166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37203247)
1. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of subepidermal moisture measurement as part of a process of assessment and intervention to prevent hospital-acquired pressure ulcers.
Posnett JW; Moss JWE; Michaelwaite LI
Int Wound J; 2023 Sep; 20(7):2688-2699. PubMed ID: 37203247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sub-epidermal moisture versus traditional and visual skin assessments to assess pressure ulcer risk in surgery patients.
Martins de Oliveira AL; O'Connor T; Patton D; Strapp H; Moore Z
J Wound Care; 2022 Mar; 31(3):254-264. PubMed ID: 35199594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the impact on hospital acquired pressure injury/ulcer incidence in a United Kingdom NHS Acute Trust from use of sub-epidermal scanning technology.
Nightingale P; Musa L
J Clin Nurs; 2021 Sep; 30(17-18):2708-2717. PubMed ID: 34245066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are labour-intensive efforts to prevent pressure ulcers cost-effective?
Mathiesen AS; Nørgaard K; Andersen MF; Møller KM; Ehlers LH
J Med Econ; 2013 Oct; 16(10):1238-45. PubMed ID: 23926909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring subepidermal moisture to detect early pressure ulcer development: a systematic review.
Moore Z; McEvoy NL; Avsar P; Byrne S; Vitoriano Budri AM; Nugent L; O'Connor T; Curley G; Patton D
J Wound Care; 2022 Aug; 31(8):634-647. PubMed ID: 36001704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subepidermal moisture detection of pressure induced tissue damage on the trunk: The pressure ulcer detection study outcomes.
Bates-Jensen BM; McCreath HE; Patlan A
Wound Repair Regen; 2017 May; 25(3):502-511. PubMed ID: 28494507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early prevention of pressure ulcers among elderly patients admitted through emergency departments: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pham B; Teague L; Mahoney J; Goodman L; Paulden M; Poss J; Li J; Ieraci L; Carcone S; Krahn M
Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Nov; 58(5):468-78.e3. PubMed ID: 21820208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Beds, overlays and mattresses for preventing and treating pressure ulcers: an overview of Cochrane Reviews and network meta-analysis.
Shi C; Dumville JC; Cullum N; Rhodes S; McInnes E; Goh EL; Norman G
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Aug; 8(8):CD013761. PubMed ID: 34398473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subepidermal moisture (SEM) and bioimpedance: a literature review of a novel method for early detection of pressure-induced tissue damage (pressure ulcers).
Moore Z; Patton D; Rhodes SL; O'Connor T
Int Wound J; 2017 Apr; 14(2):331-337. PubMed ID: 27126794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of a sensor-based technology to assist in the prevention of pressure ulcers: A clinical comparison.
Raizman R; MacNeil M; Rappl L
Int Wound J; 2018 Dec; 15(6):1033-1044. PubMed ID: 30160024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Observational, Prospective Cohort Pilot Study to Compare the Use of Subepidermal Moisture Measurements Versus Ultrasound and Visual Skin Assessments for Early Detection of Pressure Injury.
Gefen A; Gershon S
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2018 Sep; 64(9):12-27. PubMed ID: 30256748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between nurses assessment of early pressure ulcer damage and sub epidermal moisture measurement: A prospective explorative study.
O'Brien G; Moore Z; Patton D; O'Connor T
J Tissue Viability; 2018 Nov; 27(4):232-237. PubMed ID: 30017215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of hospital resources for effective pressure injury prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Padula WV; Pronovost PJ; Makic MBF; Wald HL; Moran D; Mishra MK; Meltzer DO
BMJ Qual Saf; 2019 Feb; 28(2):132-141. PubMed ID: 30097490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early versus deferred endovenous ablation of superficial venous reflux in patients with venous ulceration: the EVRA RCT.
Gohel MS; Heatley F; Liu X; Bradbury A; Bulbulia R; Cullum N; Epstein DM; Nyamekye I; Poskitt KR; Renton S; Warwick J; Davies AH
Health Technol Assess; 2019 May; 23(24):1-96. PubMed ID: 31140402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The subepidermal moisture scanner: the technology explained.
Gefen A; Ross G
J Wound Care; 2020 Feb; 29(Sup2c):S10-S16. PubMed ID: 32058838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness and value of information analysis of nutritional support for preventing pressure ulcers in high-risk patients: implement now, research later.
Tuffaha HW; Roberts S; Chaboyer W; Gordon LG; Scuffham PA
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2015 Apr; 13(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 25650349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.
Shi C; Dumville JC; Cullum N; Rhodes S; Jammali-Blasi A; McInnes E
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 May; 5(5):CD013620. PubMed ID: 33969911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shedding new light for nurses: Enhancing pressure injury prevention across skin tones with sub-epidermal moisture assessment technology.
Osborne Chambers C; Thompson JA
J Adv Nurs; 2024 Jul; 80(7):2801-2812. PubMed ID: 38243619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sub-epidermal moisture assessment as a prompt for clinical action in treatment of pressure ulcers in at-risk hospital patients.
Ousey K; Stephenson J; Blackburn J
J Wound Care; 2022 Apr; 31(4):294-303. PubMed ID: 35404699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical impact of a sub-epidermal moisture scanner: what is the real-world use?
Musa L; Ore N; Raine G; Smith G
J Wound Care; 2021 Mar; 30(3):198-208. PubMed ID: 33729842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
