These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37197991)

  • 1. Leveraging family data to design Mendelian randomization that is provably robust to population stratification.
    LaPierre N; Fu B; Turnbull S; Eskin E; Sankararaman S
    Genome Res; 2023 Jul; 33(7):1032-1041. PubMed ID: 37197991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Leveraging family data to design Mendelian Randomization that is provably robust to population stratification.
    LaPierre N; Fu B; Turnbull S; Eskin E; Sankararaman S
    bioRxiv; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36711635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mendelian randomization for causal inference accounting for pleiotropy and sample structure using genome-wide summary statistics.
    Hu X; Zhao J; Lin Z; Wang Y; Peng H; Zhao H; Wan X; Yang C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(28):e2106858119. PubMed ID: 35787050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Weak and pleiotropy robust sex-stratified Mendelian randomization in the one sample and two sample settings.
    Karageorgiou V; Tyrrell J; Mckinley TJ; Bowden J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Mar; 47(2):135-151. PubMed ID: 36682072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.
    Minică CC; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; de Geus E; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2018 Jul; 48(4):337-349. PubMed ID: 29882082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of negative control outcomes in Mendelian randomization to detect potential population stratification.
    Sanderson E; Richardson TG; Hemani G; Davey Smith G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 50(4):1350-1361. PubMed ID: 33570130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating Family-Based and Mendelian Randomization Designs.
    Hwang LD; Davies NM; Warrington NM; Evans DM
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 32122917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical comparisons of multiple Mendelian randomization approaches in the presence of assortative mating.
    Minică CC; Boomsma DI; Dolan CV; de Geus E; Neale MC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Aug; 49(4):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 32155257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias in Mendelian randomization due to assortative mating.
    Hartwig FP; Davies NM; Davey Smith G
    Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 42(7):608-620. PubMed ID: 29971821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of two-sample methods for Mendelian randomization analyses on single large datasets.
    Minelli C; Del Greco M F; van der Plaat DA; Bowden J; Sheehan NA; Thompson J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 50(5):1651-1659. PubMed ID: 33899104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases in Mendelian randomization through within-family analyses.
    Brumpton B; Sanderson E; Heilbron K; Hartwig FP; Harrison S; Vie GÅ; Cho Y; Howe LD; Hughes A; Boomsma DI; Havdahl A; Hopper J; Neale M; Nivard MG; Pedersen NL; Reynolds CA; Tucker-Drob EM; Grotzinger A; Howe L; Morris T; Li S; ; ; Auton A; Windmeijer F; Chen WM; Bjørngaard JH; Hveem K; Willer C; Evans DM; Kaprio J; Davey Smith G; Åsvold BO; Hemani G; Davies NM
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3519. PubMed ID: 32665587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification and estimation for causal inference.
    Liu Z; Ye T; Sun B; Schooling M; Tchetgen ET
    Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2208-2219. PubMed ID: 35950778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust Mendelian randomization in the presence of residual population stratification, batch effects and horizontal pleiotropy.
    Cinelli C; LaPierre N; Hill BL; Sankararaman S; Eskin E
    Nat Commun; 2022 Mar; 13(1):1093. PubMed ID: 35232963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bias in two-sample Mendelian randomization when using heritable covariable-adjusted summary associations.
    Hartwig FP; Tilling K; Davey Smith G; Lawlor DA; Borges MC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 50(5):1639-1650. PubMed ID: 33619569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age at menarche and adult body mass index: a Mendelian randomization study.
    Gill D; Brewer CF; Del Greco M F; Sivakumaran P; Bowden J; Sheehan NA; Minelli C
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2018 Sep; 42(9):1574-1581. PubMed ID: 29549348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation.
    Carter AR; Sanderson E; Hammerton G; Richmond RC; Davey Smith G; Heron J; Taylor AE; Davies NM; Howe LD
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2021 May; 36(5):465-478. PubMed ID: 33961203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Educational attainment, health outcomes and mortality: a within-sibship Mendelian randomization study.
    Howe LJ; Rasheed H; Jones PR; Boomsma DI; Evans DM; Giannelis A; Hayward C; Hopper JL; Hughes A; Lahtinen H; Li S; Lind PA; Martin NG; Martikainen P; Medland SE; Morris TT; Nivard MG; Pingault JB; Silventoinen K; Smith JA; Willoughby EA; Wilson JF; ; Åsvold BO; Næss ØE; Davey Smith G; Kaprio J; Brumpton B; Davies NM
    Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 52(5):1579-1591. PubMed ID: 37295953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association of maternal circulating 25(OH)D and calcium with birth weight: A mendelian randomisation analysis.
    Thompson WD; Tyrrell J; Borges MC; Beaumont RN; Knight BA; Wood AR; Ring SM; Hattersley AT; Freathy RM; Lawlor DA
    PLoS Med; 2019 Jun; 16(6):e1002828. PubMed ID: 31211782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Welch-weighted Egger regression reduces false positives due to correlated pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization.
    Brown BC; Knowles DA
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Dec; 108(12):2319-2335. PubMed ID: 34861175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within family Mendelian randomization studies.
    Davies NM; Howe LJ; Brumpton B; Havdahl A; Evans DM; Davey Smith G
    Hum Mol Genet; 2019 Nov; 28(R2):R170-R179. PubMed ID: 31647093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.