BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37204419)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Self-collection Intervention on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake among Underscreened U.S. Persons with a Cervix.
    Spees LP; Biddell CB; Smith JS; Des Marais AC; Hudgens MG; Sanusi B; Jackson S; Brewer NT; Wheeler SB
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2023 Aug; 32(8):1097-1106. PubMed ID: 37204419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Economic Evaluation of Mailed Home-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kits for Cervical Cancer Screening.
    Meenan RT; Troja C; Buist DSM; Tiro JA; Lin J; Anderson ML; Gao H; Green BB; Winer RL
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e234052. PubMed ID: 36947040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of HPV self-collection kits on cervical cancer screening uptake among under-screened women from low-income US backgrounds (MBMT-3): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Pretsch PK; Spees LP; Brewer NT; Hudgens MG; Sanusi B; Rohner E; Miller E; Jackson SL; Barclay L; Carter A; Wheeler SB; Smith JS
    Lancet Public Health; 2023 Jun; 8(6):e411-e421. PubMed ID: 37182529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection on subsequent cervical cancer screening completion among under-screened US women: MyBodyMyTest-3 protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Spees LP; Des Marais AC; Wheeler SB; Hudgens MG; Doughty S; Brewer NT; Smith JS
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):788. PubMed ID: 31881928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Mailed Human Papillomavirus Test Kits vs Usual Care Reminders on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake, Precancer Detection, and Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Winer RL; Lin J; Tiro JA; Miglioretti DL; Beatty T; Gao H; Kimbel K; Thayer C; Buist DSM
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1914729. PubMed ID: 31693128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The cost-effectiveness of opt-in and send-to-all HPV self-sampling among long-term non-attenders to cervical cancer screening in Norway: The Equalscreen randomized controlled trial.
    Knauss T; Hansen BT; Pedersen K; Aasbø G; Kunst N; Burger EA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 168():39-47. PubMed ID: 36371904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of an HPV self-collection campaign in Uganda: comparing models for delivery of cervical cancer screening in a low-income setting.
    Campos NG; Tsu V; Jeronimo J; Njama-Meya D; Mvundura M; Kim JJ
    Health Policy Plan; 2017 Sep; 32(7):956-968. PubMed ID: 28369405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Infrequently Screened Women Completing Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection: My Body My Test-1.
    Lea CS; Perez-Heydrich C; Des Marais AC; Richman AR; Barclay L; Brewer NT; Smith JS
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2019 Aug; 28(8):1094-1104. PubMed ID: 30874477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prophylaxis of cervical cancer and related cervical disease: a review of the cost-effectiveness of vaccination against oncogenic HPV types.
    Armstrong EP
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2010 Apr; 16(3):217-30. PubMed ID: 20331326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus self-collection among cervical cancer screening non-attenders in El Salvador.
    Campos NG; Alfaro K; Maza M; Sy S; Melendez M; Masch R; Soler M; Conzuelo-Rodriguez G; Gage JC; Alonzo TA; Castle PE; Felix JC; Cremer M; Kim JJ
    Prev Med; 2020 Feb; 131():105931. PubMed ID: 31765712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximizing the cost-effectiveness of cervical screening in the context of routine HPV vaccination by optimizing screening strategies with respect to vaccine uptake: a modeling analysis.
    Choi HCW; Leung K; Chan KKL; Bai Y; Jit M; Wu JT
    BMC Med; 2023 Feb; 21(1):48. PubMed ID: 36765349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strategies to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening With Mailed Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling Kits: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Winer RL; Lin J; Anderson ML; Tiro JA; Green BB; Gao H; Meenan RT; Hansen K; Sparks A; Buist DSM
    JAMA; 2023 Nov; 330(20):1971-1981. PubMed ID: 38015219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does mailing unsolicited HPV self-sampling kits to women overdue for cervical cancer screening impact uptake of other preventive health services in a United States integrated delivery system?
    Kariya H; Buist DSM; Anderson ML; Lin J; Gao H; Ko LK; Winer RL
    Prev Med; 2022 Jan; 154():106896. PubMed ID: 34800474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Community-based HPV self-collection versus visual inspection with acetic acid in Uganda: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the ASPIRE trial.
    Mezei AK; Pedersen HN; Sy S; Regan C; Mitchell-Foster SM; Byamugisha J; Sekikubo M; Armstrong H; Rawat A; Singer J; Ogilvie GS; Kim JJ; Campos NG
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jun; 8(6):e020484. PubMed ID: 29895648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative cost-effectiveness of mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening in the Medicaid population.
    Wheeler SB; O'Leary MC; Rhode J; Yang JY; Drechsel R; Plescia M; Reuland DS; Brenner AT
    Cancer; 2020 Sep; 126(18):4197-4208. PubMed ID: 32686116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of the next generation nonavalent human papillomavirus vaccine in the context of primary human papillomavirus screening in Australia: a comparative modelling analysis.
    Simms KT; Laprise JF; Smith MA; Lew JB; Caruana M; Brisson M; Canfell K
    Lancet Public Health; 2016 Dec; 1(2):e66-e75. PubMed ID: 29253419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The road to cervical cancer elimination in Malaysia: Evaluation of the impact and cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus screening with self-collection and digital registry support.
    Keane A; Ng CW; Simms KT; Nguyen D; Woo YL; Saville M; Canfell K
    Int J Cancer; 2021 Dec; 149(12):1997-2009. PubMed ID: 34363620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two self-sampling strategies for HPV primary cervical cancer screening compared with clinician-collected sampling: an economic evaluation.
    Huntington S; Puri Sudhir K; Schneider V; Sargent A; Turner K; Crosbie EJ; Adams EJ
    BMJ Open; 2023 Jun; 13(6):e068940. PubMed ID: 37280031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health economic analysis of human papillomavirus vaccines in women of Chile: perspective of the health care payer using a Markov model.
    Gomez JA; Lepetic A; Demarteau N
    BMC Public Health; 2014 Nov; 14():1222. PubMed ID: 25424716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-Effectiveness of Offering Cervical Cancer Screening with HPV Self-Sampling among African-American Women in the Mississippi Delta.
    Campos NG; Scarinci IC; Tucker L; Peral S; Li Y; Regan MC; Sy S; Castle PE; Kim JJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2021 Jun; 30(6):1114-1121. PubMed ID: 33771846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.