BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37195782)

  • 1. Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts.
    Catarci M; Guadagni S; Masedu F; Ruffo G; Viola MG; Borghi F; Baldazzi G; Scatizzi M;
    Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2312-2323. PubMed ID: 37195782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Mora-Oliver I; Gadea-Mateo R; Cozar-Lozano C; Espí-Macías A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Mar; 25(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 32914268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study.
    Wang T; Sadowsky M; Blakney R; Coplan P; Petraiuolo W; Soberman M; Tomaszewski J; Rene L; Wood J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Nov; 38(1):264. PubMed ID: 37932486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of a circular powered stapler on preventing anastomotic leakage in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.
    Shibutani M; Fukuoka T; Iseki Y; Kasashima H; Kitayama K; Maeda K
    BMC Surg; 2023 Jul; 23(1):205. PubMed ID: 37464350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.
    Vignali A; Gozzini L; Gasparini G; Calef R; Rosati R; Elmore U
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):211. PubMed ID: 37561203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of a new triple-row circular stapler in reducing the risk of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A historical control and propensity score-matched study.
    Mazaki J; Katsumata K; Ishizaki T; Fukushima N; Udo R; Tago T; Kasahara K; Kuwabara H; Enomoto M; Nagakawa Y; Tsuchida A
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jul; 101(27):e29325. PubMed ID: 35801763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preliminary evaluation of two-row versus three-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis after rectal resection: a single-center retrospective analysis.
    Quero G; Fiorillo C; Menghi R; Rosa F; Massimiani G; Schena CA; De Sio D; Laterza V; Lucinato C; Papa V; Tondolo V; Alfieri S
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Dec; 37(12):2501-2510. PubMed ID: 36385574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety of Small Circular Staplers in Double Stapling Technique Anastomosis for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer.
    Nagaoka T; Yamaguchi T; Nagasaki T; Akiyoshi T; Nagayama S; Fukunaga Y; Chino A; Ishizuka N; Konishi T
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Aug; 64(8):937-945. PubMed ID: 33951685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does advancement in stapling technology with triple-row and enhanced staple configurations confer additional safety? A matched comparison of 340 stapled ileocolic anastomoses.
    Foo CC; Chiu AHO; Yip J; Law WL
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jul; 32(7):3122-3130. PubMed ID: 29340808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate.
    Braunschmid T; Hartig N; Baumann L; Dauser B; Herbst F
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5318-5326. PubMed ID: 28634627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of the polyglycolic acid sheet for preventing anastomotic leakage in double-stapling technique anastomosis for left-sided colon or rectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched study.
    Shibutani M; Fukuoka T; Iseki Y; Kasashima H; Maeda K
    BMC Surg; 2023 May; 23(1):135. PubMed ID: 37198625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-life introduction of powered circular stapler for esophagogastric anastomosis: cohort and propensity matched score study.
    Vanstraelen S; Coosemans W; Depypere L; Mandeville Y; Moons J; Van Veer H; Nafteux P
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Apr; 36(5):. PubMed ID: 36222069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of stapling technique and surgeon specialism on anastomotic failure after right-sided colorectal resection: an international multicentre, prospective audit.
    2015 European Society of Coloproctology Collaborating Group
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1028-1040. PubMed ID: 29920945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis of the Italian colorectal anastomotic leakage (iCral) study group prospective cohorts.
    Catarci M; Guadagni S; Masedu F; Ruffo G; Viola MG; Borghi F; Baldazzi G; Pirozzi F; Delrio P; Garulli G; Marini P; Patriti A; Campagnacci R; Sica G; Caricato M; Montemurro LA; Ciano P; Benedetti M; Guercioni G; Scatizzi M;
    Updates Surg; 2024 Jan; 76(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 37851299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fact or fiction? Does the position of the end-to-end (EEA) stapler spike matter for colorectal anastomoses using a double-stapled technique?
    Cavallaro P; Lee GC; Kanters A; Valente M; Holubar SD; Champagne B; Rosen D; Gorgun E; Steele S
    Colorectal Dis; 2024 Jan; 26(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 38083875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for left-sided colorectal reconstructions: a propensity score matching-adjusted indirect comparison with manual circular staplers.
    Sylla P; Sagar P; Johnston SS; Dwarakanathan HR; Waggoner JR; Schwiers M; Roy S
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2541-2553. PubMed ID: 34031743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preventing complications in colorectal anastomosis: results of a randomized controlled trial using bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for circular stapler.
    Placer C; Enríquez-Navascués JM; Elorza G; Timoteo A; Mugica JA; Borda N; Saralegui Y; Elósegui JL
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Oct; 57(10):1195-201. PubMed ID: 25203376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.