149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37209512)
21. Concentration profiles of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in major sources to the environment.
Dasu K; Xia X; Siriwardena D; Klupinski TP; Seay B
J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 301():113879. PubMed ID: 34619593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Predicting Interfacial Tension and Adsorption at Fluid-Fluid Interfaces for Mixtures of PFAS and/or Hydrocarbon Surfactants.
Guo B; Saleem H; Brusseau ML
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 May; 57(21):8044-8052. PubMed ID: 37204869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A fundamental model for calculating interfacial adsorption of complex ionic and nonionic PFAS mixtures in the presence of mixed salts.
Gao Y; Le ST; Kibbey TCG; Glamore W; O'Carroll DM
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2023 Nov; 25(11):1830-1838. PubMed ID: 36987664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The influence of surfactant and solution composition on PFAS adsorption at fluid-fluid interfaces.
Brusseau ML; Van Glubt S
Water Res; 2019 Sep; 161():17-26. PubMed ID: 31174056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comment on "Using foam fractionation to estimate PFAS air-water interface adsorption behaviour at ng/L and µg/L" by T. Buckley, T. Vuong, K. Karanam, P.H.N. Vo, P. Shukla, M. Firouzi & V. Rudolph, Water Research 239, 120028.
Stevenson P
Water Res; 2023 Sep; 243():120374. PubMed ID: 37541129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Response to 'Comment on "Using foam fractionation to estimate PFAS air-water interface adsorption behaviour at ng/L and µg/L" by T. Buckley, T. Vuong, K. Karanam, P.H.N. Vo, P. Shukla, M. Firouzi & V. Rudolph, Water research 239, 120028'.
Buckley T; Vuong T; Karanam K; Vo PHN; Shukla P; Firouzi M; Rudolph V
Water Res; 2024 Feb; 249():120811. PubMed ID: 38103443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of risk management measures on the concentrations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in source and treated drinking waters in Ontario, Canada.
Kleywegt S; Raby M; McGill S; Helm P
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Dec; 748():141195. PubMed ID: 32805563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Batch and fixed bed sorption of low to moderate concentrations of aqueous per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) on Douglas fir biochar and its Fe
Rodrigo PM; Navarathna C; Pham MTH; McClain SJ; Stokes S; Zhang X; Perez F; Gunatilake SR; Karunanayake AG; Anderson R; Thirumalai RVKG; Mohan D; Pittman CU; Mlsna TE
Chemosphere; 2022 Dec; 308(Pt 2):136155. PubMed ID: 36099986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impacts of Environmental and Engineered Processes on the PFAS Fingerprint of Fluorotelomer-Based AFFF.
Balgooyen S; Remucal CK
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Jan; 57(1):244-254. PubMed ID: 36573898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Exploring the factors that influence the adsorption of anionic PFAS on conventional and emerging adsorbents in aquatic matrices.
Wu C; Klemes MJ; Trang B; Dichtel WR; Helbling DE
Water Res; 2020 Sep; 182():115950. PubMed ID: 32604026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Enrichment of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the surface microlayer and foam in synthetic and natural waters.
Schaefer CE; Lemes MCS; Schwichtenberg T; Field JA
J Hazard Mater; 2022 Oct; 440():129782. PubMed ID: 35988483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sampling of freely dissolved per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in surface water and groundwater using a newly developed passive sampler.
Kaltenberg EM; Dasu K; Lefkovitz LF; Thorn J; Schumitz D
Environ Pollut; 2023 Feb; 318():120940. PubMed ID: 36566921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Combination of adsorption/desorption and photocatalytic reduction processes for PFOA removal from water by using an aminated biosorbent and a UV/sulfite system.
Ren Z; Bergmann U; Uwayezu JN; Carabante I; Kumpiene J; Lejon T; Leiviskä T
Environ Res; 2023 Jul; 228():115930. PubMed ID: 37076033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Estimating the number of airports potentially contaminated with perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances from aqueous film forming foam: A Canadian example.
Milley SA; Koch I; Fortin P; Archer J; Reynolds D; Weber KP
J Environ Manage; 2018 Sep; 222():122-131. PubMed ID: 29807261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Remediation of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contaminated soils - To mobilize or to immobilize or to degrade?
Bolan N; Sarkar B; Yan Y; Li Q; Wijesekara H; Kannan K; Tsang DCW; Schauerte M; Bosch J; Noll H; Ok YS; Scheckel K; Kumpiene J; Gobindlal K; Kah M; Sperry J; Kirkham MB; Wang H; Tsang YF; Hou D; Rinklebe J
J Hazard Mater; 2021 Jan; 401():123892. PubMed ID: 33113753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The influence of molecular structure on the adsorption of PFAS to fluid-fluid interfaces: Using QSPR to predict interfacial adsorption coefficients.
Brusseau ML
Water Res; 2019 Apr; 152():148-158. PubMed ID: 30665161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Magnetic ion-exchange (MIEX) resin for perfluorinated alkylsubstance (PFAS) removal in groundwater: Roles of atomic charges for adsorption.
Park M; Daniels KD; Wu S; Ziska AD; Snyder SA
Water Res; 2020 Aug; 181():115897. PubMed ID: 32450335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Retention of PFOS and PFOA Mixtures by Trapped Gas Bubbles in Porous Media.
Abraham JEF; Mumford KG; Patch DJ; Weber KP
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Nov; 56(22):15489-15498. PubMed ID: 36279175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Air-water interfacial areas relevant for transport of per and poly-fluoroalkyl substances.
Brusseau ML; Guo B
Water Res; 2021 Dec; 207():117785. PubMed ID: 34731664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Suspect screening and total oxidizable precursor (TOP) assay as tools for characterization of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS)-contaminated groundwater and treated landfill leachate.
Rehnstam S; Czeschka MB; Ahrens L
Chemosphere; 2023 Sep; 334():138925. PubMed ID: 37187375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
