These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37203103)

  • 1. Evaluation of the clinical impact and
    Maher YA; Rajeh MT; Hamooda FA; Zerain GO; Habis RM; Sulaimani RH; Albar ST; H Ali FM; Abdelaleem NA
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2023 Apr; 26(4):404-411. PubMed ID: 37203103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam in class two restorations by Streptococcus mutans count analysis at fixed intervals: an in vivo study.
    Tegginmani VS; Goel B; Uppin V; Horatti P; Kumar LS; Nainani A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 24171977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antibacterial activity of restorative dental biomaterials in vitro.
    Boeckh C; Schumacher E; Podbielski A; Haller B
    Caries Res; 2002; 36(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 12037366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of the addition of chlorhexidine and miswak extract on the clinical performance and antibacterial properties of conventional glass ionomer: an in vivo study.
    Kabil NS; Badran AS; Wassel MO
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Sep; 27(5):380-387. PubMed ID: 27766712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of glass ionomer cement added with propolis, chitosan, and chlorhexidine against
    Neelima B; Reddy JS; Singh PT; Suhasini K; Hemachandrika I; Hasanuddin S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2020; 38(4):367-373. PubMed ID: 33402619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.
    Dorri M; Martinez-Zapata MJ; Walsh T; Marinho VC; Sheiham Deceased A; Zaror C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD008072. PubMed ID: 29284075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antibacterial activity of four glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment.
    da Silva RC; Zuanon AC; Spolidorio DM; Campos JA
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 Sep; 18(9):1859-62. PubMed ID: 17497079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical and microbiological performance of resin-modified glass-ionomer liners after incomplete dentine caries removal.
    Duque C; Negrini Tde C; Sacono NT; Spolidorio DM; de Souza Costa CA; Hebling J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Dec; 13(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 19548010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fluoride and mutans streptococci levels in plaque on aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, compomer and resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Kalfas S; Litra V; Oliveby A
    Caries Res; 1997; 31(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 9286522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of the addition of propolis to resin-modified glass ionomer cement bracket adhesive materials on the growth inhibition zone of
    Saputra SK; Sutantyo D; Farmasyanti CA; Alhasyimi AA
    F1000Res; 2019; 8():2105. PubMed ID: 32765830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo cariostatic effect of resin modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam on dentine.
    Kreulen CM; de Soet JJ; Weerheijm KL; van Amerongen WE
    Caries Res; 1997; 31(5):384-9. PubMed ID: 9286523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antibacterial effect and physical properties of chitosan and chlorhexidine-cetrimide-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Mishra A; Pandey RK; Manickam N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 28139479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Streptococcus mutans-induced secondary caries adjacent to glass ionomer cement, composite resin and amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Gama-Teixeira A; Simionato MR; Elian SN; Sobral MA; Luz MA
    Braz Oral Res; 2007; 21(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 18060266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of antibacterial and adhesion properties of chitosan-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Ibrahim MA; Neo J; Esguerra RJ; Fawzy AS
    J Biomater Appl; 2015 Oct; 30(4):409-19. PubMed ID: 26079388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Streptococcus Mutans Biofilm Influences on the Antimicrobial Properties of Glass Ionomer Cements.
    Fúcio SB; Paula AB; Sardi JC; Duque C; Correr-Sobrinho L; Puppin-Rontani RM
    Braz Dent J; 2016; 27(6):681-687. PubMed ID: 27982179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In situ anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement.
    Benelli EM; Serra MC; Rodrigues AL; Cury JA
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 8402802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lack of Buffering by Composites Promotes Shift to More Cariogenic Bacteria.
    Nedeljkovic I; De Munck J; Slomka V; Van Meerbeek B; Teughels W; Van Landuyt KL
    J Dent Res; 2016 Jul; 95(8):875-81. PubMed ID: 27146702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Effect of Dental Luting Cements on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus: An In vitro Study.
    Feroz S; Bhoyar A; Khan S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):973-977. PubMed ID: 27965482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antibacterial and physical properties of EGCG-containing glass ionomer cements.
    Hu J; Du X; Huang C; Fu D; Ouyang X; Wang Y
    J Dent; 2013 Oct; 41(10):927-34. PubMed ID: 23911600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bacterial counts in carious dentine under restorations: 2-year in vivo effects.
    Weerheijm KL; Kreulen CM; de Soet JJ; Groen HJ; van Amerongen WE
    Caries Res; 1999; 33(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 9892780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.