These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37210863)

  • 1. Attentional shift to the newer object in the successive and simultaneous distractors previewing search.
    Osugi T
    Vision Res; 2023 Aug; 209():108262. PubMed ID: 37210863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional Capture to a Singleton Distractor Degrades Visual Marking in Visual Search.
    Yamauchi K; Osugi T; Murakami I
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():801. PubMed ID: 28559878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking.
    Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A singleton distractor updates the inhibitory template for visual marking.
    Yamauchi K; Kawahara JI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():200-211. PubMed ID: 30530171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal Binding and Segmentation in Visual Search: A Computational Neuroscience Analysis.
    Mavritsaki E; Humphreys G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1553-67. PubMed ID: 27243617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eye movements and time-based selection: where do the eyes go in preview search?
    Watson DG; Inglis M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Oct; 14(5):852-7. PubMed ID: 18087949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual marking for search: behavioral and event-related potential analyses.
    Jacobsen T; Humphreys GW; Schröger E; Roeber U
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):410-21. PubMed ID: 12421664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Onset of background dynamic noise attenuates preview benefit in inefficient visual search.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():33-44. PubMed ID: 25976299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search.
    Fenske MJ; Raymond JE; Kunar MA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):1055-61. PubMed ID: 15875975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No previews are good news: using preview search to probe categorical grouping for orientation.
    Hodsoll JP; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2007 May; 47(11):1464-78. PubMed ID: 17433399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does previewing one stimulus feature help conjunction search?
    Olds ES; Fockler KA
    Perception; 2004; 33(2):195-216. PubMed ID: 15109162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contextual cueing in preview search.
    Toh YN; Sisk CA; Jiang YV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2862-2875. PubMed ID: 32483660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search.
    Humphreys GW; Stalmann BJ; Olivers C
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jul; 66(5):713-30. PubMed ID: 15495898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preview benefit survives a three-dimensional rotation of the rigid configuration of search items.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2019 Mar; 156():56-65. PubMed ID: 30682404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring the spread of spreading suppression: a time-course analysis of spreading suppression and its impact on attentional selection.
    Braithwaite JJ; Hulleman J; Andrews L; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2010 Feb; 50(3):346-56. PubMed ID: 19969012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological correlates of active suppression and attentional selection in preview visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Nov; 120():75-85. PubMed ID: 30359651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The preview benefit in single-feature and conjunction search: Constraints of visual marking.
    Meinhardt G; Persike M
    J Vis; 2015; 15(13):13. PubMed ID: 26382004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional limits in visual search with and without dorsal parietal dysfunction: space-based window or object-based span?
    Vialatte A; Salemme R; Khan AZ; Pisella L
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Oct; 161():108013. PubMed ID: 34474063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual marking across eye blinks.
    Irwin DE; Humphreys GW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Feb; 20(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 23073720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.