170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37199816)
1. Groundwater potential assessment using GIS-based ensemble learning models in Guanzhong Basin, China.
Wang Z; Wang J; Yu D; Chen K
Environ Monit Assess; 2023 May; 195(6):690. PubMed ID: 37199816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. GIS-based groundwater potential mapping using boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and random forest machine learning models in Iran.
Naghibi SA; Pourghasemi HR; Dixon B
Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Jan; 188(1):44. PubMed ID: 26687087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk assessment of nitrate groundwater contamination using GIS-based machine learning methods: A case study in the northern Anhui plain, China.
Chen K; Liu Q; Yang T; Ju Q; Zhu M
J Contam Hydrol; 2024 Feb; 261():104300. PubMed ID: 38242063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Groundwater potential mapping using C5.0, random forest, and multivariate adaptive regression spline models in GIS.
Golkarian A; Naghibi SA; Kalantar B; Pradhan B
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Feb; 190(3):149. PubMed ID: 29455381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The potential evaluation of groundwater by integrating rank sum ratio (RSR) and machine learning algorithms in the Qaidam Basin.
Wang Z; Wang J; Yu D; Chen K
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(23):63991-64005. PubMed ID: 37059956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for groundwater quality modeling.
Sahour S; Khanbeyki M; Gholami V; Sahour H; Kahvazade I; Karimi H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):46004-46021. PubMed ID: 36715809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial modeling of land subsidence using machine learning models and statistical methods.
Sekkeravani MA; Bazrafshan O; Pourghasemi HR; Holisaz A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(19):28866-28883. PubMed ID: 34993808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial predictions of groundwater potential using automated machine learning (AutoML): a comparative study of feature selection and training sample size in Qinghai Province, China.
Wang Z; Wang J; Li M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jan; 31(1):1127-1145. PubMed ID: 38038910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. GIS-based groundwater potential mapping in Shahroud plain, Iran. A comparison among statistical (bivariate and multivariate), data mining and MCDM approaches.
Arabameri A; Rezaei K; Cerda A; Lombardo L; Rodrigo-Comino J
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 658():160-177. PubMed ID: 30577015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel ensemble model of automatic multilayer perceptron, random forest, and ZeroR for groundwater potential mapping.
Sachdeva S; Kumar B
Environ Monit Assess; 2021 Oct; 193(11):722. PubMed ID: 34648078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Groundwater spring potential mapping using population-based evolutionary algorithms and data mining methods.
Chen W; Tsangaratos P; Ilia I; Duan Z; Chen X
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Sep; 684():31-49. PubMed ID: 31150874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrated assessment of groundwater potential zones and artificial recharge sites using GIS and Fuzzy-AHP: a case study in Peddavagu watershed, India.
Shekar PR; Mathew A
Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Jun; 195(7):906. PubMed ID: 37382701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using machine learning algorithms to map the groundwater recharge potential zones.
Pourghasemi HR; Sadhasivam N; Yousefi S; Tavangar S; Ghaffari Nazarlou H; Santosh M
J Environ Manage; 2020 Jul; 265():110525. PubMed ID: 32275245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integration of hydrogeological data, GIS and AHP techniques applied to delineate groundwater potential zones in sandstone, limestone and shales rocks of the Damoh district, (MP) central India.
Moharir KN; Pande CB; Gautam VK; Singh SK; Rane NL
Environ Res; 2023 Jul; 228():115832. PubMed ID: 37054834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surface Water-Groundwater Interaction in the Guanzhong Section of the Weihe River Basin, China.
Kong F; Song J; Zhang Y; Fu G; Cheng D; Zhang G; Xue Y
Ground Water; 2019 Jul; 57(4):647-660. PubMed ID: 30582150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dust detection and susceptibility mapping by aiding satellite imagery time series and integration of ensemble machine learning with evolutionary algorithms.
Razavi-Termeh SV; Sadeghi-Niaraki A; Naqvi RA; Choi SM
Environ Pollut; 2023 Oct; 335():122241. PubMed ID: 37482338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of machine learning techniques to predict groundwater quality in the Nabogo Basin, Northern Ghana.
Apogba JN; Anornu GK; Koon AB; Dekongmen BW; Sunkari ED; Fynn OF; Kpiebaya P
Heliyon; 2024 Apr; 10(7):e28527. PubMed ID: 38596013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of groundwater flowing well zone at An-Najif Province, central Iraq using evidential belief functions model and GIS.
Al-Abadi AM; Pradhan B; Shahid S
Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Oct; 188(10):549. PubMed ID: 27600115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of analytical hierarchical process, multi-influencing factor, and geospatial techniques for groundwater potential zonation in a semi-arid region of western India.
Yadav B; Malav LC; Jangir A; Kharia SK; Singh SV; Yeasin M; Nogiya M; Meena RL; Meena RS; Tailor BL; Mina BL; Alhar MSO; Jeon BH; Cabral-Pinto MMS; Yadav KK
J Contam Hydrol; 2023 Feb; 253():104122. PubMed ID: 36563652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The risk assessment of arsenic contamination in the urbanized coastal aquifer of Rayong groundwater basin, Thailand using the machine learning approach.
Sumdang N; Chotpantarat S; Cho KH; Thanh NN
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2023 Mar; 253():114665. PubMed ID: 36863158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
