175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37199407)
1. Comparison of Preferences and Data Quality between Discrete Choice Experiments Conducted in Online and Face-to-Face Respondents.
Jiang R; Pullenayegum E; Shaw JW; Mühlbacher A; Lee TA; Walton S; Kohlmann T; Norman R; Pickard AS
Med Decis Making; 2023 Aug; 43(6):667-679. PubMed ID: 37199407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off.
Jiang R; Shaw J; Mühlbacher A; Lee TA; Walton S; Kohlmann T; Norman R; Pickard AS
Qual Life Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1433-1444. PubMed ID: 33247810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report.
Mulhern B; Bansback N; Brazier J; Buckingham K; Cairns J; Devlin N; Dolan P; Hole AR; Kavetsos G; Longworth L; Rowen D; Tsuchiya A
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Feb; 18(12):vii-xxvi, 1-191. PubMed ID: 24568945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Test-Retest Reliability of EQ-5D-5L Valuation Techniques: The Composite Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.
Purba FD; Hunfeld JAM; Timman R; Iskandarsyah A; Fitriana TS; Sadarjoen SS; Passchier J; Busschbach JJV
Value Health; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1243-1249. PubMed ID: 30314626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Valuing Health Using Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods: Does Dimension Order Impact on Health State Values?
Mulhern B; Shah K; Janssen MF; Longworth L; Ibbotson R
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 27021755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do health preferences differ among Asian populations? A comparison of EQ-5D-5L discrete choice experiments data from 11 Asian studies.
Yang Z; Purba FD; Shafie AA; Igarashi A; Wong EL; Lam H; Van Minh H; Lin HW; Ahn J; Pattanaphesaj J; Jo MW; Mai VQ; Busschbach J; Luo N; Jiang J
Qual Life Res; 2022 Jul; 31(7):2175-2187. PubMed ID: 35181827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Ikeda S; Noto S; Igarashi A; Fukuda T; Saito S; Shimozuma K
Value Health; 2016; 19(5):648-54. PubMed ID: 27565282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Valuing EQ-5D-5L health states 'in context' using a discrete choice experiment.
Cole A; Shah K; Mulhern B; Feng Y; Devlin N
Eur J Health Econ; 2018 May; 19(4):595-605. PubMed ID: 28569351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficient Designs for Valuation Studies That Use Time Tradeoff (TTO) Tasks to Map Latent Utilities from Discrete Choice Experiments to the Interval Scale: Selection of Health States for TTO Tasks.
Che M; Pullenayegum E
Med Decis Making; 2023 Apr; 43(3):387-396. PubMed ID: 36866604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A pilot discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states.
Norman R; Cronin P; Viney R
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Jun; 11(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 23649892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does Changing the Age of a Child to be Considered in 3-Level Version of EQ-5D-Y Discrete Choice Experiment-Based Valuation Studies Affect Health Preferences?
Ramos-Goñi JM; Estévez-Carrillo A; Rivero-Arias O; Rowen D; Mott D; Shah K; Oppe M
Value Health; 2022 Jul; 25(7):1196-1204. PubMed ID: 35379562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D.
M Versteegh M; M Vermeulen K; M A A Evers S; de Wit GA; Prenger R; A Stolk E
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 27325326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM
Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are Web-Based Valuation Surveys for Preference-Based Measures as Reliable as Face-to-Face Surveys? TTO, DCE and DCE with Duration.
Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2024 May; 22(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 38217791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How Should Discrete Choice Experiments with Duration Choice Sets Be Presented for the Valuation of Health States?
Mulhern B; Norman R; Shah K; Bansback N; Longworth L; Viney R
Med Decis Making; 2018 Apr; 38(3):306-318. PubMed ID: 29084472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peruvian Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L: A Direct Comparison of Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.
Augustovski F; Belizán M; Gibbons L; Reyes N; Stolk E; Craig BM; Tejada RA
Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):880-888. PubMed ID: 32762989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigating the relative value of health and social care related quality of life using a discrete choice experiment.
Mulhern B; Norman R; De Abreu Lourenco R; Malley J; Street D; Viney R
Soc Sci Med; 2019 Jul; 233():28-37. PubMed ID: 31153085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Methodological Study to Compare Alternative Modes of Administration With Value EQ-5D Using Preference-Elicitation Techniques.
Hill SR; Gibson A; Oluboyede Y; Longworth L; Bennett B; Shaw JW
Value Health; 2024 Jun; 27(6):784-793. PubMed ID: 38467189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol.
Pickard AS; Law EH; Jiang R; Pullenayegum E; Shaw JW; Xie F; Oppe M; Boye KS; Chapman RH; Gong CL; Balch A; Busschbach JJV
Value Health; 2019 Aug; 22(8):931-941. PubMed ID: 31426935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Eliciting preferences to the EQ-5D-5L health states: discrete choice experiment or multiprofile case of best-worst scaling?
Xie F; Pullenayegum E; Gaebel K; Oppe M; Krabbe PF
Eur J Health Econ; 2014 Apr; 15(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 23553075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
