These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3720106)

  • 1. Direct comparison between bilaterally implanted cemented and uncemented total hip replacements in six patients.
    Ritter MA; Campbell ED
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Jun; (207):77-82. PubMed ID: 3720106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Total hip replacement with cemented, uncemented, and hybrid prostheses. A comparison of clinical and radiographic results at two to four years.
    Wixson RL; Stulberg SD; Mehlhoff M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1991 Feb; 73(2):257-70. PubMed ID: 1899667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis after renal transplantation.
    Murzic WJ; McCollum DE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Feb; (299):212-9. PubMed ID: 8119021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head.
    Lins RE; Barnes BC; Callaghan JJ; Mair SD; McCollum DE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Dec; (297):168-73. PubMed ID: 8242926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis. Two-year results of a prospective consecutive series.
    Callaghan JJ; Dysart SH; Savory CG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1988 Mar; 70(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 3346261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heterotopic ossification after primary cemented and noncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.
    Lieberman IH; Moran E; Hastings DE; Bogoch ER
    Can J Surg; 1994 Apr; 37(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 8156466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early migration of uncemented porous coated anatomic femoral component related to aseptic loosening.
    Kim YH; Kim VE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Oct; (295):146-55. PubMed ID: 8403640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bateman bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Uncemented versus cemented.
    Lo WH; Chen WM; Huang CK; Chen TH; Chiu FY; Chen CM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 May; (302):75-82. PubMed ID: 8168326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of a hybrid with an uncemented total hip replacement. A retrospective matched-pair study.
    Maloney WJ; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1990 Oct; 72(9):1349-52. PubMed ID: 2229111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A preliminary report of the use of a cementless acetabular component with a cemented femoral component.
    Davey JR; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Aug; (245):150-5. PubMed ID: 2752615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncemented total hip replacement and thigh pain.
    Bülow JU; Scheller G; Arnold P; Synatschke M; Jani L
    Int Orthop; 1996; 20(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 8739695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanics of cemented and cementless prostheses.
    Jasty M; Burke D; Harris WH
    Chir Organi Mov; 1992; 77(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 1297569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening.
    Gustilo RB; Pasternak HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):111-9. PubMed ID: 3416518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Amstutz HC; Thomas BJ; Jinnah R; Kim W; Grogan T; Yale C
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1984 Feb; 66(2):228-41. PubMed ID: 6693450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Prospective analysis of the tri-lock femoral component.
    Smith SE; Garvin KL; Jardon OM; Kaplan PA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Aug; (269):43-50. PubMed ID: 1864055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Loosening of the cemented hip prosthesis. The importance of heat injury.
    Mjöberg B
    Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1986; 221():1-40. PubMed ID: 3468743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective analysis of uncemented and hybrid primary porous coated anatomic total hip arthroplasties in a community setting.
    Moskal JT; Shaffrey CI; Ripley LP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jul; (304):139-47. PubMed ID: 8020206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of modern cement technique on acetabular fixation total hip arthroplasty. A retrospective study in matched pairs.
    Ranawat CS; Rawlins BA; Harju VT
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1988 Jul; 19(3):599-603. PubMed ID: 3288936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two- to four-year experience with cemented, press-fit, and porous coated applications of the profile total hip system.
    Henry JD; Reilly D; Poss R
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59 Suppl 1():190-4. PubMed ID: 8116397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.