These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37209214)

  • 1. Parafoveal syntactic processing from word N + 2 during reading: the case of gender-specific German articles.
    Schwalm L; Radach R
    Psychol Res; 2023 Nov; 87(8):2511-2532. PubMed ID: 37209214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm.
    Brothers T; Traxler MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1894-1906. PubMed ID: 27123753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading.
    Snell J; Meeter M; Grainger J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173720. PubMed ID: 28278305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parafoveal-foveal overlap can facilitate ongoing word identification during reading: evidence from eye movements.
    Angele B; Tran R; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):526-38. PubMed ID: 22866764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parafoveal processing in reading.
    Schotter ER; Angele B; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 22042596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-linguistic differences in parafoveal semantic and orthographic processing.
    Fernandez LB; Scheepers C; Allen SEM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Nov; 83(8):3183-3200. PubMed ID: 34312796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Garlic and ginger are not like apples and oranges: Effects of mass/count information on the production of noun phrases in English.
    Fieder N; Nickels L; Krajenbrink T; Biedermann B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):717-748. PubMed ID: 28056624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociating parafoveal preview benefit and parafovea-on-fovea effects during reading: A combined eye tracking and EEG study.
    Niefind F; Dimigen O
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1784-1798. PubMed ID: 27680711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic parafoveal-on-foveal effects and preview benefits in reading: Evidence from Fixation Related Potentials.
    López-Peréz PJ; Dampuré J; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Barber HA
    Brain Lang; 2016 Nov; 162():29-34. PubMed ID: 27513878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: beyond the sub-lexical level?
    Snell J; Vitu F; Grainger J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1984-1996. PubMed ID: 27457807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parafoveal processing of inflectional morphology in Russian: A within-word boundary-change paradigm.
    Stoops A; Christianson K
    Vision Res; 2019 May; 158():1-10. PubMed ID: 30738035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How readers process syntactic input depends on their goals.
    Vandendaele A; Declerck M; Grainger J; Snell J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Feb; 203():103006. PubMed ID: 31955032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic and syntactic composition of minimal adjective-noun phrases in Dutch: An MEG study.
    Kochari AR; Lewis AG; Schoffelen JM; Schriefers H
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 May; 155():107754. PubMed ID: 33476626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prosodic boundaries delay the processing of upcoming lexical information during silent sentence reading.
    Luo Y; Yan M; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):915-30. PubMed ID: 22774853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Capitalization interacts with syntactic complexity.
    Cutter MG; Martin AE; Sturt P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1146-1164. PubMed ID: 31621360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bilingual parafoveal processing: Children and adults preprocess orthographic information of the upcoming word during sentence reading in their first and second language.
    Tiffin-Richards SP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38647459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of high- and low-frequency previews and sentential fit on word skipping during reading.
    Angele B; Laishley AE; Rayner K; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1181-203. PubMed ID: 24707791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Definitely saw it coming? The dual nature of the pre-nominal prediction effect.
    Fleur DS; Flecken M; Rommers J; Nieuwland MS
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104335. PubMed ID: 32619896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contextual constraint and N + 2 preview effects in reading.
    Radach R; Inhoff AW; Glover L; Vorstius C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):619-33. PubMed ID: 23394582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.