These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37203275)

  • 1. Differences between children and adults in the neural encoding of voice fundamental frequency in the presence of noise and reverberation.
    Easwar V; Peng ZE; Mak V; Mikiel-Hunter J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Jul; 58(2):2547-2562. PubMed ID: 37203275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural Envelope Processing at Low Frequencies Predicts Speech Understanding of Children With Hearing Loss in Noise and Reverberation.
    Easwar V; Peng ZE; Boothalingam S; Seeto M
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):837-849. PubMed ID: 38768048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating potential interactions between envelope following responses elicited simultaneously by different vowel formants.
    Easwar V; Scollie S; Purcell D
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():35-45. PubMed ID: 31176869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
    Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity of Vowel-Evoked Envelope Following Responses to Spectra and Level of Preceding Phoneme Context.
    Easwar V; Boothalingam S; Wilson E
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1327-1335. PubMed ID: 35120354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity of envelope following responses to vowel polarity.
    Easwar V; Beamish L; Aiken S; Choi JM; Scollie S; Purcell D
    Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 320():38-50. PubMed ID: 25500177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phase-locked responses to the vowel envelope vary in scalp-recorded amplitude due to across-frequency response interactions.
    Easwar V; Banyard A; Aiken SJ; Purcell DW
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 48(10):3126-3145. PubMed ID: 30240514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Grinstead L; Yurjevich D
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 33369591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fundamental frequency-dependent changes in vowel-evoked envelope following responses.
    Easwar V; Boothalingam S; Flaherty R
    Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 408():108297. PubMed ID: 34229221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Stimulus Level and Bandwidth on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):619-34. PubMed ID: 26226607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test-Retest Variability in the Characteristics of Envelope Following Responses Evoked by Speech Stimuli.
    Easwar V; Scollie S; Aiken S; Purcell D
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):150-164. PubMed ID: 31136317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Accuracy of Envelope Following Responses in Predicting Speech Audibility.
    Easwar V; Birstler J; Harrison A; Scollie S; Purcell D
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1732-1746. PubMed ID: 33136646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variability in the Estimated Amplitude of Vowel-Evoked Envelope Following Responses Caused by Assumed Neurophysiologic Processing Delays.
    Easwar V; Aiken S; Beh K; McGrath E; Galloy M; Scollie S; Purcell D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Dec; 23(6):759-769. PubMed ID: 36002663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Children and Adults.
    Easwar V; Purcell D; Lasarev M; McGrath E; Galloy M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Oct; 65(10):4009-4023. PubMed ID: 36129844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of phoneme contexts on adaptation in vowel-evoked envelope following responses.
    Easwar V; Chung L
    Eur J Neurosci; 2022 Sep; 56(5):4572-4582. PubMed ID: 35804282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory Brainstem Representation of the Voice Pitch Contours in the Resolved and Unresolved Components of Mandarin Tones.
    Peng F; McKay CM; Mao D; Hou W; Innes-Brown H
    Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():820. PubMed ID: 30505262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Influence of Sensation Level on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses.
    Easwar V; Birstler J; Harrison A; Scollie S; Purcell D
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):250-254. PubMed ID: 34260437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contribution of Resolved and Unresolved Harmonic Regions to Brainstem Speech-Evoked Responses in Quiet and in Background Noise.
    Laroche M; Dajani HR; Marcoux AM
    Audiol Res; 2011 May; 1(1):e7. PubMed ID: 26557316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Envelope following responses elicited by English sentences.
    Choi JM; Purcell DW; Coyne JA; Aiken SJ
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):637-50. PubMed ID: 23575462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cues for perception of the diphthong /aI/ in either noise or reverberation. Part I. Duration of the transition.
    Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Crowley H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2681-93. PubMed ID: 8207141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.