114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37201226)
1. Single geometry abutment for narrow and extra-narrow implant systems: Survival and failure modes.
Gutierres E; Bergamo ETP; Carvalho LF; Coelho PG; Campos TMB; Piza MMT; Lopes ACO; Benalcazar Jalkh EB; Bonfante EA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jul; 143():105872. PubMed ID: 37201226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant-abutment fit influences the mechanical performance of single-crown prostheses.
Ramalho IS; Bergamo ETP; Witek L; Coelho PG; Lopes ACO; Bonfante EA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Feb; 102():103506. PubMed ID: 31877515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Failure Modes and Survival of Anterior Crowns Supported by Narrow Implant Systems.
Bergamo ETP; de Araújo-Júnior ENS; Lopes ACO; Coelho PG; Zahoui A; Benalcázar Jalkh EB; Bonfante EA
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():1057846. PubMed ID: 32964016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture strength and probability of survival of narrow and extra-narrow dental implants after fatigue testing: In vitro and in silico analysis.
Bordin D; Bergamo ETP; Fardin VP; Coelho PG; Bonfante EA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jul; 71():244-249. PubMed ID: 28365541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of platform diameter in the reliability and failure mode of extra-short dental implants.
Bordin D; Bergamo ETP; Bonfante EA; Fardin VP; Coelho PG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Jan; 77():470-474. PubMed ID: 29032313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fatigue Failure of Narrow Implants with Different Implant-Abutment Connection Designs.
Bordin D; Witek L; Fardin VP; Bonfante EA; Coelho PG
J Prosthodont; 2018 Aug; 27(7):659-664. PubMed ID: 27859976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical testing of implant-supported anterior crowns with different implant/abutment connections.
Almeida EO; Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Marotta L; Silva NR; Coelho PG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 23377054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.
Sailer I; Asgeirsson AG; Thoma DS; Fehmer V; Aspelund T; Özcan M; Pjetursson BE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 29527740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival Probability of Narrow and Standard-Diameter Implants with Different Implant-Abutment Connection Designs.
Freitas GP; Hirata R; Bonfante EA; Tovar N; Coelho PG
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 26929961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and failure modes of narrow implant systems.
Hirata R; Bonfante EA; Anchieta RB; Machado LS; Freitas G; Fardin VP; Tovar N; Coelho PG
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1505-13. PubMed ID: 26526325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Titanium vs Titanium-Zirconium Implant-Abutment Connections.
Leo SJ; Tan MY; Yee SHX; Lee FKF; Tan KBC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):740-747. PubMed ID: 35904830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical stability of angulated zirconia abutments supporting maxillary anterior single crowns on narrow-diameter implants.
Ma R; Yu P; Zhang Y; Xie C; Tan X; Sun J; Yu H
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):221-233. PubMed ID: 36161530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical Stability of Restorations Supported by Titanium Base, Zirconia, and Polyetherketoneketone Abutments on One- and Two-Piece Zirconia Implants.
Cantarella J; Pitta J; Mojon P; Hicklin SP; Fehmer V; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):313-321. PubMed ID: 33909721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and failure modes of anterior single-unit implant-supported restorations.
Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Martins LM; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1005-11. PubMed ID: 22092676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of microthread presence and restoration design (screw versus cemented) in dental implant reliability and failure modes.
Almeida EO; Freitas Júnior AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Coelho PG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Feb; 24(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 22413873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
