126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37211615)
1. Coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison between filtered-back projection, hybrid iterative reconstruction, and deep learning reconstruction techniques.
Otgonbaatar C; Jeon PH; Ryu JK; Shim H; Jeon SH; Ko SM; Kim H
Acta Radiol; 2023 Aug; 64(8):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 37211615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality.
Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; Caruso D; Varga-Szemes A; Lesslie VW; Ebersberger U; Canstein C; Thilo C; Hoffmann E; Allmendinger T; Nance JW
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):354-359. PubMed ID: 28756086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of deep learning image reconstructions (DLIR) on coronary artery calcium quantification.
Rossi A; Gennari AG; Etter D; Benz DC; Sartoretti T; Giannopoulos AA; Mikail N; Bengs S; Maurer A; Gebhard C; Buechel RR; Kaufmann PA; Fuchs TA; Messerli M
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jun; 33(6):3832-3838. PubMed ID: 36480026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in reduced radiation dose 320 detector row CT.
Choi AD; Leifer ES; Yu J; Shanbhag SM; Bronson K; Arai AE; Chen MY
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 27591767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improvement in Image Quality and Visibility of Coronary Arteries, Stents, and Valve Structures on CT Angiography by Deep Learning Reconstruction.
Otgonbaatar C; Ryu JK; Shin J; Woo JY; Seo JW; Shim H; Hwang DH
Korean J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1044-1054. PubMed ID: 36196766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic assessment of coronary calcium detectability and quantification on four generations of CT reconstruction techniques: a patient and phantom study.
Dobrolinska MM; van Praagh GD; Oostveen LJ; Poelhekken K; Greuter MJW; Fleischmann D; Willemink MJ; de Lange F; Slart RHJA; Leiner T; van der Werf NR
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Jan; 39(1):221-231. PubMed ID: 36598691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finding the optimal dose reduction and iterative reconstruction level for coronary calcium scoring.
Willemink MJ; den Harder AM; Foppen W; Schilham AM; Rienks R; Laufer EM; Nieman K; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Nathoe HM; Leiner T
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 26342405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Comparison to Filtered Back Projection in Native Cardiac CT.
Obmann VC; Klink T; Heverhagen JT; Stork A; Laqmani A; Adam G; Begemann PG
Rofo; 2015 May; 187(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 25962672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of iterative model reconstruction on coronary artery calcium quantification.
Szilveszter B; Elzomor H; Károlyi M; Kolossváry M; Raaijmakers R; Benke K; Celeng C; Bartykowszki A; Bagyura Z; Lux Á; Merkely B; Maurovich-Horvat P
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 32(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 26285899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose reduction for coronary calcium scoring with hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction: an ex vivo study.
den Harder AM; Willemink MJ; Bleys RL; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Schilham AM; Leiner T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Aug; 30(6):1125-33. PubMed ID: 24794292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D Integrated with Automatic Tube Current Modulation for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification: Comparison to Traditional Filtered Back Projection in an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Patients.
Tang YC; Liu YC; Hsu MY; Tsai HY; Chen CM
Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 29395796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Iterative image reconstruction techniques for CT coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison with traditional filtered back projection in vitro and in vivo.
Schindler A; Vliegenthart R; Schoepf UJ; Blanke P; Ebersberger U; Cho YJ; Allmendinger T; Vogt S; Raupach R; Fink C; Saam T; Bamberg F; Nikolaou K; Apfaltrer P
Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 24471388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Influence of Iterative Reconstruction on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring-Phantom and Clinical Studies.
Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Nakaura T; Funama Y; Yuki H; Kidoh M; Hirata K; Taguchi N; Honda K; Takaoka H; Iyama Y; Katahira K; Noda K; Oshima S; Tokuyasu S; Yamashita Y
Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 27913107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Deep Learning Based Image Reconstruction on Quantitative Results of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring.
Klemenz AC; Beckert L; Manzke M; Lang CI; Weber MA; Meinel FG
Acad Radiol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):2259-2267. PubMed ID: 38582685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction in low-kV 256-slice coronary CT angiography.
Yuki H; Utsunomiya D; Funama Y; Tokuyasu S; Namimoto T; Hirai T; Itatani R; Katahira K; Oshima S; Yamashita Y
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 24661824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultra-low peak voltage CT colonography: effect of iterative reconstruction algorithms on performance of radiologists who use anthropomorphic colonic phantoms.
Shin CI; Kim SH; Lee ES; Lee DH; Hwang EJ; Chung SY; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):759-71. PubMed ID: 25010640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deep learning reconstruction allows for usage of contrast agent of lower concentration for coronary CTA than filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
Otgonbaatar C; Ryu JK; Shin J; Kim HM; Seo JW; Shim H; Hwang DH
Acta Radiol; 2023 Mar; 64(3):1007-1017. PubMed ID: 35979586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study.
McQuiston AD; Muscogiuri G; Schoepf UJ; Meinel FG; Canstein C; Varga-Szemes A; Cannao' PM; Wichmann JL; Allmendinger T; Vliegenthart R; De Cecco CN
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 26724647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correction Factors for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Instead of Filtered Back Projection.
Caruso D; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Felmly LM; Varga-Szemes A; Mangold S; Canstein C; Allmendinger T; Fuller SR; Laghi A; Wichmann JL
Acad Radiol; 2016 Dec; 23(12):1480-1489. PubMed ID: 27614365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
