These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37211555)

  • 1. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway with modified biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a large cage. Comparative study with minimally invasive microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Heo DH; Jang JW; Park CK
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Aug; 32(8):2853-2862. PubMed ID: 37211555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical results of percutaneous biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with application of enhanced recovery after surgery.
    Heo DH; Park CK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E18. PubMed ID: 30933919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.
    Kang MS; You KH; Choi JY; Heo DH; Chung HJ; Park HJ
    Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 34171465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of mid-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with three-dimensional microscope in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Yu Y; Wang Y; Xie Y; Xu J; Chen Y; Fan X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jan; 37(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 36708116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive tubular transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease].
    Kong F; Zhou Q; Qiao Y; Wang W; Zhang C; Pan Q; Zhu H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 May; 36(5):592-599. PubMed ID: 35570634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion verse 3D microscope-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis with lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study with 24-month follow-up.
    Guo W; Li T; Feng C; Yu Y; Hu Y; Fan X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Dec; 18(1):943. PubMed ID: 38066527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Luan H; Peng C; Liu K; Song X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Nov; 18(1):888. PubMed ID: 37993948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical Efficacy of Bilateral Decompression Using Biportal Endoscopic Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.
    Song X; Ren Z; Cao S; Zhou W; Hao Y
    World Neurosurg; 2023 May; 173():e371-e377. PubMed ID: 36804431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Insertion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Zhao XB; Ma HJ; Geng B; Zhou HG; Xia YY
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Feb; 13(1):328-337. PubMed ID: 33426744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of surgical invasiveness, hidden blood loss, and clinical outcome between unilateral biportal endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective cohort study.
    Huang X; Wang W; Chen G; Guan X; Zhou Y; Tang Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Apr; 24(1):274. PubMed ID: 37038129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study.
    Chen H; Zheng G; Bian Z; Hou C; Li M; Zhang Z; Zhu L; Wang X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 May; 18(1):389. PubMed ID: 37245051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results.
    Chang M; Wang L; Yuan S; Tian Y; Zhao Y; Liu X
    Pain Physician; 2022 Jan; 25(1):E73-E86. PubMed ID: 35051154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Minimal Invasive Versus Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-level Lumbar Disease.
    Kim JE; Yoo HS; Choi DJ; Park EJ; Jee SM
    Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Mar; 34(2):E64-E71. PubMed ID: 33633061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis along with intervertebral disc herniation: a retrospective analysis.
    Fan Z; Wu X; Guo Z; Shen N; Chen B; Xiang H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Feb; 25(1):186. PubMed ID: 38424576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the efficacy and complications of unilateral biportal endoscopic fusion versus minimally invasive fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and mate-analysis.
    Wang Q; Chang S; Dong JF; Fang X; Chen Y; Zhuo C
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Apr; 32(4):1345-1357. PubMed ID: 36867251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Han H; Song Y; Li Y; Zhou H; Fu Y; Li J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Sep; 18(1):656. PubMed ID: 37667363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Guo T; Ding F; Fu B; Yang Z; Yang Y; Liu A; Wang P
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Aug; 188():199-210.e1. PubMed ID: 38810875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Yang Y; Wu X; Wu W; Liu Z; Pang M; Chen Y; Ou Z; Rong L
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():106003. PubMed ID: 32559705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of clinical effect and muscle injury imaging between oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Li SB; Mei SQ; Xu WB; Fang XQ; Fan SW; Huang LB
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2023 May; 36(5):420-7. PubMed ID: 37211932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: Is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study.
    Ao S; Zheng W; Wu J; Tang Y; Zhang C; Zhou Y; Li C
    Int J Surg; 2020 Apr; 76():136-143. PubMed ID: 32165279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.