These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37195782)

  • 21. Preventing complications in colorectal anastomosis: results of a randomized controlled trial using bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for circular stapler.
    Placer C; Enríquez-Navascués JM; Elorza G; Timoteo A; Mugica JA; Borda N; Saralegui Y; Elósegui JL
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Oct; 57(10):1195-201. PubMed ID: 25203376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of anastomotic techniques on postoperative anastomotic complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit.
    Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit study group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 164(3):674-684.e5. PubMed ID: 35249756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Circular stapling anastomosis with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Shishido Y; Matsunaga T; Makinoya M; Miyauchi W; Shimizu S; Miyatani K; Uejima C; Morimoto M; Murakami Y; Hanaki T; Kihara K; Yamamoto M; Tokuyasu N; Takano S; Sakamoto T; Saito H; Hasegawa T; Fujiwara Y
    BMC Surg; 2022 Apr; 22(1):152. PubMed ID: 35488244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis.
    Matsuhashi N; Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Endo M; Sato Y; Kuno M; Hayashi H; Asai R; Fukada M; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Takahashi T
    BMC Surg; 2023 Oct; 23(1):332. PubMed ID: 37898761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of circular stapler size on anastomotic stricture formation in colorectal surgery: A propensity score matched study.
    Lee KY; Lee J; Park YY; Kim HJ; Oh ST
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0287595. PubMed ID: 37903104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Should anastomotic assessment with flexible sigmoidoscopy be routine following laparoscopic restorative left colorectal resection?
    Kamal T; Pai A; Velchuru VR; Zawadzki M; Park JJ; Marecik SJ; Abcarian H; Prasad LM
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 Feb; 17(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 25359528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Novel Predictive Model for Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Cancer Using Auto-artificial Intelligence.
    Mazaki J; Katsumata K; Ohno Y; Udo R; Tago T; Kasahara K; Kuwabara H; Enomoto M; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y; Tsuchida A
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Nov; 41(11):5821-5825. PubMed ID: 34732457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
    Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
    J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of the circular compression stapler and circular mechanical stapler in the end-to-side transanal colorectal anastomosis after left colon and rectal resections A single center experience.
    Pironi D; Vendettuoli M; Pontone S; Panarese A; Arcieri S; Filippini A; Grimaldi G
    Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():23-30. PubMed ID: 27025236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis using the novel Chex(®) circular stapler: a case-control study.
    Maggiori L; Bretagnol F; Ferron M; Chevalier Y; Panis Y
    Colorectal Dis; 2011 Jun; 13(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 20184634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of the impact of EEA stapler size on risk of anastomotic complications in colorectal anastomosis: does size matter?
    Reif de Paula T; Simon H; Shah M; Lee-Kong S; Kiely JM; Kiran RP; Keller DS
    Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Apr; 24(4):283-290. PubMed ID: 32036461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Efficacy of a robotic stapler on symptomatic anastomotic leakage in robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Chen K; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Hino H; Manabe S; Yamaoka Y; Kato S; Hanaoka M; Saito K; Maeda C; Kojima T; Shioi I; Nanishi K; Tanaka Y; Kasai S
    Surg Today; 2022 Jan; 52(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 34110488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Incidence, predictors, and economic burden of circular anastomotic complications in left-sided colorectal reconstructions involving manual circular staplers.
    Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Chaudhuri R; Fryrear R; Roy S
    J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):255-265. PubMed ID: 33576292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of a circular powered stapler for creation of anastomosis in left-sided colorectal surgery: A prospective cohort study.
    Herzig DO; Ogilvie JW; Chudzinski A; Ferrara A; Ashraf SQ; Jimenez-Rodriguez RM; Van der Speeten K; Kinross J; Schimmelpenning H; Sagar PM; Cannon JA; Schwiers ML; Singleton DW; Waggoner JR; Fryrear R; Sylla P
    Int J Surg; 2020 Dec; 84():140-146. PubMed ID: 33176211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use of single-stapling techniques reduces anastomotic complications in minimal-invasive rectal surgery.
    Brunner M; Zu'bi A; Weber K; Denz A; Langheinrich M; Kersting S; Weber GF; Grützmann R; Krautz C
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Jul; 37(7):1601-1609. PubMed ID: 35704092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection with Two Planned Stapler Fires.
    Otsuka K; Kimura T; Matsuo T; Fujii H; Yaegashi M; Sato K; Kondo S; Sasaki A
    JSLS; 2019; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 30914830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Anastomosis oversewing technique to prevent leakage after oesophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Tu DH; Qu R; Ping W; Yang G; Fu X; Cai Y
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 May; 61(5):990-998. PubMed ID: 35325107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Safety of anastomoses in colorectal cancer surgery in octogenarians: a prospective cohort study with propensity score matching.
    Lehmann KS; Klinger C; Diers J; Buhr HJ; Germer CT; Wiegering A
    BJS Open; 2021 Nov; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 34791030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
    Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Anastomotic complications after laparoscopic total gastrectomy with esophagojejunostomy constructed by circular stapler (OrVil
    Kawamura H; Ohno Y; Ichikawa N; Yoshida T; Homma S; Takahashi M; Taketomi A
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5175-5182. PubMed ID: 28488177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.