216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37210612)
1. Otolaryngologists and Reproductive Rights.
Yalamanchi P; Faucett EA; Shuman AG
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Nov; 169(5):1393-1396. PubMed ID: 37210612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of
Herr A
Am J Law Med; 2023 Dec; 49(4):471-492. PubMed ID: 38563269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Societal implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.
Brindis CD; Laitner MH; Clayton EW; Scrimshaw SC; Grosz BJ; Simpson LA; Rosenbaum S; Brierley CL; Simon MA; Roubideaux Y; Calonge BN; Johnson PA; DeStefano L; Bear A; Arora KS; Dzau VJ
Lancet; 2024 Jun; 403(10445):2751-2754. PubMed ID: 38795714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The United States Supreme Court ruling and women's reproductive rights - A position statement issued by The European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG).
Louwen F; Mukhopadhyay S; Mahmood T; Martins NN; Tarlatzis B;
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Dec; 279():130-131. PubMed ID: 36334375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Two Front War on Reproductive Rights-When the Right to Abortion is Banned, Can the Right to Refuse Obstetrical Interventions Be Far behind?
Minkoff H; Vullikanti RU; Marshall MF
Am J Bioeth; 2024 Feb; 24(2):11-20. PubMed ID: 37830758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Critical Analysis of
Manninen BA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):357-367. PubMed ID: 36647699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On Interpretation and Appreciation. A European Human Rights Perspective on
Buijsen M
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):323-336. PubMed ID: 36688281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. (Re)criminalizing Abortion: Returning to the Political with Stories.
Annas GJ
J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 38088615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10.
Ahmed A; Evans DP; Jackson J; Meier BM; Tomori C
J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):485-489. PubMed ID: 38088610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The state of abortion rights in the US.
Davis MF
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):324-329. PubMed ID: 35975678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The criminalisation of women's healthcare in the post-Dobbs era: an analysis of the anti-abortion trigger law statutes.
Domanski K; Allswede M
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2023 Oct; 28(5):258-262. PubMed ID: 37590051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Politics of reproduction: a view from Israel on the Dobbs decision.
Shalev C
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2023 Jan; 12(1):3. PubMed ID: 36694241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Global impacts of
Kaufman R; Brown R; Martínez Coral C; Jacob J; Onyango M; Thomasen K
Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2022 Dec; 30(1):2135574. PubMed ID: 36383177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.
Brindis CD; Laitner MH; Clayton EW; Scrimshaw SC; Grosz BJ; Simpson LA; Rosenbaum S; Brierley CL; Simon MA; Roubideaux Y; Calonge BN; Johnson PA; DeStefano L; Bear A; Arora KS; Dzau VJ
Lancet; 2024 Jun; 403(10445):2747-2750. PubMed ID: 38795713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade.
Cohen IG; Reingold RB; Gostin LO
JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(7):621-622. PubMed ID: 35089318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Bridging the Knowledge Gap: A Toolkit on Reproductive Rights for Pediatric Surgeons in the Post-Dobbs Era.
Mannava SV; Brar A; Patwardhan U; Godfrey J; Berdan E; Gow K; Knod JL
J Pediatr Surg; 2024 Jul; 59(7):1374-1377. PubMed ID: 38589273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.
Rader B; Upadhyay UD; Sehgal NKR; Reis BY; Brownstein JS; Hswen Y
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(20):2041-2047. PubMed ID: 36318194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Ninth Amendment: An Underutilized Protection for Reproductive Choice.
Huff L
J Law Health; 2024; 37(2):105-126. PubMed ID: 38833598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Protecting Health after Dobbs.
Clark BR
Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Nov; 52(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 36537270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
