These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Structural organization of the inactive X chromosome in the mouse. Giorgetti L; Lajoie BR; Carter AC; Attia M; Zhan Y; Xu J; Chen CJ; Kaplan N; Chang HY; Heard E; Dekker J Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7613):575-9. PubMed ID: 27437574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contribution of genetic and epigenetic changes to escape from X-chromosome inactivation. Balaton BP; Brown CJ Epigenetics Chromatin; 2021 Jun; 14(1):30. PubMed ID: 34187555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-species examination of X-chromosome inactivation highlights domains of escape from silencing. Balaton BP; Fornes O; Wasserman WW; Brown CJ Epigenetics Chromatin; 2021 Feb; 14(1):12. PubMed ID: 33597016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Escape from X inactivation varies in mouse tissues. Berletch JB; Ma W; Yang F; Shendure J; Noble WS; Disteche CM; Deng X PLoS Genet; 2015 Mar; 11(3):e1005079. PubMed ID: 25785854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Boundaries between chromosomal domains of X inactivation and escape bind CTCF and lack CpG methylation during early development. Filippova GN; Cheng MK; Moore JM; Truong JP; Hu YJ; Nguyen DK; Tsuchiya KD; Disteche CM Dev Cell; 2005 Jan; 8(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 15669143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Control of directionality of chromatin folding for the inter- and intra-domain contacts at the Tfap2c-Bmp7 locus. Tsujimura T; Takase O; Yoshikawa M; Sano E; Hayashi M; Takato T; Toyoda A; Okano H; Hishikawa K Epigenetics Chromatin; 2018 Sep; 11(1):51. PubMed ID: 30213272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of genes escaping X inactivation by allelic expression analysis in a novel hybrid mouse model. Berletch JB; Ma W; Yang F; Shendure J; Noble WS; Disteche CM; Deng X Data Brief; 2015 Dec; 5():761-9. PubMed ID: 26693509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Allele-specific non-CG DNA methylation marks domains of active chromatin in female mouse brain. Keown CL; Berletch JB; Castanon R; Nery JR; Disteche CM; Ecker JR; Mukamel EA Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Apr; 114(14):E2882-E2890. PubMed ID: 28320934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DXZ4 chromatin adopts an opposing conformation to that of the surrounding chromosome and acquires a novel inactive X-specific role involving CTCF and antisense transcripts. Chadwick BP Genome Res; 2008 Aug; 18(8):1259-69. PubMed ID: 18456864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Landscape of DNA methylation on the X chromosome reflects CpG density, functional chromatin state and X-chromosome inactivation. Cotton AM; Price EM; Jones MJ; Balaton BP; Kobor MS; Brown CJ Hum Mol Genet; 2015 Mar; 24(6):1528-39. PubMed ID: 25381334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variable escape from X-chromosome inactivation: identifying factors that tip the scales towards expression. Peeters SB; Cotton AM; Brown CJ Bioessays; 2014 Aug; 36(8):746-56. PubMed ID: 24913292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evolution from XIST-independent to XIST-controlled X-chromosome inactivation: epigenetic modifications in distantly related mammals. Chaumeil J; Waters PD; Koina E; Gilbert C; Robinson TJ; Graves JA PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e19040. PubMed ID: 21541345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deletion of an X-inactivation boundary disrupts adjacent gene silencing. Horvath LM; Li N; Carrel L PLoS Genet; 2013 Nov; 9(11):e1003952. PubMed ID: 24278033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ATRX marks the inactive X chromosome (Xi) in somatic cells and during imprinted X chromosome inactivation in trophoblast stem cells. Baumann C; De La Fuente R Chromosoma; 2009 Apr; 118(2):209-22. PubMed ID: 19005673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct evidence of allele-specific binding of CTCF and MeCP2 to Tsix in a HPRT-deficient female F₁ hybrid mouse cell line. Son J; Min NY; Choi JH; Ko YJ; Liang W; Rhee S; Lee KH Cytogenet Genome Res; 2012; 138(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 22889989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Familial cases of point mutations in the XIST promoter reveal a correlation between CTCF binding and pre-emptive choices of X chromosome inactivation. Pugacheva EM; Tiwari VK; Abdullaev Z; Vostrov AA; Flanagan PT; Quitschke WW; Loukinov DI; Ohlsson R; Lobanenkov VV Hum Mol Genet; 2005 Apr; 14(7):953-65. PubMed ID: 15731119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clustered transcripts that escape X inactivation at mouse XqD. Lopes AM; Arnold-Croop SE; Amorim A; Carrel L Mamm Genome; 2011 Oct; 22(9-10):572-82. PubMed ID: 21769671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. LINE-1 activity in facultative heterochromatin formation during X chromosome inactivation. Chow JC; Ciaudo C; Fazzari MJ; Mise N; Servant N; Glass JL; Attreed M; Avner P; Wutz A; Barillot E; Greally JM; Voinnet O; Heard E Cell; 2010 Jun; 141(6):956-69. PubMed ID: 20550932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. H3K9 trimethylation in active chromatin restricts the usage of functional CTCF sites in SINE B2 repeats. Gualdrini F; Polletti S; Simonatto M; Prosperini E; Pileri F; Natoli G Genes Dev; 2022 Apr; 36(7-8):414-432. PubMed ID: 35361678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]