125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37195839)
1. A Graph Convolution Network-Based Model for Prioritizing Personalized Cancer Driver Genes of Individual Patients.
Peng W; Yu P; Dai W; Fu X; Liu L; Pan Y
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2023 Oct; 22(4):744-754. PubMed ID: 37195839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying cancer driver genes based on multi-view heterogeneous graph convolutional network and self-attention mechanism.
Peng W; Wu R; Dai W; Yu N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 24(1):16. PubMed ID: 36639646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting cancer drug response using parallel heterogeneous graph convolutional networks with neighborhood interactions.
Peng W; Liu H; Dai W; Yu N; Wang J
Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 38(19):4546-4553. PubMed ID: 35997568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel network control model for identifying personalized driver genes in cancer.
Guo WF; Zhang SW; Zeng T; Li Y; Gao J; Chen L
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Nov; 15(11):e1007520. PubMed ID: 31765387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prioritization of cancer driver gene with prize-collecting steiner tree by introducing an edge weighted strategy in the personalized gene interaction network.
Zhang SW; Wang ZN; Li Y; Guo WF
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Aug; 23(1):341. PubMed ID: 35974311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MiRNA-gene network embedding for predicting cancer driver genes.
Peng W; Wu R; Dai W; Ning Y; Fu X; Liu L; Liu L
Brief Funct Genomics; 2023 Jul; 22(4):341-350. PubMed ID: 36752023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring gene-patient association to identify personalized cancer driver genes by linear neighborhood propagation.
Huang Y; Chen F; Sun H; Zhong C
BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Jan; 25(1):34. PubMed ID: 38254011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving drug response prediction based on two-space graph convolution.
Peng W; Chen T; Liu H; Dai W; Yu N; Lan W
Comput Biol Med; 2023 May; 158():106859. PubMed ID: 37023539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Novel Method for Identifying the Potential Cancer Driver Genes Based on Molecular Data Integration.
Zhang W; Wang SL
Biochem Genet; 2020 Feb; 58(1):16-39. PubMed ID: 31115714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel heterophilic graph diffusion convolutional network for identifying cancer driver genes.
Zhang T; Zhang SW; Xie MY; Li Y
Brief Bioinform; 2023 May; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 37055234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. driveR: a novel method for prioritizing cancer driver genes using somatic genomics data.
Ülgen E; Sezerman OU
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 22(1):263. PubMed ID: 34030627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DGMP: Identifying Cancer Driver Genes by Jointing DGCN and MLP from Multi-omics Genomic Data.
Zhang SW; Xu JY; Zhang T
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2022 Oct; 20(5):928-938. PubMed ID: 36464123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting Drug Response Based on Multi-Omics Fusion and Graph Convolution.
Peng W; Chen T; Dai W
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2022 Mar; 26(3):1384-1393. PubMed ID: 34347616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DRdriver: identifying drug resistance driver genes using individual-specific gene regulatory network.
Huang YE; Zhou S; Liu H; Zhou X; Yuan M; Hou F; Chen S; Chen J; Wang L; Jiang W
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Mar; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36869849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identifying cancer driver genes using a two-stage random walk with restart on a gene interaction network.
Meng P; Wang G; Guo H; Jiang T
Comput Biol Med; 2023 May; 158():106810. PubMed ID: 37011433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discovering potential cancer driver genes by an integrated network-based approach.
Shi K; Gao L; Wang B
Mol Biosyst; 2016 Aug; 12(9):2921-31. PubMed ID: 27426053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Integrative Method Based on the Module-Network for Identifying Driver Genes in Cancer Subtypes.
Lu X; Li X; Liu P; Qian X; Miao Q; Peng S
Molecules; 2018 Jan; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 29364829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sparse overlapping group lasso for integrative multi-omics analysis.
Park H; Niida A; Miyano S; Imoto S
J Comput Biol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 25629319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-Omic Data Improve Prediction of Personalized Tumor Suppressors and Oncogenes.
Sudhakar M; Rengaswamy R; Raman K
Front Genet; 2022; 13():854190. PubMed ID: 35620468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DEOD: uncovering dominant effects of cancer-driver genes based on a partial covariance selection method.
Amgalan B; Lee H
Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 31(15):2452-60. PubMed ID: 25819079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
