147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37212680)
1. Comparison of residual monomer amounts released from indirect bonding adhesives.
Hezenci Y; Akdeniz BS
Angle Orthod; 2023 Sep; 93(5):558-565. PubMed ID: 37212680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Residual monomer leaching from chemically cured and visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives.
Eliades T; Eliades G; Brantley WA; Johnston WM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 7661150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bond strength with custom base indirect bonding techniques.
Klocke A; Shi J; Kahl-Nieke B; Bismayer U
Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 12725374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Initial and fatigue bond strengths of nanofilled and conventional composite bonding adhesives.
BenGassem AA; Georgiou G; Jones SP
J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 40(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 23794694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Micro-CT evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded with different bonding techniques and adhesives.
Öztürk F; Ersöz M; Öztürk SA; Hatunoğlu E; Malkoç S
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 25855655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bisphenol A release from orthodontic adhesives and its correlation with the degree of conversion.
Purushothaman D; Kailasam V; Chitharanjan AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 25533069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces.
Lai PY; Woods MG; Tyas MJ
Aust Orthod J; 1999 Apr; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 11933358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Onto the Tooth Enamel of 120 Freshly Extracted Adult Bovine Medial Lower Incisors Using 4 Adhesives: A Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Adhesive, a Composite Adhesive, a Liquid Composite Adhesive, and a One-Step Light-Cured Adhesive.
Prylińska-Czyżewska A; Maciejewska-Szaniec Z; Olszewska A; Polichnowska M; Grabarek BO; Dudek D; Sobański D; Czajka-Jakubowska A
Med Sci Monit; 2022 Dec; 28():e938867. PubMed ID: 36540003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets to aged composite using a self-adhesive composite: Effect of surface conditioning and different bonding agents.
Valizadeh S; Alimohammadi G; Nik TH; Etemadi A; Tanbakuchi B
Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):528-537. PubMed ID: 32451267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets with a moisture-insensitive primer.
Grandhi RK; Combe EC; Speidel TM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 11244419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Custom base preaging in indirect bonding.
Klocke A; Tadic D; Vaziri F; Kahl-Nieke B
Angle Orthod; 2004 Feb; 74(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 15038498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of brushing on fluoride release from 3 bracket adhesives.
Staley RN; Mack SJ; Wefel JS; Vargas MA; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 15356497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new generation of self-etching adhesives: comparison with traditional acid etch technique.
Holzmeier M; Schaubmayr M; Dasch W; Hirschfelder U
J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Mar; 69(2):78-93. PubMed ID: 18385954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives.
Bishara SE; Laffoon JF; Vonwald L; Warren JJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 May; 121(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 12045771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional, hydrophilic, and self-etching primers.
Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; De Angelis M; Scribante A; Klersy C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jun; 123(6):633-40. PubMed ID: 12806342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of early orthodontic force on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems.
Abdelnaby YL; Al-Wakeel Eel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 20691363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Construction of an
Goyal S; Kulkarni N; Naik A; Naik B
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Feb; 23(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 35748449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
