BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37211978)

  • 1. Reasons for truly negative cytology reports preceding the diagnoses of invasive cervical cancer-Results of a false-negative cytology audit in Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Programme.
    Macios A; Komerska K; Nowakowski A
    Cancer Med; 2023 Jun; 12(12):13800-13810. PubMed ID: 37211978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk factors of cervical cancer after a negative cytological diagnosis in Polish cervical cancer screening programme.
    Macios A; Didkowska J; Wojciechowska U; Komerska K; Glińska P; Kamiński MF; Nowakowski A
    Cancer Med; 2021 May; 10(10):3449-3460. PubMed ID: 33934537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why are Polish women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer after negative cytology in the organized screening programme - a pilot reevaluation of negative Pap smears preceding diagnoses of interval cancers.
    Komerska K; Macios A; Glińska P; Olszewski W; Didkowska J; Wojciechowska U; Kamiński MF; Nowakowski A
    Pol J Pathol; 2021; 72(3):261-266. PubMed ID: 35048639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.
    Koliopoulos G; Nyaga VN; Santesso N; Bryant A; Martin-Hirsch PP; Mustafa RA; Schünemann H; Paraskevaidis E; Arbyn M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 8(8):CD008587. PubMed ID: 28796882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review of cytology and histopathology as part of the NHS Cervical Screening Programme audit of invasive cervical cancers.
    Castanon A; Ferryman S; Patnick J; Sasieni P
    Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 22243289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
    Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An audit of 1632 routinely collected cervical cancer screening smears from 398 women in Germany: Results from the TeQaZ Study.
    Tanaka LF; Schoffer O; Schriefer D; Schauberger G; Ikenberg H; Klug SJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2024 Apr; 201():113915. PubMed ID: 38364626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of prior cervical cytology and HR-HPV testing in women subsequently diagnosed with CIN1, CIN2/3, and invasive cervical cancer: a 4-year routine clinical experience after implementation of systematic training and quality control programs.
    Zhao D; Zhang L; Xie F; Peng D; Wei J; Jiang L; Zhang S; Qi D
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(1):810. PubMed ID: 32847541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.
    Weissbrod D; Torres M; Rodríguez A; Ureña I; Estrada J; Reyes ME; Carreto AJ
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nationwide Rereview of Normal Cervical Cytologies before High-Grade Cervical Lesions or before Invasive Cervical Cancer.
    Edvardsson H; Wang J; Andrae B; Sparén P; Strander B; Dillner J
    Acta Cytol; 2021; 65(5):377-384. PubMed ID: 34077926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Multi-Institutional Feasibility Study on the Use of Automated Screening Systems for Quality Control Rescreening of Cervical Cytology.
    Sugiyama Y; Sasaki H; Komatsu K; Yabushita R; Oda M; Yanoh K; Ueda M; Itamochi H; Okugawa K; Fujita H; Tase T; Nakatani E; Moriya T
    Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(5):451-457. PubMed ID: 27673689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.
    Loopik DL; Koenjer LM; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):200.e1-200.e9. PubMed ID: 32800820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long term results of follow-up after HPV self-sampling with devices Qvintip and HerSwab in women non-attending cervical screening programme.
    Bokan T; Ivanus U; Jerman T; Takac I; Arko D
    Radiol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 55(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 33764704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence of abnormal cervical and vaginal cytology among women over age 65 years living with human immunodeficiency virus.
    Stewart KA; Allen SM; Chesnokova AE; Syed F; Levison JE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):486.e1-486.e10. PubMed ID: 31678094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The artificial intelligence-assisted cytology diagnostic system in large-scale cervical cancer screening: A population-based cohort study of 0.7 million women.
    Bao H; Sun X; Zhang Y; Pang B; Li H; Zhou L; Wu F; Cao D; Wang J; Turic B; Wang L
    Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(18):6896-6906. PubMed ID: 32697872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety of extending screening intervals beyond five years in cervical screening programmes with testing for high risk human papillomavirus: 14 year follow-up of population based randomised cohort in the Netherlands.
    Dijkstra MG; van Zummeren M; Rozendaal L; van Kemenade FJ; Helmerhorst TJ; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; Berkhof J
    BMJ; 2016 Oct; 355():i4924. PubMed ID: 27702796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Efficacy in Abnormal Cervical Cell Detection between Liquid-based Cytology and Conventional Cytology.
    Tanabodee J; Thepsuwan K; Karalak A; Laoaree O; Krachang A; Manmatt K; Anontwatanawong N
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(16):7381-4. PubMed ID: 26514540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morphologic analysis of false negative SurePath® slides using Focalpoint™ GS computer-assisted cervical screening technology: An Australian experience.
    Bowditch RC; Clarke JM; Baird PJ; Greenberg ML
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):870-8. PubMed ID: 26174002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence of positive screening test results and agreement between cytology and human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical cancer screening in North-Western Romania.
    Şuteu O; Blaga ML; Nygård M; Leinonen MK; Nicula F; Păiş R; Coza D; Cadariu PA; Melnic A; Andreassen T; Hashim D; Weiderpass E
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Mar; 29(2):141-148. PubMed ID: 31033568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia.
    Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS
    Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.