229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37203094)
1. Intraocular lens formula calculation in pediatric eyes: Do we have an answer? A retrospective comparison between Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff II and Barret's formula.
Badakere A; Ghaisas SP; Akshya P; Natarajan V; Guha S; Agarkar S
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 71(5):2139-2142. PubMed ID: 37203094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictability of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in infantile eyes with unilateral congenital cataract: results from the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study.
Vanderveen DK; Trivedi RH; Nizam A; Lynn MJ; Lambert SR;
Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 156(6):1252-1260.e2. PubMed ID: 24011524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of newer Kane formula with Sanders Retzlaff Kraff/Theoretical and Barrett Universal II for calculation of intraocular lens power in Indian eyes.
Paritekar P; Nayak A; Umesh Y; Sirivella I; Manoharan S; Khatib Z
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Apr; 70(4):1203-1207. PubMed ID: 35326016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Barrett Universal II formula to previous generation formulae for paediatric cataract surgery.
Elbaz U; Khalili S; Sella R; Reitblat O; Vega Y; Achiron A; Tuuminen R; Ali A; Mireskandari K
Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 100(6):682-689. PubMed ID: 34766439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Alternative method of intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length].
Belov DF; Nikolaenko VP
Vestn Oftalmol; 2022; 138(3):24-28. PubMed ID: 35801876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of fellow eye data in the calculation of intraocular lens power for the second eye.
Olsen T
Ophthalmology; 2011 Sep; 118(9):1710-5. PubMed ID: 21723613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictability of formulae for intraocular lens power calculation according to the age of implantation in paediatric cataract.
Lee BJ; Lee SM; Kim JH; Yu YS
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 103(1):106-111. PubMed ID: 29605815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction error and accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in pediatric patient comparing SRK II and Pediatric IOL Calculator.
Jasman AA; Shaharuddin B; Noor RA; Ismail S; Ghani ZA; Embong Z
BMC Ophthalmol; 2010 Aug; 10():20. PubMed ID: 20738840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for a Trifocal IOL in Eyes With High Myopia.
Tan Q; Lin D; Wang L; Chen B; Tang Q; Chen X; Chen M; Tan J; Zhang J; Wu L; Zhu X; Wang Y
J Refract Surg; 2021 Aug; 37(8):538-544. PubMed ID: 34388073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of IOL power calculation with the Kane formula for pediatric cataract surgery.
Reitblat O; Khalili S; Ali A; Mireskandari K; Vega Y; Tuuminen R; Elbaz U; Sella R
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 260(9):2877-2885. PubMed ID: 35895106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in children less than two years.
Kekunnaya R; Gupta A; Sachdeva V; Rao HL; Vaddavalli PK; Om Prakash V
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jul; 154(1):13-19.e2. PubMed ID: 22336039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the influence of keratometry on intraocular lens calculation formulas in long axial length eyes.
Yin S; Guo C; Qiu K; Ng TK; Li Y; Du Y; Chen B; Wang H; Zhang M
Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct; 42(10):3211-3219. PubMed ID: 36057757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Algorithmic intraocular lens power calculation formula selection by keratometry, anterior chamber depth and axial length.
Kim JW; Eom Y; Yoon EG; Choi Y; Song JS; Jeong JW; Park SK; Kim HM
Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 100(3):e701-e709. PubMed ID: 34378871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraocular lens power calculation formula accuracy: Comparison of 12 formulas for a trifocal hydrophilic intraocular lens.
Rocha-de-Lossada C; Colmenero-Reina E; Flikier D; Castro-Alonso FJ; Rodriguez-Raton A; García-Madrona JL; Peraza-Nieves J; Sánchez-González JM
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 31(6):2981-2988. PubMed ID: 33339479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nationwide multicentre comparison of preoperative biometry and predictability of cataract surgery in Japan.
Kamiya K; Hayashi K; Tanabe M; Tabuchi H; Sato M; Gotoh N; Kojima T; Hatsusaka N;
Br J Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 106(9):1227-1234. PubMed ID: 34108223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of anterior chamber depth on the choice of intraocular lens calculation formula in patients with normal axial length.
Miraftab M; Hashemi H; Fotouhi A; Khabazkhoob M; Rezvan F; Asgari S
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2014; 21(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 25371635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of the SRK/T formula using A-Scan ultrasound biometry after phacoemulsification in eyes with short and long axial lengths.
Karabela Y; Eliacik M; Kaya F
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 16():96. PubMed ID: 27391470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of six methods for the intraocular lens power calculation in high myopic eyes.
Ji J; Liu Y; Zhang J; Wu X; Shao W; Ma B; Luo M
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 31(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 31744328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gender differences in biometry prediction error and intra-ocular lens power calculation formula.
Behndig A; Montan P; Lundström M; Zetterström C; Kugelberg M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):759-63. PubMed ID: 24930806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of the accuracy of modern intraocular lens calculation formulas when optical biometry is not possible].
Belov DF; Danilenko EV; Nikolaenko VP; Potemkin VV
Vestn Oftalmol; 2024; 140(2):34-39. PubMed ID: 38742496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
