261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37199394)
1. Diagnostic value of high-risk HPV other than type 16/18 in high-grade cervical neoplasia among cytology-negative women: A multicenter retrospective study.
Bai A; Xue P; Li Q; Jiang Y; Qiao Y
Cancer Med; 2023 Jul; 12(13):14794-14805. PubMed ID: 37199394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of CIN2+ /CIN3+ risk of different HPV subtypes infection combined with abnormal cytology status].
Luo HX; Du H; Liu ZH; Zhang LJ; Wang C; Wu RF
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 40(3):232-238. PubMed ID: 29575846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The clinical utility of extended high-risk HPV genotyping in risk-stratifying women with L-SIL cytology: A retrospective study of 8726 cases.
Tao X; Zhang H; Zhang H; Xiao Y; Zhong F; Zhou X; Cong Q; Sui L; Zhao C
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Jul; 130(7):542-550. PubMed ID: 35312217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stratified risk of high-grade cervical disease using onclarity HPV extended genotyping in women, ≥25 years of age, with NILM cytology.
Stoler MH; Wright TC; Parvu V; Yanson K; Cooper CK; Andrews J
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 30638767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping and cytology triage, COMPACT Study: Design, methods and baseline results in 14 642 women.
Aoyama-Kikawa S; Fujita H; Hanley SJB; Kasamo M; Kikuchi K; Torigoe T; Matsuno Y; Tamakoshi A; Sasaki T; Matsuura M; Kato Y; Dong P; Watari H; Saito T; Sengoku K; Sakuragi N
Cancer Sci; 2018 Jun; 109(6):2003-2012. PubMed ID: 29660849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Performance of combined liquid based cytology and HPV nucleic acid test for detecting cervical precancer among women attending screening].
Jiang MY; Feng RM; Wang L; Li TY; Zhang AA; Cui JF; Pan QJ; Zhang X; Liu ML; Gao F; Chen W; Qiao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 40(10):750-756. PubMed ID: 30392339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Risk stratification of type-specific human papillomavirus for cervical precancers: evidence from a cross-sectional study in Shenzhen].
Liu ZH; Lin W; Wang YY; Wu B; Yuan SX; Yao JL; Zhao XS; Chen B; Qiao YL; Zhao FH; Chen W; Hu SY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 40(10):757-763. PubMed ID: 30392340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Triaging HPV-positive, cytology-negative cervical cancer screening results with extended HPV genotyping and p16
Song F; Yan P; Huang X; Wang C; Qu X; Du H; Wu R
BMC Infect Dis; 2021 Apr; 21(1):400. PubMed ID: 33931022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA methylation testing with S5 for triage of high-risk HPV positive women.
Adcock R; Nedjai B; Lorincz AT; Scibior-Bentkowska D; Banwait R; Torrez-Martinez N; Robertson M; Cuzick J; Wheeler CM;
Int J Cancer; 2022 Oct; 151(7):993-1004. PubMed ID: 35477862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical relevance of partial HPV16/18 genotyping in stratifying HPV-positive women attending routine cervical cancer screening: a population-based cohort study.
Gori S; Battagello J; Gustinucci D; Campari C; Zorzi M; Frayle H; Passamonti B; Sartori G; Bulletti S; Fodero C; Cesarini E; Faggiano R; Del Mistro A
BJOG; 2021 Jul; 128(8):1353-1362. PubMed ID: 33326680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Genotyping and Cytological Testing as Triage Testing Within Human Papillomavirus-Based Screening in Mexico.
Torres-Ibarra L; Cuzick J; Lorincz AT; Spiegelman D; Lazcano-Ponce E; Franco EL; Moscicki AB; Mahmud SM; Wheeler CM; Rivera-Paredez B; Hernández-López R; León-Maldonado L; Salmerón J;
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1915781. PubMed ID: 31747033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extended HPV Genotyping for Risk Assessment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2/3 or Worse in a Cohort Study.
Li X; Rao X; Wei MJ; Lu WG; Xie X; Wang XY
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2022 Aug; 20(8):906-914.e10. PubMed ID: 35948040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection Rate of High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotyping with Reflex Liquid-based Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening.
Tay SK; Lin LE; Goh RC
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2017 Jul; 46(7):267-273. PubMed ID: 28821890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. p16/Ki67 dual stain triage versus cytology in primary human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening with limited genotyping.
Trzeszcz M; Mazurec M; Jach R; Mazurec K; Kotkowska-Szeps I; Kania M; Wantuchowicz M; Wasowska J; Duczek-Polakiewicz M; Rozmus P; Streb J; Halon A
J Med Virol; 2023 Nov; 95(11):e29271. PubMed ID: 38009626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples.
Song F; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Wu R;
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234518. PubMed ID: 32525936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Castle PE; Schiffman M; Wheeler CM; Wentzensen N; Gravitt PE
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 Jul; 19(7):1675-81. PubMed ID: 20615885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. HPV Testing With 16, 18, and 45 Genotyping Stratifies Cancer Risk for Women With Normal Cytology.
Stoler MH; Wright TC; Parvu V; Yanson K; Eckert K; Kodsi S; Cooper C
Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 Mar; 151(4):433-442. PubMed ID: 30649177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of Different Follow-Up Strategies and Genotype-Based Recurrence Risk After Treatment of Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion.
Graça J; Preti M; Pollano B; Vieira-Baptista P
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2024 Apr; 28(2):131-136. PubMed ID: 38465957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
