BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37203753)

  • 41. An annotated corpus of clinical trial publications supporting schema-based relational information extraction.
    Sanchez-Graillet O; Witte C; Grimm F; Cimiano P
    J Biomed Semantics; 2022 May; 13(1):14. PubMed ID: 35606797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Using Risk of Bias 2 to assess results from randomised controlled trials: guidance from Cochrane.
    Flemyng E; Moore TH; Boutron I; Higgins JP; Hróbjartsson A; Nejstgaard CH; Dwan K
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Aug; 28(4):260-266. PubMed ID: 36693715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.
    Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S
    J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Agreement in Risk of Bias Assessment Between RobotReviewer and Human Reviewers: An Evaluation Study on Randomised Controlled Trials in Nursing-Related Cochrane Reviews.
    Hirt J; Meichlinger J; Schumacher P; Mueller G
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2021 Mar; 53(2):246-254. PubMed ID: 33555110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Conduct and Reporting of Child Health Research: An Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2012 and Evaluation of Change over 5 Years.
    Gates A; Hartling L; Vandermeer B; Caldwell P; Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Curtis S; Fernandes RM; Klassen TP; Williams K; Dyson MP
    J Pediatr; 2018 Feb; 193():237-244.e37. PubMed ID: 29169611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. High and unclear risk of bias assessments are predominant in diagnostic accuracy studies included in Cochrane reviews.
    Di Girolamo N; Winter A; Meursinge Reynders R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():73-78. PubMed ID: 29777798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessing risk of bias judgments for blinding of outcome assessors in Cochrane reviews.
    Barcot O; Dosenovic S; Boric M; Pericic TP; Cavar M; Jelicic Kadic A; Puljak L
    J Comp Eff Res; 2020 Jun; 9(8):585-593. PubMed ID: 32459105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reliability of 3 assessment tools used to evaluate randomized controlled trials for treatment of neck pain.
    Graham N; Haines T; Goldsmith CH; Gross A; Burnie S; Shahzad U; Talovikova E
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Mar; 37(6):515-22. PubMed ID: 21673624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Overall bias methods and their use in sensitivity analysis of Cochrane reviews were not consistent.
    Babic A; Vuka I; Saric F; Proloscic I; Slapnicar E; Cavar J; Poklepovic Pericic T; Pieper D; Puljak L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 119():57-64. PubMed ID: 31734347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Risk of bias and magnitude of effect in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological review.
    Koletsi D; Spineli LM; Lempesi E; Pandis N
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 38(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 26174770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. How should we evaluate the risk of bias of physical therapy trials?: a psychometric and meta-epidemiological approach towards developing guidelines for the design, conduct, and reporting of RCTs in Physical Therapy (PT) area: a study protocol.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Fuentes J; Rogers T; Hartling L; Saltaji H; Cummings GG
    Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():88. PubMed ID: 24070072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Automating risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews: a real-time mixed methods comparison of human researchers to a machine learning system.
    Jardim PSJ; Rose CJ; Ames HM; Echavez JFM; Van de Velde S; Muller AE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):167. PubMed ID: 35676632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bias in Hand Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review and Meta-Epidemiological Study.
    Heikkinen J; Jokihaara J; Das De S; Jaatinen K; Buchbinder R; Karjalainen T
    J Hand Surg Am; 2022 Jun; 47(6):526-533. PubMed ID: 35341627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Tools to Assess the Risk of Bias and Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Rehabilitation.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Patrini M; Oliveira-Souza AIS; Dennett L; Arienti C; Dahchi M; Negrini S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Aug; 102(8):1606-1613. PubMed ID: 33989599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluating the Risk of Bias of a Study.
    Faggion CM
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2015 Dec; 15(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 26698002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Model validity and risk of bias in randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment.
    Mathie RT; Van Wassenhoven M; Jacobs J; Oberbaum M; Frye J; Manchanda RK; Roniger H; Dantas F; Legg LA; Clausen J; Moss S; Davidson JR; Lloyd SM; Ford I; Fisher P
    Complement Ther Med; 2016 Apr; 25():120-5. PubMed ID: 27062959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Risk of bias assessments for blinding of participants and personnel in Cochrane reviews were frequently inadequate.
    Barcot O; Boric M; Dosenovic S; Poklepovic Pericic T; Cavar M; Puljak L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():104-113. PubMed ID: 31132470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Selecting Risk of Bias Tools for Observational Studies for a Systematic Review of Anthropometric Measurements and Dental Caries among Children.
    Mamikutty R; Aly AS; Marhazlinda J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(16):. PubMed ID: 34444374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quality Assessment of Studies Included in Cochrane Oral Health Systematic Reviews: A Meta-Research.
    Sofi-Mahmudi A; Iranparvar P; Shakiba M; Shamsoddin E; Mohammad-Rahimi H; Naseri S; Motie P; Tovani-Palone MR; Mesgarpour B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(14):. PubMed ID: 34299733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysis.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Fuentes J; Ospina M; Saltaji H; Hartling L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Sep; 13():116. PubMed ID: 24044807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.