These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37199055)
1. Accuracy of implant site preparation in robotic navigated dental implant surgery. Linn TY; Salamanca E; Aung LM; Huang TK; Wu YF; Chang WJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Oct; 25(5):881-891. PubMed ID: 37199055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for single-tooth implant placement: A case series. Yang S; Chen J; Li A; Deng K; Li P; Xu S J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104451. PubMed ID: 36781099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study. Wang W; Xu H; Mei D; Zhou C; Li X; Han Z; Zhou X; Li X; Zhao B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):309-316. PubMed ID: 37728030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A retrospective case series study. Li P; Chen J; Li A; Luo K; Xu S; Yang S Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 37855331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy analysis of robotic-assisted immediate implant placement: A retrospective case series. Zhao N; Du L; Lv C; Liang J; He L; Zhou Q J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105035. PubMed ID: 38734299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of haptic robotic guidance of dental implant surgery for completely edentulous arches. Bolding SL; Reebye UN J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 33678441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison the accuracy of a novel implant robot surgery and dynamic navigation system in dental implant surgery: an in vitro pilot study. Chen J; Bai X; Ding Y; Shen L; Sun X; Cao R; Yang F; Wang L BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):179. PubMed ID: 36978064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of dental implant placement with a robotic system in partially edentulous patients: A prospective, single-arm clinical trial. Chen W; Al-Taezi KA; Chu CH; Shen Y; Wu J; Cai K; Chen P; Tang C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jul; 34(7):707-718. PubMed ID: 37167364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study. Tao B; Feng Y; Fan X; Zhuang M; Chen X; Wang F; Wu Y J Dent; 2022 Aug; 123():104170. PubMed ID: 35679989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of implant shape and length on the accuracy of robot-assisted immediate implant surgery: An in vitro study. Wang Y; Yu S; Wang Y; Feng Y; Yan Q; Zhang Y Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Mar; 35(3):350-357. PubMed ID: 38174662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of immediate anterior implantation using static and robotic computer-assisted implant surgery: A retrospective study. Li J; Dai M; Wang S; Zhang X; Fan Q; Chen L J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105218. PubMed ID: 38955260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accuracy of a novel image-guided hybrid robotic system for dental implant placement: An in vitro study. Tao B; Feng Y; Fan X; Lan K; Zhuang M; Wang S; Wang F; Chen X; Wu Y Int J Med Robot; 2023 Feb; 19(1):e2452. PubMed ID: 35946497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique. Tan PLB; Layton DM; Wise SL Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An in-vitro study. Cheng KJ; Kan TS; Liu YF; Zhu WD; Zhu FD; Wang WB; Jiang XF; Dong XT Comput Biol Med; 2021 Feb; 129():104153. PubMed ID: 33260102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides. Skjerven H; Riis UH; Herlofsson BB; Ellingsen JE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of a custom two-piece surgical guide for all-on-four dental implant placement: An in vitro study. Elnashoukaty HM; ElDakkak S; Abdelhakim A J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):101.e1-101.e9. PubMed ID: 37230911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]