santiago L; Barrachina-Martinez I; González-de-Julián S; Vivas-Consuelo D; Espí-Macías A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2024 Jul; 28(1):76. PubMed ID: 38954099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Mora-Oliver I; Gadea-Mateo R; Cozar-Lozano C; Espí-Macías A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Mar; 25(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 32914268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study.
    Wang T; Sadowsky M; Blakney R; Coplan P; Petraiuolo W; Soberman M; Tomaszewski J; Rene L; Wood J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Nov; 38(1):264. PubMed ID: 37932486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of a circular powered stapler on preventing anastomotic leakage in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.
    Shibutani M; Fukuoka T; Iseki Y; Kasashima H; Kitayama K; Maeda K
    BMC Surg; 2023 Jul; 23(1):205. PubMed ID: 37464350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.
    Vignali A; Gozzini L; Gasparini G; Calef R; Rosati R; Elmore U
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):211. PubMed ID: 37561203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of a new triple-row circular stapler in reducing the risk of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A historical control and propensity score-matched study.
    Mazaki J; Katsumata K; Ishizaki T; Fukushima N; Udo R; Tago T; Kasahara K; Kuwabara H; Enomoto M; Nagakawa Y; Tsuchida A
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jul; 101(27):e29325. PubMed ID: 35801763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preliminary evaluation of two-row versus three-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis after rectal resection: a single-center retrospective analysis.
    Quero G; Fiorillo C; Menghi R; Rosa F; Massimiani G; Schena CA; De Sio D; Laterza V; Lucinato C; Papa V; Tondolo V; Alfieri S
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Dec; 37(12):2501-2510. PubMed ID: 36385574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety of Small Circular Staplers in Double Stapling Technique Anastomosis for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer.
    Nagaoka T; Yamaguchi T; Nagasaki T; Akiyoshi T; Nagayama S; Fukunaga Y; Chino A; Ishizuka N; Konishi T
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Aug; 64(8):937-945. PubMed ID: 33951685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does advancement in stapling technology with triple-row and enhanced staple configurations confer additional safety? A matched comparison of 340 stapled ileocolic anastomoses.
    Foo CC; Chiu AHO; Yip J; Law WL
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jul; 32(7):3122-3130. PubMed ID: 29340808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate.
    Braunschmid T; Hartig N; Baumann L; Dauser B; Herbst F
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5318-5326. PubMed ID: 28634627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of the polyglycolic acid sheet for preventing anastomotic leakage in double-stapling technique anastomosis for left-sided colon or rectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched study.
    Shibutani M; Fukuoka T; Iseki Y; Kasashima H; Maeda K
    BMC Surg; 2023 May; 23(1):135. PubMed ID: 37198625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Real-life introduction of powered circular stapler for esophagogastric anastomosis: cohort and propensity matched score study.
    Vanstraelen S; Coosemans W; Depypere L; Mandeville Y; Moons J; Van Veer H; Nafteux P
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Apr; 36(5):. PubMed ID: 36222069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of stapling technique and surgeon specialism on anastomotic failure after right-sided colorectal resection: an international multicentre, prospective audit.
    2015 European Society of Coloproctology Collaborating Group
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1028-1040. PubMed ID: 29920945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis of the Italian colorectal anastomotic leakage (iCral) study group prospective cohorts.
    Catarci M; Guadagni S; Masedu F; Ruffo G; Viola MG; Borghi F; Baldazzi G; Pirozzi F; Delrio P; Garulli G; Marini P; Patriti A; Campagnacci R; Sica G; Caricato M; Montemurro LA; Ciano P; Benedetti M; Guercioni G; Scatizzi M;
    Updates Surg; 2024 Jan; 76(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 37851299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fact or fiction? Does the position of the end-to-end (EEA) stapler spike matter for colorectal anastomoses using a double-stapled technique?
    Cavallaro P; Lee GC; Kanters A; Valente M; Holubar SD; Champagne B; Rosen D; Gorgun E; Steele S
    Colorectal Dis; 2024 Jan; 26(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 38083875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for left-sided colorectal reconstructions: a propensity score matching-adjusted indirect comparison with manual circular staplers.
    Sylla P; Sagar P; Johnston SS; Dwarakanathan HR; Waggoner JR; Schwiers M; Roy S
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2541-2553. PubMed ID: 34031743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.